Geoff Lee
2014-Nov-27 01:29 UTC
[Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)
Hi Duncan The difference is that in your call to loadNamespace, the versionCheck list has 3 components (name, op and version), whereas the documentation only mentions 2 (op and version). loadNamespace 'works' for me provided I add a third component to the list (even a nonsense one). What I haven't yet had the fortitude to do is track down through the code to see what the arguments are (ie how many elements there are in the versionCheck list) to any calls to loadNamespace that are generated internally when the Imports to package2 are being loaded (either because they are explicitly mentioned in the NAMESPACE file, or because they are invoked by a "importedpackage1::fun_from_imported_package1" line of code). I'll put a bug report together later today, and include my toy packages etc. Once again thanks for looking at this for me Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 12:09 PM To: Geoff Lee; r-devel at r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked) On 26/11/2014, 7:38 PM, Geoff Lee wrote:> Many thanks Duncan for the quick response.A little too quick, it seems...> > A bug is a relief in a way. I've been digging my way deeper into this > (and learning more as I go) for several days now - but it is a > diversion from (a diversion from) my main goal :-( > > Is there somewhere specific I should report or log the bug or will > that happen from this mailing-list automatically? (I have seen the Bug > Tracking link on the r-project page and followed that, but don't yet > have a Bugzilla account, nor know the precise mechanics and protocols > for notifying a bug)If you can put together a simple set of steps to illustrate a bug, then reporting on bugs.r-project.org is the way to get it recorded. Reporting it on this list is really hit and miss. But I think from your previous description, something else is going on. When I try to load a namespace with a bad version number, I get an error: loadNamespace("rgl", versionCheck=list(name="rgl", op=">", version=package_version('3.0'))) Error in loadNamespace("rgl", versionCheck = list(name = "rgl", op = ">", : namespace 'rgl' 0.95.1163 is being loaded, but > 3.0 is required Duncan Murdoch> > Geoff > > PS Building package2 - via devtools::build('package2', binary = TRUE) > does check and insist that I have an appropriate version of the 'to beimported'> package1 installed in my .libPath(). > > It was only when I simulated a user who has and older version of the > Imported package1 (by overwriting the later version of package 1 with > an earlier version), then trying to load or attach package2 that the > (failure of the version checking) at loadNamespace time for package1 > became apparent (well apparentish after quite a bit of digging) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 10:57 AM > To: Geoff Lee; r-devel at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for > loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked) > > Summary: I think you've found a bug. > > On 26/11/2014, 5:39 PM, Geoff Lee wrote: >> Hi >> >> >> >> I'm still exploring the R programming universe, so if this is being >> asked in the wrong place, or in the wrong way (e.g. too verbose or >> lacking in crucial detail or in the wrong format) please let me know >> >> >> >> I am trying to understand when the version constraints for packages >> which appear in the Imports field of a DESCRIPTION file are checked. > > I would have assumed they are checked when you try to install the package. > If you ask for version 3.0, and only have 0.3, the install should fail. > > But as you've found, the documents say something else... > >> >> >> >> Along the way I've hit a snag understanding what loadNamespace with >> the versionCheck argument set does. The core of my query is 'am I >> doing something wrong, or have I stumbled across a bug?'. Probably >> the former, but after several days I still can't figure it out, so >> any guidance, hints or outright help would be much appreciated. >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> >> >> Geoff >> >> >> >> What I've tried so far. >> >> >> >> "Writing R extensions" section 1.1.3 says >> >> >> >> "The 'Imports' field lists packages whose namespaces are imported >> from (as specified in the NAMESPACE file) but which do not need to beattached.