Hi all,
I''d appreciate your help improving our understanding of what the
community is most looking for from Puppet, how Reductive Labs manages
it, and how best to provide services around the project.
Toward this end, we''ve created a short survey (it should take you less
than ten minutes):
http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/95175/q1-2008-puppet-user-survey
Please take a few minutes to complete it. We appreciate your
feedback, and as always, feel free to contact me personally if you
have any questions or concerns.
--
Meeting, n.:
An assembly of people coming together to decide what person or
department not represented in the room must solve a problem.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Robin Lee Powell
2009-Jan-27 09:07 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: A Survey about Puppet and Reductive Labs
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 04:54:53PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote:> > Hi all, > > I''d appreciate your help improving our understanding of what the > community is most looking for from Puppet, how Reductive Labs > manages it, and how best to provide services around the project. > > Toward this end, we''ve created a short survey (it should take you > less than ten minutes): > > http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/95175/q1-2008-puppet-user-surveyThis survey presents a challenge for me. My work has lots of machines and uses cfengine (as an aside, Nate Campi''s my boss''s boss, and while he''s certainly willing to take my word that Puppet is better at this point, there''s a *lot* of stuff we''d have to convert (I count 630K lines of cfengine config), and it''s not really worth the effort). All 3 of my person machines are puppet managed. The way the survey''s written, I''d fill out stuff about my personal machines. But I don''t *want* Puppet optimized for my 3 personal boxes; I want Puppet optimized for my work, even though we''re not (currently) using it there. Not sure what to do with that. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I''m thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
James Turnbull
2009-Jan-27 09:12 UTC
[Puppet Users] Re: A Survey about Puppet and Reductive Labs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Robin Lee Powell wrote:> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 04:54:53PM -0600, Luke Kanies wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I''d appreciate your help improving our understanding of what the >> community is most looking for from Puppet, how Reductive Labs >> manages it, and how best to provide services around the project. >> >> Toward this end, we''ve created a short survey (it should take you >> less than ten minutes): >> >> http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/95175/q1-2008-puppet-user-survey > > This survey presents a challenge for me. My work has lots of > machines and uses cfengine (as an aside, Nate Campi''s my boss''s > boss, and while he''s certainly willing to take my word that Puppet > is better at this point, there''s a *lot* of stuff we''d have to > convert (I count 630K lines of cfengine config), and it''s not really > worth the effort). > > All 3 of my person machines are puppet managed. The way the > survey''s written, I''d fill out stuff about my personal machines. > > But I don''t *want* Puppet optimized for my 3 personal boxes; I want > Puppet optimized for my work, even though we''re not (currently) > using it there. > > Not sure what to do with that.Be aspirational. Identify what it is about cfengine you don''t currently like in your enterprise, add in your personal experiences with Puppet, and survey away. Cheers James - -- Author of: * Pulling Strings with Puppet (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590599780/) * Pro Nagios 2.0 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590596099/) * Hardening Linux (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1590594444/) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJfs/l9hTGvAxC30ARAvNaAKC2mch7qg6H1jTcC1cONt1e/IMZegCgtZGL j1Ug38jjDEfOWiDH+HMvGmc=TPql -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---