search for: c95c

Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hello, Please consider removing xen. New xen-3.0 splited packages are upcoming, making this one obsolete. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // <julien@danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // The more we fly, the more we climb, the more we know that heaven is a lie. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debia...

Greetings Debian Xen team, I spent a weekend getting 3.0.2-testing building and thought i'd share the love. Manoj and I are already working to update make-kpkg for the new Xen architecture. My repo is at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/ I have posted a Breezy-centric howto for this build at: http://debian.thoughtcrime.co.nz/debian/README.txt Hope you enjoy it, and hope we can

# xm create -c vm01.cfg Error: Cannot open config file "vm01.cfg" www:/var/log/xen# xm create -c /etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg Using config file "/etc/xen/auto/vm01.cfg". Error: (22, 'Invalid argument') # xm log [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO (__init__:1072) Resource label file not found. [2006-10-24 16:16:30 xend.util.security 29229] INFO

I've noticed that with NetworkManager running in dom0, there is a lot of bad behaviour on the bridge interface After xend creates the bridge (using the sample network-bridge script in the package), the real interface is known as peth0 NetworkManager starts dhclient on peth0, which means the following: - peth0 gets it's own IP, maybe not the same as the bridge IP - a second default route

...f3d83a68b0332e6cbc9127d278665d25ee2894c http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/xcb-util-0.3.1.tar.bz2 md5: 3dcdda196ba5ddfd38194cdd29bd97e9 sha1: 1a4e6fe7aec6e846e2440393e43a83c7fe4ff7bd Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ? <julien at danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/attachments/20081120/eedd7dc1/attachment.pgp

...sha1: faef95bb732d1a1fd727fb750238e1dba9e94f69 http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/xcb-util-0.3.2.tar.bz2 md5: fa41a147f5a63b01207cfd975fecc45c sha1: 6550b1dbcd93ccab1aca94caba7346c2ff22ec5a -- Julien Danjou // ? <julien at danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/attachments/20081216/361f1788/attachment.pgp

...1: 9c1c256b9bcfe78cb99a15b567ca00ffb9a45c1e http://xcb.freedesktop.org/dist/libxcb-1.2.tar.bz2 md5: ae32b7846a7d83f5ec542a5431117564 sha1: 12be595ce1e26da3b63e6a17a47ab9392259f10f Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ? <julien at danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // Trust no one. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg-announce/attachments/20090217/ea2d41d5/atta...

...B does not return "public" as namespace :-( Is this a bug in dovecot, a bug in Claws mail, or a misconfiguration of my dovecot server? I can provide more info if needed. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ? <julien at danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // There is nothing under this line. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20091002/d5735...

...xen itself, at some point! Right. > Ok, subscribing to that so we can stop all this "cc" madness! ;) First. ;) Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060214/8a300c25/attachment.pgp

Okay since we have a few more people on the list now I see I wanted to get peoples input on a couple things. First of all, I'd like to work on general consensus so I'd like to see what people think of having the list setup to reply back to the list. I know some lists use this and some don't so I'd like to get input on the matter. I'd also like to get input on choice

...from Xen 2.0.6 this week end. Is there anything that we have to do before uploading this package? Some point we haven't treated yet? -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060223/a0912af3/attachment.pgp

Hi, One last thought... We haven't heard anything back from Bastian (for which I'm sorry, I would really have liked if he had joined us) and in the meantime consensus seem to have formed on -kernel and -devel, or at least there was no more answers... Which means at least people don't disagree strongly with the conclusions taken... In the meantime, though, there's still the upload

...I plan to upload real and official backports to backports.org as soon as we will upload a version to sid. Any comment welcome, Cheers, -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060227/fd5ca870/attachment.pgp

...000) # touch /etc/ld.so.hwnocap # ldd /bin/echo libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40021000) I think this could help us. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060301/f5aa6afa/attachment.pgp

Hi folks There are still some solutions missing in both trunk trees: - Patches from trunk (3.0) - udev symlink handling (both) A package is not allowed to put symlinks into /etc/udev/rules.d, it have to create it on the first installation and remove it on purge. - postint script needs to create /var/lib/xenstored (both) - initscript needs to create /var/run/xenstored (both) /var/run may be

...rder to upload it as soon as possible. If your discover any bug, any strange behaviour or any missing things, please do report it here. -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian Developer : :' : http://julien.danjou.info `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 191 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20060321/c55ec746/attachment.pgp

Hi everybody! At least xen 3.0 packages seem to be working, tested, and in a pretty good shape... (I haven't personally tested xen-unstable, so I cannot say) I propose releasing rev150 in unstable or at least experimental in the next few days... No, this is not a late april's fool... :D Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? Rants? Guido

I am using the "tha" Xen packages from http://packages.debianbase.de/sarge/amd64/xen3/ However, I noticed that some new packages have been uploaded into the NEW queue. What I am wondering is if/when/where the Sarge packages will be made available. If there is no current plan to make them available, I would be happy to help in any way that I can. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez

xen-3.0_3.0.2+hg9611-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xen-3.0_3.0.2+hg9611-1.dsc xen-3.0_3.0.2+hg9611.orig.tar.gz xen-3.0_3.0.2+hg9611-1.diff.gz xen-docs-3.0_3.0.2+hg9611-1_all.deb xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386_3.0.2+hg9611-1_i386.deb xen-hypervisor-3.0-i386-pae_3.0.2+hg9611-1_i386.deb xen-utils-3.0_3.0.2+hg9611-1_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian

Dear all, If I want to build a box which is mainly full of packages from the stable distribution but for the minor addition of this crazy Xen 3.x thing, what's the best way to go about it ? I think I'll need to compile my own kernels, but do I need to compile the userland Xen stuff too, or is there a semi-official backport ? Reading the archives suggests various packages in various