> ... >> shortened for brevity ... Packages declared in the 'Depends' field >> should not also be in the 'Imports' field. Version requirements can >> be specified and are checked when the namespace is loaded (since R >3.0.0). > " >> >> >> >> It is slightly ambiguous, but seems to mean that the version >> dependencies for both Depends packages and Imports packages are >> checked when the package >> (namespace?) is loaded. >> >> >> >> The release notes for R3.0.0 are more direct. They say >> >> >> >> "loadNamespace() allows a version specification to be given, and this >> is used to check version specifications given in the Imports field >> when a namespace is loaded" >> >> >> >> But some toy (locally built and loaded) examples seem to show that >> while the Depends versions are checked, the Imports version >> constraints are not (on Windows 64, running R3.1.2, see full >> session_info > later). >> >> >> >> My tests (package2 imports package1) use implicit loading (via the >> package1::fun1() idiom) so I have worked back to try get a minimal >> example of what's causing me problems. I have tried > > According to what you have written, that should have failed. So it > looks like a bug. >> >> >> >> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list (op = ">=", version >> package_version('3.0'))) >> >> >> >> This should fail (package2 has version 0.3, not 3.0) but instead it >> seems to load package2, version 0.3 OK. >> >> >> >> Reading the code of loadNamespace, there is some code which says >> >> >> >> if (length(z <- versionCheck) == 3L && !do.call(z$op, >> >> list(as.numeric_version(version), z$version))) >> >> stop(gettextf("namespace %s %s is being loaded, but %s %s is >> required", >> >> sQuote(package), version, z$op, z$version), >> >> domain = NA) >> >> >> >> I think it is the length(z <- versionCheck) == 3L part of the if test >> that is allowing the incorrect version be loaded. > > That does seem like a typo. > > Duncan Murdoch > >> >> >> >> The documentation for loadNamespace says that "versionCheck" is >> >> "NULL or a version specification (a list with components op and > version))." >> >> >> >> If I add a third (nonsense) component to the versionCheck argument >> list, then loadNamespace does what I expect. Is there supposed to be >> a third component in the list, and if so what should it be? Or is >> this a > bug? >> >> >> >> I've got this far and am now stumped, hence my query. >> >> >> >> Some output from my tests. >> >> >> >> d> devtools::session_info() >> >> Session >> info----------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> -- >> >> setting value >> >> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >> >> system x86_64, mingw32 >> >> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >> >> language (EN) >> >> collate English_Australia.1252 >> >> tz Australia/Sydney >> >> >> >> Packages------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> ------ >> ---- >> >> package * version date source >> >> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >> >> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >> >> >> >> d> # I think this should fail but it does not >> >> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >> package_version('3.0'))) >> >> <environment: namespace:package2> >> >> >> >> >> >> d> devtools::session_info() >> >> Session >> info----------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> -- >> >> setting value >> >> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >> >> system x86_64, mingw32 >> >> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >> >> language (EN) >> >> collate English_Australia.1252 >> >> tz Australia/Sydney >> >> >> >> Packages------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> ------ >> ---- >> >> package * version date source >> >> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >> >> package2 0.3 2014-11-24 local >> >> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >> >> >> >> d> #Try again with a third (nonsense) entry in the versionCheck list >> >> d> unloadNamespace('package2') >> >> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >> package_version('3.0'), please = 'check it')) >> >> Error in loadNamespace("package2", versionCheck = list(op = ">=", >> version = package_version("3.0"), : >> >> namespace 'package2' 0.3 is being loaded, but >= 3.0 is required >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> d> devtools::session_info() >> >> Session >> info----------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> -- >> >> setting value >> >> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >> >> system x86_64, mingw32 >> >> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >> >> language (EN) >> >> collate English_Australia.1252 >> >> tz Australia/Sydney >> >> >> >> Packages------------------------------------------------------------- >> - >> ------ >> ---- >> >> package * version date source >> >> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >> >> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >> >> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >> package_version('0.3'), please = 'check it')) >> >> <environment: namespace:package2> >> >> d> >> >> >> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >> > >
Duncan Murdoch
2014-Nov-27 10:20 UTC
[Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)
