Puppet users - Apr 2007 - Puppet rpm packages for RHEL4 x86_64?

Just wondering if anyone has built (or found) Puppet rpm packages for
RHEL4 x86_64 version.

James

*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************

On Apr 18, 2007, at 7:59 PM, HARRIS Jimmy (AXA-Tech-AU) wrote:
> Just wondering if anyone has built (or found) Puppet rpm packages for
> RHEL4 x86_64 version.
>
Puppet is non-binary, the packages should work fine on x86 and x86_64  
(on Debian they are marked as arch "all").

-Blake

> > Just wondering if anyone has built (or found) Puppet rpm packages
for
> > RHEL4 x86_64 version.
> 
> Puppet is non-binary, the packages should work fine on x86 
> and x86_64 (on Debian they are marked as arch "all").
I thought that too so I had previously tried an installation of the
RHEL4 i386 package.

The standard install failed with "Failed dependencies: ruby(api) = 1.8
is needed..." even though ruby and ruby-libs 1.8.1-7 are installed.

A forced rpm installation (--nodeps) resulted in an error of:

"/usr/sbin/puppetd:157:in `require'': No such file to load --
puppet
(LoadError) from /usr/sbin/puppetd:157"

James

*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************

> A forced rpm installation (--nodeps) resulted in an error of:
> 
> "/usr/sbin/puppetd:157:in `require'': No such file to load --
puppet
> (LoadError) from /usr/sbin/puppetd:157"
If it wasn''t clear, this error occurred when trying to run puppet for
the first time, not during the rpm installation.

*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************

On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 01:46:26PM +1000, HARRIS Jimmy (AXA-Tech-AU) wrote:
> > > Just wondering if anyone has built (or found) Puppet rpm packages
> for
> > > RHEL4 x86_64 version.
> > 
> > Puppet is non-binary, the packages should work fine on x86 
> > and x86_64 (on Debian they are marked as arch "all").
> 
> I thought that too so I had previously tried an installation of the
> RHEL4 i386 package.
The RHEL4 ruby under x86_64 has a bug, have a look at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203800
You can not use noarch packages for ruby until the bug is fixed.
> The standard install failed with "Failed dependencies: ruby(api) = 1.8
> is needed..." even though ruby and ruby-libs 1.8.1-7 are installed.
Ruby under RHEL4 doesn''t provide ruby(api) = 1.8.
> A forced rpm installation (--nodeps) resulted in an error of:
> 
> "/usr/sbin/puppetd:157:in `require'': No such file to load --
puppet
> (LoadError) from /usr/sbin/puppetd:157"
The rpms in http://people.redhat.com/dlutter for RHEL4 are arch specific
and don''t require ruby(api) but unfortunately there are no x86_64
versions
available so you''ll have to build one from the source rpms.
For my RHEL4 systems I just build a newer ruby rpm (based on the fedora one)
so I can use noarch ruby packages and have the ruby(api) provide.

Kostas Georgiou

On Apr 19, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 01:46:26PM +1000, HARRIS Jimmy (AXA-Tech- 
> AU) wrote:
>
>>>> Just wondering if anyone has built (or found) Puppet rpm
packages
>> for
>>>> RHEL4 x86_64 version.
>>>
>>> Puppet is non-binary, the packages should work fine on x86
>>> and x86_64 (on Debian they are marked as arch "all").
>>
>> I thought that too so I had previously tried an installation of the
>> RHEL4 i386 package.
>
> The RHEL4 ruby under x86_64 has a bug, have a look at:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203800
> You can not use noarch packages for ruby until the bug is fixed.
>
>> The standard install failed with "Failed dependencies: ruby(api) =
>> 1.8
>> is needed..." even though ruby and ruby-libs 1.8.1-7 are
installed.
>
> Ruby under RHEL4 doesn''t provide ruby(api) = 1.8.
CentOS provides newer ruby packages in their testing repository.

-Blake

> > The RHEL4 ruby under x86_64 has a bug, have a look at:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203800
> > You can not use noarch packages for ruby until the bug is fixed.
> >
> >> The standard install failed with "Failed dependencies:
ruby(api) > >> 1.8
> >> is needed..." even though ruby and ruby-libs 1.8.1-7 are
installed.
> >
> > Ruby under RHEL4 doesn''t provide ruby(api) = 1.8.
> 
> CentOS provides newer ruby packages in their testing repository.
Thanks all, I''ll either trying using the newer ruby packages from
CentOS
or building my own.

James

*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************

> The rpms in http://people.redhat.com/dlutter for RHEL4 are 
> arch specific and don''t require ruby(api) but unfortunately 
> there are no x86_64 versions available so you''ll have to 
> build one from the source rpms.
> For my RHEL4 systems I just build a newer ruby rpm (based on 
> the fedora one) so I can use noarch ruby packages and have 
> the ruby(api) provide.
Is there any chance of making this rpm available?  I''ve tried building
from srpms but keep getting bad exit status errors.

James

*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************

What about a RPM for RHEL/CentOS 5?

