On 21/07/2014 12:17 PM, Gionata Bocci wrote:> Dear List,
>
> I am building a R package which collects ecological data about plant
> species from both remote (web) databases and locally stored rda files
> (datasets): these "local rda files" are derived from publicly
available
> databases for which no "official" licenses are provided; I was
told by the
> creators of these databases that users can use such data provided that the
> correct bibliographic reference is always used (the package is already
> reminding the users about the correct citation(s) to use). I thought a
> CC-by licence would suit this need, thus I am posting here to ask if:
>
> 1) It is possible to distribute these datasets as rda files within my
> package (which will be released as GPL=>2, thus two different licences
will
> be needed for the package)
> 2) If a CC-by licence for these datasets could be included in the
> DESCRIPTION file, using something like "License: CC-by
datasets.rda" for
> each rda file (this is based on this stackoverflow thread
> <http://stackoverflow.com/a/4317300>, but CC-by is not among the
LICENSES
> cited in http://www.r-project.org/Licenses/): I've already tried to do
> this, but, as a consequence, the "R check" raises a warning.
>
> I am aware that this is more a licensing issue then a programming
> problem, but I went through the R FAQ, "Writing R Extensions" and
R-devel
> but was not able to sort this problem out (so, please ignore this post if
> you find it OT).
> I hope the question is not too messy (this is my first time on
R-devel).
> Many thanks for any help you may provide,
If you are not distributing the package to anyone else, you can ignore
the warning about the bad license field.
If you plan to distribute it on a public repository, you should ask the
policies of the repository to find out what to do about this. CRAN
policies are listed at
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html. There's a link
from there to the list of acceptable licenses, and it includes some CC
licenses.
If some parts of the package are licensed one way and others are
licensed in another way, you'll probably need a COPYRIGHTS file to
describe it.
Other repositories (e.g. Bioconductor, Github) presumably have their own
policies on this, but I don't know where to find those.
Duncan Murdoch