On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 ligges at statistik.uni-dortmund.de wrote:
> ggrothendieck at gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Full_Name: G. Grothendieck
>> Version: R version 2.1.0, 2005-05-14
>> OS: Windows XP
>> Submission from: (NULL) (216.59.254.207)
>>
>>
>> This code:
>>
>>
>>> plot(1:10)
>>> text(5,5,lab=expression(italic(22*"33")))
>
> For mathematical non-character-string annotation a math font is used
> that does not support italic/bold/bolditalic/plain.
> It seems to be worth adding this information to ?plotmath, such as:
> "(only for characters, but not for math font)".
I don't think that is true: plotmath uses the same 5 fontfaces as any
other form of graph annotation. The reason was staring Grothendieck
in the face: the code is
static BBOX RenderNumber(SEXP expr, int draw, mathContext *mc,
R_GE_gcontext *gc, GEDevDesc *dd)
{
BBOX bbox;
FontType prevfont = SetFont(PlainFont, gc);
bbox = RenderStr(CHAR(asChar(expr)), draw, mc, gc, dd);
SetFont(prevfont, gc);
return bbox;
}
so it is by design. Numeric constants are always in PlainFont.
>> has the effect of italicizing 33 (which is a character string) but not
22
>> (which is not). I would have thought that both, not just 33, would be
>> italicized.
(We do ask people to actually do the thinking before posting a bug
report.)
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595