Displaying 20 results from an estimated 35 matches for "ldot".
Did you mean:
ldt
2001 Dec 19
1
dots and ldots in R 1.4.0
I have a package with in the documentation:
in \usage : \dots
in \arguments: \ldots
This is how I interpreted "Use \dots for the dots in function
argument lists ..., and \ldots for ellipsis dots in ordinary
text" in "Writing R Extensions".
When I did `R CMD check' in R version 1.3.1 all was fine.
With R version 1.4.0 I get :
* checking for undocumente...
2015 Aug 16
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
...ting}
#define VIRTIO_NET_S_LINK_UP 1
#define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE 2
\end{lstlisting}
-The following driver-read-only field, \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} only exists if
-VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is set. This field specifies the maximum number
-of each of transmit and receive virtqueues (receiveq1\ldots receiveqN
-and transmitq1\ldots transmitqN respectively) that can be configured once VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ
-is negotiated.
-
\begin{lstlisting}
struct virtio_net_config {
u8 mac[6];
@@ -3140,6 +3131,35 @@ struct virtio_net_config {
};
\end{lstlisting}
+\field{mac}, \field{status}, \field{...
2003 Oct 12
6
Rd problems
Hola!
I have the following in a .Rd file:
\eqn{\mbox{coef} = c(\mbox{coef}[1],\ldots, \mbox{coef}[n]) }
{coef = c(coef[1], coef[2], \dots, coef[n])}
However, both arguments come out in the latex file!
Whats happening?
Kjetil Halvorsen
2015 Aug 17
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
...NK_UP 1
> #define VIRTIO_NET_S_ANNOUNCE 2
> \end{lstlisting}
>
> -The following driver-read-only field, \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} only exists if
> -VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is set. This field specifies the maximum number
> -of each of transmit and receive virtqueues (receiveq1\ldots receiveqN
> -and transmitq1\ldots transmitqN respectively) that can be configured once VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ
> -is negotiated.
> -
> \begin{lstlisting}
> struct virtio_net_config {
> u8 mac[6];
> @@ -3140,6 +3131,35 @@ struct virtio_net_config {
> };
> \end{lstlis...
2015 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
...tatus bits depends on two
> > different feature flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > +
> > +\item [\field{max_virtqueue_pairs}] tells the driver the maximum
> > + number of each of virtqueues (receiveq1\ldots receiveqN and
> > + transmitq1\ldots transmitqN respectively) that can be configured
> > + on the device once VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is negotiated.
> > + \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} is valid only if VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is
> > + set and can be read by the driver.
> >...
2015 Aug 19
1
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
...tatus bits depends on two
> > different feature flags.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com>
> > ---
> > +
> > +\item [\field{max_virtqueue_pairs}] tells the driver the maximum
> > + number of each of virtqueues (receiveq1\ldots receiveqN and
> > + transmitq1\ldots transmitqN respectively) that can be configured
> > + on the device once VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is negotiated.
> > + \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} is valid only if VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is
> > + set and can be read by the driver.
> >...
2011 Jul 26
1
Optimal Code for subset of Integer Sets
Hi,
I wanted to know if there existed an good implementation in R of the
following classical subset Integers :
$P_{n,m} = {k_1, \ldots, k_m \in \mathbb{N} : k_1 + \ldots + k_m = n }$
for any integers $m < n$. There is an obvious not optimal code which would
be to run through $m$ sums and put a boolean condition to report if the
integers respect these condition but it would take $m^n$ steps...
Thanks for your answers,
David...
1997 Aug 27
2
R-alpha: Proposal for a new R doc source format
...ons without need for escaping
Keywords:
---------
Start all keywords with a backslash like in latex, because IMO the
word TITLE should not be something special simply because it is
written in capital letters.
if possible, keep latex syntax whenever possible, e.g., replace
greekalpha with \alpha, LDOTS with \ldots, etc.
Unknown keywords are ignored and result in a warning message from the
parser.
Logical Blocks:
---------------
The current logical blocks of the source files such as
TITLE(...)
USAGE(...)
ALIAS(...)
ARGUMENTS(...)
are kept and the first step of parsing the file is split...
2015 Aug 16
5
[PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-net: default_mtu - new conf. field
This set of two patches adds a new field called default_mtu to
the configuration area of network devices. The motivation is to
allow libvirt to set initial MTU different from 1500 on guests
virtual NICs. We also propose to use this new field to report
MTU changes by the guest OS to the device to facilitate
debugging and mtu tunning.
The first patch just clarify the definition of existing fields
2015 Aug 16
5
[PATCH v2 0/2] virtio-net: default_mtu - new conf. field
This set of two patches adds a new field called default_mtu to
the configuration area of network devices. The motivation is to
allow libvirt to set initial MTU different from 1500 on guests
virtual NICs. We also propose to use this new field to report
MTU changes by the guest OS to the device to facilitate
debugging and mtu tunning.
The first patch just clarify the definition of existing fields
2013 Oct 21
2
Error de markdownToHTML al parsear LATEX
...be como <sup> y <em> respectivamente.
Estos símbolos no puedo simplemente reemplazarlos pues markdown los utiliza para indicar negrita y cursiva, por lo que se interpretan mal!.
