Alan Pevec
2009-Sep-16 15:13 UTC
[Fwd: Re: [Ovirt-devel] [PATCH node-image] keep NIC and HBA firmwares]
Forwarding to the list for Jay or Scott to have a look. Ignazio, do you see any more details (traceback or something) in the rails log? -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: ignazio.cassano at provincia.torino.it Subject: Re: [Ovirt-devel] [PATCH node-image] keep NIC and HBA firmwares Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:48:47 +0200 Size: 4031 URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ovirt-devel/attachments/20090916/bab5b806/attachment.eml>
ignazio.cassano at provincia.torino.it
2009-Sep-16 15:36 UTC
[Fwd: Re: [Ovirt-devel] [PATCH node-image] keep NIC and HBA firmwares]
When I try to start the vm , in rails.log the following is reported: Processing VmController#show (for 192.168.1.8 at 2009-09-16 17:35:32) [GET] Parameters: {"id"=>"3"} Rendering template within layouts/selection Rendering vm/show Completed in 71ms (View: 17, LDAP: 0, DB: 23) | 200 OK [http://192.168.1.8/ovirt/vm/show/3] Processing ResourcesController#vm_actions (for 192.168.1.8 at 2009-09-16 17:35:34) [POST] Parameters: {"id"=>"5", "vm_action"=>"start_vm", "vm_ids"=>"3"} ApplicationService::PartialSuccessError (start_vm failed for some VMs): app/services/vm_resource_pool_service.rb:102:in `svc_vm_actions' app/controllers/resources_controller.rb:94:in `vm_actions' Rendering template within layouts/confirmation Rendering resources/vm_actions Processing TreeController#return_filtered_list (for 192.168.1.8 at 2009-09-16 17:35:35) [POST] Parameters: {"item"=>["4-Smart Pools", "7-ovirt", "1-default", "5-test", "8-ovirt"]} Completed in 24ms (View: 2, LDAP: 0, DB: 44) | 200 OK [http://192.168.1.8/ovirt/tree/return_filtered_list] Processing TreeController#return_filtered_list (for 192.168.1.8 at 2009-09-16 17:35:50) [POST] Parameters: {"item"=>["4-Smart Pools", "7-ovirt", "1-default", "5-test", "8-ovirt"]} Completed in 29ms (View: 2, LDAP: 0, DB: 6) | 200 OK [http://192.168.1.8/ovirt/tree/return_filtered_list] ----- Messaggio da apevec at redhat.com --------- Data: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:13:20 +0200 Da: Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> Rispondi-A:Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> Oggetto: [Fwd: Re: [Ovirt-devel] [PATCH node-image] keep NIC and HBA firmwares] A: "ovirt-devel at redhat.com" <ovirt-devel at redhat.com>> Forwarding to the list for Jay or Scott to have a look. > > Ignazio, do you see any more details (traceback or something) in the > rails log?----- Fine del messaggio da apevec at redhat.com -----
Scott Seago
2009-Sep-16 16:07 UTC
[Fwd: Re: [Ovirt-devel] [PATCH node-image] keep NIC and HBA firmwares]
Alan Pevec wrote:> Forwarding to the list for Jay or Scott to have a look. > > Ignazio, do you see any more details (traceback or something) in the > rails log? >Unavailable action simply means that 'start vm' is not a valid action for that VM right now. If you go to the details pane for the VM you'll see that 'start' isn't in the actions list. What actions do appear there? What are the 'state' and 'pending state' values shown on the details pane? Is your host available (and showing up as available on the HW pool's hosts tab)? Scott> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Re: [Ovirt-devel] [PATCH node-image] keep NIC and HBA firmwares > From: > ignazio.cassano at provincia.torino.it > Date: > Wed, 16 Sep 2009 16:48:47 +0200 > To: > Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> > > To: > Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> > > > > Thank you Alan. > Now my note appears available on ovirt web interface. > I added a iscsi storage. > When I try to start a virtual machine , web intervace reports: > > "unavailable action" > > ----- Messaggio da apevec at redhat.com --------- > Data: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:23:11 +0200 > Da: Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> > Rispondi-A:Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> > Oggetto: Re: [Ovirt-devel] [PATCH node-image] keep NIC and HBA firmwares > A: ignazio.cassano at provincia.torino.it > > >> ignazio.cassano at provincia.torino.it wrote: >>> Good Morning Alan, >>> you email means I can rebuild ovirt and resolve my problem on >>> Broadcom bnx2 ? >> >> Yes, I've just pushed the patch to 'next' git branch, pull it and >> rebuild the node image. >> >> Thanks, >> Alan > > > ----- Fine del messaggio da apevec at redhat.com ----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Ovirt-devel mailing list > Ovirt-devel at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/ovirt-devel >