On Sat, Feb 25, 2006 at 08:07:22PM +0100, Guido Trotter wrote:
Hello,
> One last thought... We haven't heard anything back from Bastian (for
which I'm
> sorry, I would really have liked if he had joined us) and in the meantime
> consensus seem to have formed on -kernel and -devel, or at least there was
no
> more answers... Which means at least people don't disagree strongly
with the
> conclusions taken...
It seems, it seems.
> In the meantime, though, there's still the upload of xen 3 pending in
NEW...
> What about it? Are the ftpmasters going to reject it automatically because
they
> read the ML?
Is there care bears in your world? ;-)
> Are they going to approve it and then we'll have to see what's
> inside and have upgrade paths from that other than Adam's, should we
tell them
> something, either privately, or filing a bug on them! (well, on
ftp.debian.org)
We should try to mail them to ask that they don't accept it.
If it fails, we should simply upload a 3.0.1xenteam-1 version I think or
something like that :-(
--
Julien Danjou
.''`. Debian Developer
: :' : http://julien.danjou.info
`. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid
`- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060226/80f96fd0/attachment-0001.pgp