search for: reconsider

Dear R-users, I was wondering if someone could give me some advices on the following problem. I tried to apply moran’s test to a small dataset and couldn’t succeed, here is the error message:   mor <- moran.test(x, res2)   Avis dans moran.test(x, res2) :   Out-of-range p-value: reconsider test arguments   mor     Moran's I test under randomization data:  x  weights: res2   Moran I statistic standard deviate = NaN, p-value = NA alternative hypothesis: greater sample estimates: Moran I statistic       Expectation          Variance       -0.04166667       -0.04166667...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team disapproves strongly of the actions taken by Novell on November 2nd. One of the fundamental differences between the proprietary software world and the free software world is that the proprietary software world divides users by forcing them to agree to coercive licensing agreements which restrict their rights to share with each other,

I just joined the list, and I see in the archives that about a month ago there was a brief discussion of SRP, but it was dismissed. I urge people to take a look at this site: http://srp.stanford.edu/srp/ It's very cool. Let's say I'm on vacation visiting a friend, and I want to log in to my account back home. I trust my friend's machine, but I don't have my home

.... There are long running bugs that need addressing. We would like to be able to direct those who have come up against them toward alternatives which are available now whilst at the same time help those who have come up against the same problems we faced when using Samba in our projects. Please reconsider your position. Thanks

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The Samba Team disapproves strongly of the actions taken by Novell on November 2nd. One of the fundamental differences between the proprietary software world and the free software world is that the proprietary software world divides users by forcing them to agree to coercive licensing agreements which restrict their rights to share with each other,

Hello, How can I save an ActiveRecord without trigger before_save, after_save, etc? Thanks for the help. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group,

...ach we're using in i915, > together with some tricks to kick any stuck waiters so that we can > reliably step in and grab locks for the reset. We tried this approach, but it didn't worked at all. I already considered trying it again because of the upcoming fence implementation, but reconsidering that when a driver is forced to change it's handling because of the fence implementation that's just another hint that there is something wrong here. Christian. > -Daniel

I would like to put Ruby code inside a string, between <%= %> tags, and have the code inside the tags executed when the string is displayed. Is this possible? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...g. We would like to be able >> to direct those who have come up against them toward alternatives >> which are available now whilst at the same time help those who have >> come up against the same problems we faced when using Samba in our >> projects. >> >> Please reconsider your position. > You are welcome individually, but not as a > collective. Individuals can be delt with > well, individually. As a collective you > are unbearable. > > Make separate email addresses for each of > your members. There are free email > services to use. Individual...

...ering a new world. > > Feel comfortable, you are about to learn more about your known (x86 only) world > by discovering a new world, this time the Rpi world. You will see > different bootloaders, cross-compilers, executable formats. > > > Back to the original topic: > > Reconsider the (hard??) dependency on Syslinux by "livecd-creator". Looks like open source to me. Probably a bunch of python scripts. Why not modify it for your use? Even better, figure out its command-line/configs and do it modularly and contribute it? > Or even to use something else as a &qu...

Your suggestion for two passes is indeed my plan if simply using 3-byte sizes is not acceptable. I don't want to duplicate all the logic in a second length-calculating function, so I would just have special logic for the three matching operators with children and use the existing function for the rest, passing a null output stream. Or I could conditionalize all the output on another function

...nes. Moreover, avoiding double CoW is important for SSDs (which have limited lifespan). Even on XFS, sparse RAW files should be faster in the long run than Qcow2 files, due to no weird limitation on L2 chunk cache size. I found the checkbox quite self-explanatory and very handy. Any chances to reconsider your decision? Thanks. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.danti@assyoma.it - info@assyoma.it GPG public key ID: FF5F32A8

...ld you recover if that server were suddenly destroyed, let's say by a power supply failure that fried the motherboard and all the disks? If you can't bring up a machine on new, bare iron starting with nothing but your backups and a CD or USB stick with a recovery tool, you need to seriously reconsider your backup strategy. -- Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it.

...y Disk Image' and use shell_quote() over each param, rather than the current params='-V "My Disk Image"'), but does try to enhance the docs to point it out with more clarity. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- I'm pushing this now, but we may want to reconsider the iso plugin exposing params= that is intentionally designed for another round of shell parsing, as a followup patch. Ideally, we want to avoid ever passing user-supplied data through another shell invocation without first re-quoting it. plugins/iso/nbdkit-iso-plugin.pod | 4 +++- plugins/iso/...

> > For the record, I just workarounded it in pocl by borrowing the > BreakConstantGEPs code from SAFECode. But for SPIR specs, IMHO, this should > be reconsidered. Yes, I agree. On 24 September 2012 15:08, Pekka Jääskeläinen <pekka.jaaskelainen at tut.fi>wrote: > Well, > > To be honest I'm not very comfortable with the whole constant GEP > idea. It's a new thing to me and I do not fully understand its > point in LLVM IR, so...

...LVM release flux of the exception system, along with a lack of universal platform, dwarf JIT support might be a hinderance in such an endeavor. I don't know what the current platform boundaries are for either JIT or JIT with dwarf emission, but I do know that the LLVM exception design is being reconsidered for future releases (possibly 2.7?). Also, as noted in the wiki, please see: http://code.google.com/p/tart/ and http://www.incasoftware.de/~kamm/projects/index.php/2008/08/19/exception-handling-in-llvmdc-using-llvm/ for real world implementations. There are many others, as can be seen in the...

> When gk20a_clk_ctor() returns an error code, pointer "clk" > should be released. Such an information is reasonable. > It's the same when gm20b_clk_new() returns from elsewhere following this call. I suggest to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more. Can it be that the allocated clock object should be kept usable even after a successful return from this function? Would you like to add the tag ?Fixes? to the commit message? Regards, Markus

The original patch was basically fine. Just add a Fixes tag and resend. regards, dan carpenter

On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 01:10:34PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > The original patch was basically fine. > > I propose to reconsider the interpretation of the software situation once more. > > * Should the allocated clock object be kept usable even after > a successful return from this function? Heh. You're right. The patch is freeing "clk" on the success path so that doesn't work. regards, dan...

On 2/6/19 9:35 AM, Ady Ady via Syslinux wrote: >> however, due to the issues with continuing >> to keep the main archive on kernel.org, I have moved the release archive to: > > Will the archive repo in kernel.org ever be updated again? > > Will the archive repo in kernel.org be updated when some > potential/hypothetical/future final/gold version gets released? >