On 26/11/2014, 8:29 PM, Geoff Lee wrote:> Hi Duncan > > The difference is that in your call to loadNamespace, the versionCheck list > has 3 components (name, op and version), whereas the documentation only > mentions 2 (op and version). > loadNamespace 'works' for me provided I add a third component to the list > (even a nonsense one). > > What I haven't yet had the fortitude to do is track down through the code to > see what the arguments are (ie how many elements there are in the > versionCheck list) to any calls to loadNamespace that are generated > internally when the Imports to package2 are being loaded (either because > they are explicitly mentioned in the NAMESPACE file, or because they are > invoked by a "importedpackage1::fun_from_imported_package1" line of code). > > I'll put a bug report together later today, and include my toy packages etc.As mentioned in a different message, the internal code creates a list with members "name", "op", "version". As you've noticed, the "name" part is never used in the loadNamespace code. I'm going to change the code so that the documentation is correct. But you said somewhere or other that you had an example where the implicit load failed to do the check. I don't see why it would. So that's what you should put in your bug report. Duncan Murdoch> > Once again thanks for looking at this for me > > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 12:09 PM > To: Geoff Lee; r-devel at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for > loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked) > > On 26/11/2014, 7:38 PM, Geoff Lee wrote: >> Many thanks Duncan for the quick response. > > A little too quick, it seems... >> >> A bug is a relief in a way. I've been digging my way deeper into this >> (and learning more as I go) for several days now - but it is a >> diversion from (a diversion from) my main goal :-( >> >> Is there somewhere specific I should report or log the bug or will >> that happen from this mailing-list automatically? (I have seen the Bug >> Tracking link on the r-project page and followed that, but don't yet >> have a Bugzilla account, nor know the precise mechanics and protocols >> for notifying a bug) > > If you can put together a simple set of steps to illustrate a bug, then > reporting on bugs.r-project.org is the way to get it recorded. > Reporting it on this list is really hit and miss. But I think from your > previous description, something else is going on. When I try to load a > namespace with a bad version number, I get an error: > > loadNamespace("rgl", versionCheck=list(name="rgl", op=">", > version=package_version('3.0'))) > Error in loadNamespace("rgl", versionCheck = list(name = "rgl", op = ">", : > namespace 'rgl' 0.95.1163 is being loaded, but > 3.0 is required > > Duncan Murdoch > >> >> Geoff >> >> PS Building package2 - via devtools::build('package2', binary = TRUE) >> does check and insist that I have an appropriate version of the 'to be > imported' >> package1 installed in my .libPath(). >> >> It was only when I simulated a user who has and older version of the >> Imported package1 (by overwriting the later version of package 1 with >> an earlier version), then trying to load or attach package2 that the >> (failure of the version checking) at loadNamespace time for package1 >> became apparent (well apparentish after quite a bit of digging) >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 10:57 AM >> To: Geoff Lee; r-devel at r-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for >> loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked) >> >> Summary: I think you've found a bug. >> >> On 26/11/2014, 5:39 PM, Geoff Lee wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm still exploring the R programming universe, so if this is being >>> asked in the wrong place, or in the wrong way (e.g. too verbose or >>> lacking in crucial detail or in the wrong format) please let me know >>> >>> >>> >>> I am trying to understand when the version constraints for packages >>> which appear in the Imports field of a DESCRIPTION file are checked. >> >> I would have assumed they are checked when you try to install the package. >> If you ask for version 3.0, and only have 0.3, the install should fail. >> >> But as you've found, the documents say something else... >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Along the way I've hit a snag understanding what loadNamespace with >>> the versionCheck argument set does. The core of my query is 'am I >>> doing something wrong, or have I stumbled across a bug?'. Probably >>> the former, but after several days I still can't figure it out, so >>> any guidance, hints or outright help would be much appreciated. