search for: 630k

Hi all, I''d appreciate your help improving our understanding of what the community is most looking for from Puppet, how Reductive Labs manages it, and how best to provide services around the project. Toward this end, we''ve created a short survey (it should take you less than ten minutes): http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/95175/q1-2008-puppet-user-survey Please take a few

...log of /var/log/httpd/ : [Sun Aug 16 04:26:19 2009] [info] Server built: Jul 14 2009 06:02:39 --00:21:14-- http://code.go.ro/paypal.com.tar Resolving code.go.ro... 81.196.20.134 Connecting to code.go.ro|81.196.20.134|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 645120 (630K) [application/x-tar] Saving to: `paypal.com.tar' 0K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 7% 70.0K 8s 50K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 15% 265K 5s 100K .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 23% 284K 3s 150K .......... .............

Hi Ted, Thanks a lot for this analysis. > In FLOAT_DIVU() it hangs at the following: > while (a.m >= b.m) > { > e++; > a.m >>= 1; > } > for the case where a and b are both zero (yes, division by zero). > This happens from mdf.c: True, that needs to be fixed even after I fix the rest. > leak_estimate =

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105 markus at openbsd.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From markus at openbsd.org 2002-02-07 06:54 ------- could you please try this without scp? e.g.

...; > > > That's the fft initialization that calls a lot of float cos() functions. > > If you have a fixed version of cos() you can use it there, otherwise a > > fixed table (for a certain size) would work. > > > >> and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions > >> for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point > >> canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are > >> similar > >> to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. > > > > The ord...

...a day or two. > > I need to make a decision soon whether to seriously pursue making this > work. With that in mind, here are some questions: > > 1. speex_echo_state_init takes about 20M instructions, which is a little > frightening, and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K > instructions for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed > point canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are > similar to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. > > 2. The testecho example uses a frame length and tail si...

...t's the fft initialization that calls a lot of float cos() functions. > > > If you have a fixed version of cos() you can use it there, otherwise a > > > fixed table (for a certain size) would work. > > > > > >> and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions > > >> for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point > > >> canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are > > >> similar > > >> to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. > &gt...

...M instructions, which is a little > frightening, That's the fft initialization that calls a lot of float cos() functions. If you have a fixed version of cos() you can use it there, otherwise a fixed table (for a certain size) would work. > and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions > for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point > canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are similar > to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. The order of magnitude seems right. It may be possible to reduce...

...I will not get to that for a day or two. I need to make a decision soon whether to seriously pursue making this work. With that in mind, here are some questions: 1. speex_echo_state_init takes about 20M instructions, which is a little frightening, and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are similar to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. 2. The testecho example uses a frame length and tail size that are powers of t...

...ttle >> frightening, > > That's the fft initialization that calls a lot of float cos() functions. > If you have a fixed version of cos() you can use it there, otherwise a > fixed table (for a certain size) would work. > >> and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions >> for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point >> canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are >> similar >> to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. > > The order of magnitude seems right. I...

...; > > > That's the fft initialization that calls a lot of float cos() functions. > > If you have a fixed version of cos() you can use it there, otherwise a > > fixed table (for a certain size) would work. > > > >> and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions > >> for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point > >> canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are > >> similar > >> to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. > > > > The orde...

...initialization that calls a lot of float cos() > > > functions. > > > If you have a fixed version of cos() you can use it there, otherwise a > > > fixed table (for a certain size) would work. > > > > > >> and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions > > >> for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point > > >> canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are > > >> similar > > >> to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, complexity 1. > &gt...

...a lot of float cos() > > > > functions. > > > > If you have a fixed version of cos() you can use it there, otherwise a > > > > fixed table (for a certain size) would work. > > > > > > > >> and the calls to speex_echo_cancel take about 630K instructions > > > >> for 128 samples. Given your recent experience with the fixed point > > > >> canceller, does this sound rational? The MIPs for the canceller are > > > >> similar > > > >> to the MIPs for the encoder running 8kbps, co...

(i use the term loosely because i know that zfs likes whole volumes better) when installing ubuntu, i got in the habit of using a separate partition for my home directory so that my data and gnome settings would all remain intact when i reinstalled or upgraded. i''m running osol 2008.11 on an ultra 20, which has only two drives. i''ve got all my data located in my home directory,

...t prot opt in out source destination Chain POSTROUTING (policy ACCEPT 2530K packets, 117M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 7200 433K eth1_masq all -- * eth1 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 630K packets, 51M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination Chain eth1_masq (1 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 9 432 MASQUERADE all -- * * 192.168.9.0/24 0.0.0.0/0 Mangle Table...

I apologize for the first message. :) --------------------------------------- I have an FTP server running in the DMZ section of my home network. It uses port 23000 for connection and ports 19990 to 19994 for data transfer. I have setup the following rule for outside people to connect to it: DNAT net dmz:192.168.2.2 tcp 23000 I''m at work right now and I can''t use