On Feb 13, 2007, at 11:38 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Peter Abrahamsen <peter@betcha.com> writes:
>
>> Nope. What would this do?
>
> Let you install i386 RPMs on an x86_64 system, which is sometimes
> unfortunately necessary to support some broken application you
can''t
> recompile.
Things like this -- passing extra information to the packaging system
-- seem to be coming up in droves right now. I just want to note
that I''m perfectly willing to extend the functionality of the package
type to support anything (reasonable) that people are looking for, as
long as you can come up with a consistent way of expressing it.
José''s page about this covers some of the complexity that will begin
to accumulate:
https://reductivelabs.com/cgi-bin/puppet.cgi/wiki/
ImprovedResourceIdentification
--
Nature and nature''s laws lay hid in night,
God said, "Let Newton be," and all was light.
It did not last; the devil howling "Ho!
Let Einstein be!" restored the status quo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com