search for: pend

...e freed transaction handler. At the end of the transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we should not access it after the transaction commitment. - we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot creation if we submitted a async transaction commitment. - pending snapshot access vs pending snapshot free. when something wrong happened after we submitted a async transaction commitment, the transaction committer would cleanup the pending snapshots and free them. But the snapshot creators were not aware of it, they would access the freed pending snap...

I''ve been using RSpec in anger for perhaps a total of a few days and just started playing with Story Runner. Love it. I also started working on a patch, which ought to be simple, to allow for Scenarios without supplied blocks to be treated as pending -- much like "it" in Spec::DSL::ExampleAPI. That said, I noticed something that seemed odd and chatted with Rein Henrichs a little about it on #rspec. ScenarioRunner#run treats "pending" scenarios as an error case. We both believed this to be a little odd as we bo...

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 402249 pending Bug#402249: please include the necessary headers for libvert Tags were: patch sid Tags added: pending > tags 426108 pending Bug#426108: lvm2: Please add LSB formatted dependency info in init.d script Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 460053 pending Bug#460053: ITP: yorick-yao -...

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Saturday 2 February 19:03:31 UTC 2013 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: cliff-tablib > tags 699594 + pending Bug #699594 [wnpp] ITP: cliff-tablib -- tablib formatters for cliff Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: python-tablib...

...rule (closes: #445069). # * ignore.d.server/postfix: # - Postfix considers that "-" can be part of a numeric hostname. # - ignore Postfix bad address syntax errors from postfix/error # (closes: #464896) (Russ Allbery) # package logcheck-database logtail logcheck tags 444097 + pending tags 445069 + pending tags 444096 + pending tags 445074 + pending tags 445046 + pending tags 464896 + pending tags 443881 + pending tags 445073 + pending tags 445072 + pending tags 444100 + pending

...@@ -233,11 +233,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > >> */ > >> for (;;) { > >> /* > >>- * If we observe any contention; queue. > >>+ * If we observe that the queue is not empty or both > >>+ * the pending and lock bits are set, queue > >> */ > >>- if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK) > >>+ if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) || > >>+ (val == (_Q_LOCKED_VAL|_Q_PENDING_VAL))) > >> goto queue; > >>+ if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) { > >>+...

...@@ -233,11 +233,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > >> */ > >> for (;;) { > >> /* > >>- * If we observe any contention; queue. > >>+ * If we observe that the queue is not empty or both > >>+ * the pending and lock bits are set, queue > >> */ > >>- if (val & ~_Q_LOCKED_MASK) > >>+ if ((val & _Q_TAIL_MASK) || > >>+ (val == (_Q_LOCKED_VAL|_Q_PENDING_VAL))) > >> goto queue; > >>+ if (val == _Q_PENDING_VAL) { > >>+...

2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> > > Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending > bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second > cacheline. I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines: 1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning. 2) Pending VCPU gets descheduled. - we have PLE and lock holder isn't running [1] - th...

2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> > > Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending > bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second > cacheline. I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines: 1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning. 2) Pending VCPU gets descheduled. - we have PLE and lock holder isn't running [1] - th...

...ed. Signed-off-by: Rock Lee <zimilo@code-trick.com> --- utils.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c index 3c88d2e..7200aef 100644 --- a/utils.c +++ b/utils.c @@ -969,7 +969,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_dir(char *dirname, int run_ioctl) pending = malloc(sizeof(*pending)); if (!pending) return -ENOMEM; - strcpy(pending->name, dirname); + snprintf(pending->name, sizeof(pending->name), "%s", dirname); again: dirname_len = strlen(pending->name); @@ -1010,7 +1010,8 @@ again: ret = -ENOMEM; goto fail;...

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Thursday 5 September 20:03:17 UTC 2013 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: ndpi > tags 721551 + pending Bug #721551 [wnpp] ITP: ndpi -- extensible deep packet inspection library Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in NEW: findbugs > ta...

2014-05-21 18:49+0200, Radim Kr?m??: > 2014-05-19 16:17-0400, Waiman Long: > > As for now, I will focus on just having one pending bit. > > I'll throw some ideas at it, One of the ideas follows; it seems sound, but I haven't benchmarked it thoroughly. (Wasted a lot of time by writing/playing with various tools and loads.) Dbench on ext4 ramdisk, hackbench and ebizzy have shown a small improvement in perform...

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > package logcheck logcheck-database logtail Ignoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck-database logtail logcheck > tags 354820 + pending Bug#354820: rules to filter out entries caused by ssh scanners Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 355085 + pending Bug#355085: logcheck-database: Ignore smartd temperature messages within tolerances, please Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 356681 + pending Bug#356681:...

hi > I don't know if this is related but I also get quite a few of these error messages: > > Jan 31 14:10:46 auth: Warning: auth client 0 disconnected with 1 pending requests: Connection reset by peer my interpretation: a) you have a very very bz network ... the other end cannot respond to incoming requests even if your network is NOT bz, eg, no collision blinking on your hubs/switches, you are still having network problems b) if all of your doveco...

...to make > paravirt work. > > But as a general rule I like patches that start with something simple > and working and then optimize it, this series doesn't seem to quite > grasp that. > > > And to forcefully bring this thread a little bit on-topic: > > > > Pending-bit is effectively a lock in a lock, so I was wondering why > > don't we use more pending bits; advantages are the same, just diminished > > by the probability of having an ideally contended lock: > > - waiter won't be blocked on RAM access if critical section (or more...

...to make > paravirt work. > > But as a general rule I like patches that start with something simple > and working and then optimize it, this series doesn't seem to quite > grasp that. > > > And to forcefully bring this thread a little bit on-topic: > > > > Pending-bit is effectively a lock in a lock, so I was wondering why > > don't we use more pending bits; advantages are the same, just diminished > > by the probability of having an ideally contended lock: > > - waiter won't be blocked on RAM access if critical section (or more...

Hi all, I''m using my own OutputFormatter with /bin/spec to catch rspec results. I''m experiencing strange behaviour with pending specs and implementation_backtrace. This is my example_pending implementation in rspactor_formatter.rb: class RSpactorFormatter def example_pending(example, message) spec = SpecObject.new( :name => example.description, :example_group_name => @example_group....

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # via tagpending # # logcheck (1.3) unstable; urgency=low # # * Formalise the dropping of violations.d/logcheck. Please see # /usr/share/doc/logcheck-database/NEWS.Debian.gz for more information # (closes: #471072). # * Add Auto-Submitted header to outgoing mails (closes: #489172). # * ignore.d.server/...

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 # via tagpending # # logcheck (1.2.65) unstable; urgency=low # # * ignore.d.server/courier: # - update rules to include port information; thanks to Antoine Pardignon # (closes: #446310). # - ignore couriertcpd messages; thanks to Andrew Gallagher # (closes: #451118). # * ignore.d.server/smbd_a...

First of all, please direct me into how better to search existing threads in this mailing list. Ok to my rspec 2.0.1 mocha 0.9.8 issue: given a controller test before do subject.expects(:authenticate).once end it "should bla bla" do pending "PENDING, shouldn''t fail?" end with config.mock_with :rspec it''s ok: pending, but with config.mock_with :mocha if fails! It expected the authenticate to be called. What do I have to do to make it compatible? Reason for using mocha, is A: I''m used to...