Ben Finney <ben+debian at benfinney.id.au> writes:> On 18-Oct-2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> tags 391935 + lenny-ignore
> No further information has been added on the status of this bug. Can
> we please get a justification in the bug report of why this is being
> tagged ?lenny-ignore??
The release team does not consider this bug something that needs to be
fixed for lenny to be released. While the issue is not completly fixed
yet (as we are missing an actual definition of "compatible with Xen"),
XenSource has clarified that their intentions are something that is
compatible with the DFSG. And, as you yourself pointed out:
| I guess in both those instances, the redistributor could simply rename
| the work to be on the safe side. So long as this option remains
| available I guess the combination is DFSG-free.
-- <20081009023322.GT11042 at benfinney.id.au>
Marc
--
BOFH #122:
because Bill Gates is a Jehovah's witness and so nothing can work on
St. Swithin's day.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20081020/fcfe41fd/attachment.pgp