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> >>> >>> Geoff >>> >>> >>> >>> What I've tried so far. >>> >>> >>> >>> "Writing R extensions" section 1.1.3 says >>> >>> >>> >>> "The 'Imports' field lists packages whose namespaces are imported >>> from (as specified in the NAMESPACE file) but which do not need to be > attached. >> ... >>> shortened for brevity ... Packages declared in the 'Depends' field >>> should not also be in the 'Imports' field. Version requirements can >>> be specified and are checked when the namespace is loaded (since R >> 3.0.0). >> " >>> >>> >>> >>> It is slightly ambiguous, but seems to mean that the version >>> dependencies for both Depends packages and Imports packages are >>> checked when the package >>> (namespace?) is loaded. >>> >>> >>> >>> The release notes for R3.0.0 are more direct. They say >>> >>> >>> >>> "loadNamespace() allows a version specification to be given, and this >>> is used to check version specifications given in the Imports field >>> when a namespace is loaded" >>> >>> >>> >>> But some toy (locally built and loaded) examples seem to show that >>> while the Depends versions are checked, the Imports version >>> constraints are not (on Windows 64, running R3.1.2, see full >>> session_info >> later). >>> >>> >>> >>> My tests (package2 imports package1) use implicit loading (via the >>> package1::fun1() idiom) so I have worked back to try get a minimal >>> example of what's causing me problems. I have tried >> >> According to what you have written, that should have failed. So it >> looks like a bug. >>> >>> >>> >>> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list (op = ">=", version >>> package_version('3.0'))) >>> >>> >>> >>> This should fail (package2 has version 0.3, not 3.0) but instead it >>> seems to load package2, version 0.3 OK. >>> >>> >>> >>> Reading the code of loadNamespace, there is some code which says >>> >>> >>> >>> if (length(z <- versionCheck) == 3L && !do.call(z$op, >>> >>> list(as.numeric_version(version), z$version))) >>> >>> stop(gettextf("namespace %s %s is being loaded, but %s %s is >>> required", >>> >>> sQuote(package), version, z$op, z$version), >>> >>> domain = NA) >>> >>> >>> >>> I think it is the length(z <- versionCheck) == 3L part of the if test >>> that is allowing the incorrect version be loaded. >> >> That does seem like a typo. >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> >>> >>> >>> >>> The documentation for loadNamespace says that "versionCheck" is >>> >>> "NULL or a version specification (a list with components op and >> version))." >>> >>> >>> >>> If I add a third (nonsense) component to the versionCheck argument >>> list, then loadNamespace does what I expect. Is there supposed to be >>> a third component in the list, and if so what should it be? Or is >>> this a >> bug? >>> >>> >>> >>> I've got this far and am now stumped, hence my query. >>> >>> >>> >>> Some output from my tests. >>> >>> >>> >>> d> devtools::session_info() >>> >>> Session >>> info----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> setting value >>> >>> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >>> >>> system x86_64, mingw32 >>> >>> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >>> >>> language (EN) >>> >>> collate English_Australia.1252 >>> >>> tz Australia/Sydney >>> >>> >>> >>> Packages------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> ------ >>> ---- >>> >>> package * version date source >>> >>> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >>> >>> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >>> >>> >>> >>> d> # I think this should fail but it does not >>> >>> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >>> package_version('3.0'))) >>> >>> <environment: namespace:package2> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> d> devtools::session_info() >>> >>> Session >>> info----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> setting value >>> >>> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >>> >>> system x86_64, mingw32 >>> >>> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >>> >>> language (EN) >>> >>> collate English_Australia.1252 >>> >>> tz Australia/Sydney >>> >>> >>> >>> Packages------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> ------ >>> ---- >>> >>> package * version date source >>> >>> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >>> >>> package2 0.3 2014-11-24 local >>> >>> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >>> >>> >>> >>> d> #Try again with a third (nonsense) entry in the versionCheck list >>> >>> d> unloadNamespace('package2') >>> >>> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >>> package_version('3.0'), please = 'check it')) >>> >>> Error in loadNamespace("package2", versionCheck = list(op = ">=", >>> version = package_version("3.0"), : >>> >>> namespace 'package2' 0.3 is being loaded, but >= 3.0 is required >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> d> devtools::session_info() >>> >>> Session >>> info----------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> setting