Frank E Harrell Jr <fharrell at virginia.edu> writes:
> In S-Plus the ... argument for tapply is before simplify.
> In R (1.2.3) ... is after simplify, causing the user to
> have to specify simplify every time ... is used even
> though the default is usually OK. Unless there was a
> benefit to reordering the arguments, it might be a good
> idea to reconsider the current function definition.
> ... is probably used more than simplify
> (e.g., tapply(rainfall, state, quantile, probs=c(.25,.75))).
>
> Thanks -Frank
Right. We have as standard strategy to be calling sequence compatible
with S(-PLUS), unless there's good reason not to, so this is close to
being a bug. Will fix for 1.3.0.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at
stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._