¿Qué puedo hacer?
Ejemplo de lo que ocurre:
Fórmula escrita en el .md (Rstudio)
" $x_{1},x^{2},\ldots x_{n}:\overline {x}=\dfrac {\sum _{i}x_{i}} {n}$"
Línea del file generado por la función 'markdownToHTML':
> lineas[218]
[1] "<p>$$x<em>{1},x<sup>{2},\\ldots</sup> x</em>{n}:\\overline {x}=\\dfrac {\\sum <em>{i}x</em>{i}} {n}$$<...
2009 Sep 06
2
question about ... passed to two different functions
I have hit a problem with the design of the mcmc package I can't
figure out, possibly because I don't really understand the R function
call mechanism. The function metrop in the mcmc package has a ... argument
that it passes to one or two user-supplied functions, which are other
arguments to metrop. When the two functions don't have the same arguments,
this doesn't work.
2008 Aug 15
1
Strange error message from geoR´s likfit () lik. max. func.
ComRades:
I am geeting the error message
Error in ldots[[which(MET)]] : attempt to select less than one element
when I try to fit the geostatistical model with the likfit() function of
geoR.
I have tried with old data for which likfit() successfully maximised the
likelihood in previous versions of geoR, and yet the current version
fails.
I have tried i...
2008 Nov 13
1
Experimental Rd parser in trunk.
I've just committed the parse_Rd() function to R-devel. This is a
parser for Rd files, described in
http://developer.r-project.org/parseRd.pdf
It is not identical to the current parser, and about a dozen of the base
man pages currently signal syntax errors. It also detected errors in 10
files that were errors according to both definitions, but were missed by
the current system, and
2015 Aug 20
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] virtio-net: rephrase devconf fields description
...two
>>> different feature flags.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Victor Kaplansky <victork at redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> +
>>> +\item [\field{max_virtqueue_pairs}] tells the driver the maximum
>>> + number of each of virtqueues (receiveq1\ldots receiveqN and
>>> + transmitq1\ldots transmitqN respectively) that can be configured
>>> + on the device once VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is negotiated.
>>> + \field{max_virtqueue_pairs} is valid only if VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ is
>>> + set and can be read by the driver...
2003 Oct 12
1
Rd problems --- followup
I should'nt have sent the last mail so fast.
Same problem with
\eqn{u_j = a_j + b x + c x^2, \quad j=1, \ldots, r-1}
{u[j] = a[j] + b*x + c*x^2 j = 1,\dots,r-1}
I thought the problem in the first case could have to do with
the use use of \mbox{} (with the braces) within the arguments
of \eqn, but here there are none braces in the arguments of \eqn{}{}.
Another case giving the same problem is...
1997 May 08
1
R-alpha: Equations in Plots
...ressions to
represent the mathematical expressions. So far we have (or will soon
have):
R LaTeX
x^i x^i
x[i] x_i
alpha \alpha
Alpha \Alpha
hat(x) \hat{x} \widehat{x}
bar(x) \bar{x} \overline{x}
x+y x+y
x-y x-y
x/y x/y
(x) (x)
{x} {x}
frac(x,y) \frac{x}{y}
cdots \cdots
ldots \ldots
We are wondering how far to go with this process. Does the above
cover what people want, or are there important omitted features
(we don't really want to do all of TeX).
We are prototyping this in lisp and it will be a little while before
it finds its way onto R.
Ross
=-=-=-=-=-=-...
2010 Jan 29
1
qpois Help problems (PR#14200)
...qpois(q, lambda) is the smallest integer x
such that P(X <= x) >= q."
"q" is used as a probability when the Arguments section defines it to be a
quantile.
Also there are some representation problems where the escape character is
printed instead of interpreted, such as "\ldots" and "\lambda" in the preceding
lines.
2010 Sep 16
0
S4 plot generic documentation
...hods.Rd would be ok:
---<--------------------cut here---------------start------------------->---
\name{plot-methods}
\docType{methods}
\alias{plot-methods}
\alias{plot}
\alias{plot,track,missing-method}
\title{Methods}
\description{A plotting method}
\usage{\S4method{plot}{track,missing}(x, \ldots)}
\arguments{
\item{x}{track.}
\item{\ldots}{Arguments passed to \code{\link{plot}}.}
}
\section{Methods}{
\describe{
\item{plot}{\code{signature(x="track", y="missing")}: some plot.}
}
}
\keyword{methods}
---<--------------------cut here---------------end-------...
2013 Oct 21
0
Error de markdownToHTML al parsear LATEX
...vamente.
>
> Estos símbolos no puedo simplemente reemplazarlos pues markdown los
> utiliza para indicar negrita y cursiva, por lo que se interpretan mal!.
> ¿Qué puedo hacer?
>
>
> Ejemplo de lo que ocurre:
> Fórmula escrita en el .md (Rstudio)
> " $x_{1},x^{2},\ldots x_{n}:\overline {x}=\dfrac {\sum _{i}x_{i}}
> {n}$"
>
> Línea del file generado por la función 'markdownToHTML':
> > lineas[218]
> [1] "<p>$$x<em>{1},x<sup>{2},\\**ldots</sup> x</em>{n}:\\overline
> {x}=\\dfrac {\\sum &...