value >>> >>> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >>> >>> system x86_64, mingw32 >>> >>> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >>> >>> language (EN) >>> >>> collate English_Australia.1252 >>> >>> tz Australia/Sydney >>> >>> >>> >>> Packages------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> ------ >>> ---- >>> >>> package * version date source >>> >>> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >>> >>> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >>> >>> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >>> package_version('0.3'), please = 'check it')) >>> >>> <environment: namespace:package2> >>> >>> d> >>> >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>> >> >> > >
Geoff Lee
2014-Nov-27 21:12 UTC
[Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)
Hi Duncan, Many thanks (yet again). With the hint given by your earlier email (viz that currently loadNamespace expects a 3rd component called name in the list that is used for the versionCheck argument) I had another look at what was going on with my toy examples yesterday evening. I'm still working on my issue, but thus far I have: 1) Confirmed that internal calls to loadNamespace triggered by import(somePackage) statements in the NAMESPACE file do create a versionCheck argument that has 3 components in the list. I deduce (but have not worked my way through the specific lines of code insde loadNamespace) that the name is needed while processing the 'import(somepackage)' NAMESPACE directive at some stage (otherwise how do you know what installed 'somepackage' to import and find the version of!) but is *probably* not needed in the versionCheck list argument itself when the loadNamespace call is done (since by then the name 'somepackage' is used as the package argument to the call). I will (very very gratefully) leave to you the resolution of the mismatch between the checkVersion documentation, and the actual implementation - whether you change the documentation (easiest) or the implementation (means tracking down and amending all the internally generated calls) is not something I'm up to even contemplating at the moment. 2) Discovered that the NAMESPACE file in my toy examples did not contain correct import() or importfrom() statements. I'm still figuring out why (it *appears* to be due to the way I have used devtools::create() and then roxygen2 comments and then devtools::document() to generate my toy examples.) Once I figure out what is happening and have 'valid' toy examples I will either a) 'shut up' (because I have found my own error) P>.5; b)follow up the issue of how the NAMESPACE file was by devtools withdevtools itself P ~ .3; or c)come back to this list since I am still struggling P ~< .2 If the protocol is that I should record the complete resolution of my question (for the benefit of future readers) pls let me know and I will do that (once I get there!). Geoff PS Moral for me : Think twice before pulling on a loose piece of string. I've learnt heaps - but I'm still not finished :-( (At this stage the benefits of the learning >> the pain of the journey, so I'll keep going) -----Original Message----- From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 9:21 PM To: Geoff Lee; r-devel at r-project.org Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked) On 26/11/2014, 8:29 PM, Geoff Lee wrote:> Hi Duncan > > The difference is that in your call to loadNamespace, the versionCheck > list has 3 components (name, op and version), whereas the > documentation only mentions 2 (op and version). > loadNamespace 'works' for me provided I add a third component to the > list (even a nonsense one). > > What I haven't yet had the fortitude to do is track down through the > code to see what the arguments are (ie how many elements there are in > the versionCheck list) to any calls to loadNamespace that are > generated internally when the Imports to package2 are being loaded > (either because they are explicitly mentioned in the NAMESPACE file, > or because they are invoked by a"importedpackage1::fun_from_imported_package1" line of code).