Peter Kleiweg <kleiweg@let.rug.nl> writes:
> I have a package with in the documentation:
> in \usage : \dots
> in \arguments: \ldots
>
> This is how I interpreted "Use \dots for the dots in function
> argument lists ..., and \ldots for ellipsis dots in ordinary
> text" in "Writing R Extensions".
>
> When I did `R CMD check' in R version 1.3.1 all was fine.
> With R version 1.4.0 I get :
> * checking for undocumented arguments in \usage ... WARNING
> Undocumented arguments in documentation object `FOO':
> [1] "..."
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
Not really, the checks got stricter. You just need to supply a
line describing what the "..." arguments are for.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To:
r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._