Tmima Pliroforikis Perifereiakis Enotitas Pierias
2012-May-10 08:09 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Two servers with redundant supplies on two UPSs
Scenario: * Two windows 2003 servers (different models) * Each server has two PSUs * Each server has a single serial port * Two UPSs are available of the exact same type (XPower Tigra 1kVA). Each has a serial port * The 1st PSU of each server is powered by the 1st UPS * The 2nd PSU of each server is powered by the 2nd UPS I am trying to install NUT on the best "optimal" way for these two systems. My obvious solution so far is: Implementation 1: * Connect 1st ups via serial to 1st server and 2nd ups via serial to 2nd server * Setup nut on both systems on standalone mode. I'd obviously prefer a clean master-slave relationship, but since each server has a single serial port, I can't do that. Any better ways to do this? Just asking :) Thanks again for your time. With kind regards, Michail.-
Ingo Schaefer
2012-May-10 08:26 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Two servers with redundant supplies on two UPSs
Hello, Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2012, 11:09 +0300 schrieb Tmima Pliroforikis Perifereiakis Enotitas Pierias:> > * Two windows 2003 servers (different models) > * Each server has two PSUs > * Each server has a single serial port > * Two UPSs are available of the exact same type (XPower Tigra 1kVA). > Each has a serial port > * The 1st PSU of each server is powered by the 1st UPS > * The 2nd PSU of each server is powered by the 2nd UPS > > I am trying to install NUT on the best "optimal" way for these two > systems. My obvious solution so far is: > > Implementation 1: > * Connect 1st ups via serial to 1st server and 2nd ups via serial to 2nd > server > * Setup nut on both systems on standalone mode. > > I'd obviously prefer a clean master-slave relationship, but since each > server has a single serial port, I can't do that. Any better ways to do > this? Just asking :)See http://www.networkupstools.org/docs/user-manual.chunked/ar01s06.html#BigServers for some implementation hints So if you set up both servers beeing the master for one UPS and monitoring both with "minsupplies 1" that would do the trick. So Server 1 is master for UPS 1 and slave to server 2/UPS 2; Server 2 ist master for UPS 2 and slave to server 1/UPS 1. You should not forget to have a redundant power supply on the network switch between these two servers as well or maybe a direct network cable connection between both servers. (I once had servers running until the ups powered off, because the server runnung nut master was the only one shut down correctly. The others lost connection to nut because one of the switches was not connected to the UPS) Kind regards, Ingo -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20120510/106c2915/attachment-0001.pgp>
Tmima Pliroforikis Perifereiakis Enotitas Pierias
2012-May-10 10:25 UTC
[Nut-upsuser] Two servers with redundant supplies on two UPSs
Hello Ingo, your comments were most appreciated, especially the following: Ingo Schaefer wrote:> You should not forget to have a redundant power supply on the network > switch between these two servers as well or maybe a direct network cable > connection between both servers. > > (I once had servers running until the ups powered off, because the > server runnung nut master was the only one shut down correctly. The > others lost connection to nut because one of the switches was not > connected to the UPS)I have a switch which takes its power from the first UPS, so the setup is definitely not symmetrical here. Thanks again for your kind comments. BR.-