> > I'll put a bug report together later today, and include my toy packagesetc. As mentioned in a different message, the internal code creates a list with members "name", "op", "version". As you've noticed, the "name" part is never used in the loadNamespace code. I'm going to change the code so that the documentation is correct. But you said somewhere or other that you had an example where the implicit load failed to do the check. I don't see why it would. So that's what you should put in your bug report. Duncan Murdoch> > Once again thanks for looking at this for me > > Geoff > > -----Original Message----- > From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 12:09 PM > To: Geoff Lee; r-devel at r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for > loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked) > > On 26/11/2014, 7:38 PM, Geoff Lee wrote: >> Many thanks Duncan for the quick response. > > A little too quick, it seems... >> >> A bug is a relief in a way. I've been digging my way deeper into this >> (and learning more as I go) for several days now - but it is a >> diversion from (a diversion from) my main goal :-( >> >> Is there somewhere specific I should report or log the bug or will >> that happen from this mailing-list automatically? (I have seen the >> Bug Tracking link on the r-project page and followed that, but don't >> yet have a Bugzilla account, nor know the precise mechanics and >> protocols for notifying a bug) > > If you can put together a simple set of steps to illustrate a bug, > then reporting on bugs.r-project.org is the way to get it recorded. > Reporting it on this list is really hit and miss. But I think from > your previous description, something else is going on. When I try to > load a namespace with a bad version number, I get an error: > > loadNamespace("rgl", versionCheck=list(name="rgl", op=">", > version=package_version('3.0'))) > Error in loadNamespace("rgl", versionCheck = list(name = "rgl", op = ">",:> namespace 'rgl' 0.95.1163 is being loaded, but > 3.0 is required > > Duncan Murdoch > >> >> Geoff >> >> PS Building package2 - via devtools::build('package2', binary = TRUE) >> does check and insist that I have an appropriate version of the 'to >> be > imported' >> package1 installed in my .libPath(). >> >> It was only when I simulated a user who has and older version of the >> Imported package1 (by overwriting the later version of package 1 with >> an earlier version), then trying to load or attach package2 that the >> (failure of the version checking) at loadNamespace time for package1 >> became apparent (well apparentish after quite a bit of digging) >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.duncan at gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, 27 November 2014 10:57 AM >> To: Geoff Lee; r-devel at r-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Rd] Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for >> loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked) >> >> Summary: I think you've found a bug. >> >> On 26/11/2014, 5:39 PM, Geoff Lee wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm still exploring the R programming universe, so if this is being >>> asked in the wrong place, or in the wrong way (e.g. too verbose or >>> lacking in crucial detail or in the wrong format) please let me know >>> >>> >>> >>> I am trying to understand when the version constraints for packages >>> which appear in the Imports field of a DESCRIPTION file are checked. >> >> I would have assumed they are checked when you try to install thepackage.>> If you ask for version 3.0, and only have 0.3, the install should fail. >> >> But as you've found, the documents say something else... >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Along the way I've hit a snag understanding what loadNamespace with >>> the versionCheck argument set does. The core of my query is 'am I >>> doing something wrong, or have I stumbled across a bug?'. Probably >>> the former, but after several days I still can't figure it out, so >>> any guidance, hints or outright help would be much appreciated. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks in advance >>> >>> >>> >>> Geoff >>> >>> >>> >>> What I've tried so far. >>> >>> >>> >>> "Writing R extensions" section 1.1.3 says >>> >>> >>> >>> "The 'Imports' field lists packages whose namespaces are imported >>> from (as specified in the NAMESPACE file) but which do not need to >>> be > attached. >> ... >>> shortened for brevity ... Packages declared in the 'Depends' field >>> should not also be in the 'Imports' field. Version requirements can >>> be specified and are checked when the namespace is loaded (since R >>> >> 3.0.0). >> " >>> >>> >>> >>> It is slightly ambiguous, but seems to mean that the version >>> dependencies for both Depends packages and Imports packages are >>> checked when the package >>> (namespace?) is loaded. >>> >>> >>> >>> The release notes for R3.0.0 are more direct. They say >>> >>> >>> >>> "loadNamespace() allows a version specification to be given, and >>> this is used to check version specifications given in the Imports >>> field when a namespace is loaded" >>> >>> >>> >>> But some toy (locally built and loaded) examples seem to show that >>> while the Depends versions are checked, the Imports version >>> constraints are not (on Windows 64, running R3.1.2, see full >>> session_info >> later). >>> >>> >>> >>> My tests (package2 imports package1) use implicit loading (via the >>> package1::fun1() idiom) so I have worked back to try get a minimal >>> example of what's