--jason


On Apr 19, 2007, at 5:00 PM, HARRIS Jimmy ((AXA-Tech-AU)) wrote:
>>> The RHEL4 ruby under x86_64 has a bug, have a look at:
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203800
>>> You can not use noarch packages for ruby until the bug is fixed.
>>>
>>>> The standard install failed with "Failed dependencies:
ruby(api) >>>> 1.8
>>>> is needed..." even though ruby and ruby-libs 1.8.1-7 are
installed.
>>>
>>> Ruby under RHEL4 doesn''t provide ruby(api) = 1.8.
>>
>> CentOS provides newer ruby packages in their testing repository.
>
> Thanks all, I''ll either trying using the newer ruby packages from
> CentOS
> or building my own.
>
> James
>
> ********************************************************************** 
> ***********
> Important Note
> This email (including any attachments) contains information which is
> confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not
> the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this
> email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the
> sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this
> email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank  
> you.
> ********************************************************************** 
> ************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Puppet-users mailing list
> Puppet-users@madstop.com
> https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 20:59 -0700, Jason Dillon wrote:
> What about a RPM for RHEL/CentOS 5?
Packages are at http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/rhel5/

David

On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 10:32 +0100, Kostas Georgiou
wrote:
> The rpms in http://people.redhat.com/dlutter for RHEL4 are arch specific
To give some more detail: the RHEL4 ruby doesn''t have asingle directory
on $: that stays constant across arches, they are all under /usr/lib for
i386, and /usr/lib64 for x86_64. That''s the reason why the RHEL4 puppet
packages are arch-specific.

You should be able to rebuild the SRPM on RHEL4 with
        rpmbuild --define ''dist el4'' --define ''rhel
4'' http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/puppet-0.22.3-1.src.rpm
        
David

Sweet, thanks :-)

--jason


On Apr 20, 2007, at 10:31 AM, David Lutterkort wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 20:59 -0700, Jason Dillon wrote:
>> What about a RPM for RHEL/CentOS 5?
>
> Packages are at http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/rhel5/
>
> David
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Puppet-users mailing list
> Puppet-users@madstop.com
> https://mail.madstop.com/mailman/listinfo/puppet-users

> To give some more detail: the RHEL4 ruby doesn''t have asingle 
> directory on $: that stays constant across arches, they are 
> all under /usr/lib for i386, and /usr/lib64 for x86_64. 
> That''s the reason why the RHEL4 puppet packages are arch-specific.
> 
> You should be able to rebuild the SRPM on RHEL4 with
>         rpmbuild --define ''dist el4'' --define
''rhel 4''
> http://people.redhat.com/dlutter/yum/SRPMS/puppet-0.22.3-1.src.rpm
I''ve successfully built both ruby and puppet but I am still getting an
error of:

/usr/sbin/puppetd:157:in `require'': no such file to load -- puppet
(LoadError)
	from /usr/sbin/puppetd:157

when I try to run puppet.

If I run (based on Luke''s check for openssl support):

ruby -rpuppet -e "puts :yep"

Any ideas?  It looks to me like /usr/sbin/puppetd is requiring puppet
from a different location but I don''t know where to start looking for
the problem.

Cheers,

James

*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************

Sorry, meant to say:

If I run (based on Luke''s check for openssl support):
 
ruby -rpuppet -e "puts :yep"

I get "yep". 



*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************

On Apr 23, 2007, at 7:22 PM, HARRIS Jimmy ((AXA-Tech-AU))
wrote:
>
> I''ve successfully built both ruby and puppet but I am still
getting an
> error of:
>
> /usr/sbin/puppetd:157:in `require'': no such file to load -- puppet
> (LoadError)
> 	from /usr/sbin/puppetd:157
>
> when I try to run puppet.
>
> If I run (based on Luke''s check for openssl support):
>
> ruby -rpuppet -e "puts :yep"
>
> Any ideas?  It looks to me like /usr/sbin/puppetd is requiring puppet
> from a different location but I don''t know where to start looking
for
> the problem.
$10 says you''ve got two versions of ruby installed, and your shell is  
finding one version but when you run puppetd you''re getting a  
different version.

  --
  The only really good place to buy lumber is at a store where the  
lumber
  has already been cut and attached together in the form of furniture,
  finished, and put inside boxes.         --Dave Barry
  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
  Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com

> > I''ve successfully built both ruby and puppet but I am still
getting
an error of:
> >
> > /usr/sbin/puppetd:157:in `require'': no such file to load --
puppet
(LoadError)
> > 	from /usr/sbin/puppetd:157
> >
> > when I try to run puppet.
> >
> > If I run (based on Luke''s check for openssl support):
> >
> > ruby -rpuppet -e "puts :yep"
> >
> > Any ideas?  It looks to me like /usr/sbin/puppetd is requiring
puppet from a different 
> > location but I don''t know where to start looking for the
problem.
> 
> $10 says you''ve got two versions of ruby installed, and your 
> shell is finding one version but when you run puppetd you''re 
> getting a different version.
Luke,

The $10 is yours next time you''re here in Australia as you were
absolutely correct.

Thanks for everyone''s help on this.  After building ruby and puppet, it
looks like I now have puppet succesfully running on RHEL4 U4 x86_64.  Is
there a central package repository I should consider adding these to?

James

*********************************************************************************
Important Note
This email (including any attachments) contains information which is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not 
the intended recipient you must not use, distribute or copy this 
email.  If you have received this email in error please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this email. Any views expressed in this 
email are not necessarily the views of AXA-Tech Australia.   Thank you.
**********************************************************************************