causing me problems. I have tried >> >> According to what you have written, that should have failed. So it >> looks like a bug. >>> >>> >>> >>> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list (op = ">=", version >>> package_version('3.0'))) >>> >>> >>> >>> This should fail (package2 has version 0.3, not 3.0) but instead it >>> seems to load package2, version 0.3 OK. >>> >>> >>> >>> Reading the code of loadNamespace, there is some code which says >>> >>> >>> >>> if (length(z <- versionCheck) == 3L && !do.call(z$op, >>> >>> list(as.numeric_version(version), z$version))) >>> >>> stop(gettextf("namespace %s %s is being loaded, but %s %s is >>> required", >>> >>> sQuote(package), version, z$op, z$version), >>> >>> domain = NA) >>> >>> >>> >>> I think it is the length(z <- versionCheck) == 3L part of the if >>> test that is allowing the incorrect version be loaded. >> >> That does seem like a typo. >> >> Duncan Murdoch >> >>> >>> >>> >>> The documentation for loadNamespace says that "versionCheck" is >>> >>> "NULL or a version specification (a list with components op and >> version))." >>> >>> >>> >>> If I add a third (nonsense) component to the versionCheck argument >>> list, then loadNamespace does what I expect. Is there supposed to >>> be a third component in the list, and if so what should it be? Or is >>> this a >> bug? >>> >>> >>> >>> I've got this far and am now stumped, hence my query. >>> >>> >>> >>> Some output from my tests. >>> >>> >>> >>> d> devtools::session_info() >>> >>> Session >>> info---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> setting value >>> >>> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >>> >>> system x86_64, mingw32 >>> >>> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >>> >>> language (EN) >>> >>> collate English_Australia.1252 >>> >>> tz Australia/Sydney >>> >>> >>> >>> Packages------------------------------------------------------------ >>> - >>> - >>> ------ >>> ---- >>> >>> package * version date source >>> >>> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >>> >>> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >>> >>> >>> >>> d> # I think this should fail but it does not >>> >>> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >>> package_version('3.0'))) >>> >>> <environment: namespace:package2> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> d> devtools::session_info() >>> >>> Session >>> info---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> setting value >>> >>> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >>> >>> system x86_64, mingw32 >>> >>> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >>> >>> language (EN) >>> >>> collate English_Australia.1252 >>> >>> tz Australia/Sydney >>> >>> >>> >>> Packages------------------------------------------------------------ >>> - >>> - >>> ------ >>> ---- >>> >>> package * version date source >>> >>> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >>> >>> package2 0.3 2014-11-24 local >>> >>> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >>> >>> >>> >>> d> #Try again with a third (nonsense) entry in the versionCheck list >>> >>> d> unloadNamespace('package2') >>> >>> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >>> package_version('3.0'), please = 'check it')) >>> >>> Error in loadNamespace("package2", versionCheck = list(op = ">=", >>> version = package_version("3.0"), : >>> >>> namespace 'package2' 0.3 is being loaded, but >= 3.0 is required >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> d> devtools::session_info() >>> >>> Session >>> info---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - >>> - >>> -- >>> >>> setting value >>> >>> version R version 3.1.2 (2014-10-31) >>> >>> system x86_64, mingw32 >>> >>> ui RStudio (0.98.953) >>> >>> language (EN) >>> >>> collate English_Australia.1252 >>> >>> tz Australia/Sydney >>> >>> >>> >>> Packages------------------------------------------------------------ >>> - >>> - >>> ------ >>> ---- >>> >>> package * version date source >>> >>> devtools 1.6.1 2014-10-07 CRAN (R 3.1.2) >>> >>> rstudioapi 0.1 2014-03-27 CRAN (R 3.1.1) >>> >>> d> loadNamespace('package2', versionCheck = list(op='>=', version >>> package_version('0.3'), please = 'check it')) >>> >>> <environment: namespace:package2> >>> >>> d> >>> >>> >>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]] >>> >>> ______________________________________________ >>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list >>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel >>> >> >> > >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)
- Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)
- Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)
- Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)
- Problem understanding behaviour of versionCheck for loadNamespace (and when versions for Imports packages are checked)