Nut upsuser - Aug 2005 - problem with USB conection

Regards
I am installing NUT for the UPS Skate UPS-2200D, the UPS have conection with USB
to PC and i have problems to configure  nut
the ups is conected and Linux report this config
Aug 19 23:34:56 dakota kernel: [22393.099595] usb 2-2: new low speed USB device
using uhci_hcd and address 7
Aug 19 23:35:06 dakota kernel: [22403.186326] usb 2-2: Product: MEC0002
Aug 19 23:35:06 dakota kernel: [22403.186333] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: MEC
Aug 19 23:35:06 dakota kernel: [22403.291219] hiddev96: USB HID v1.00 Device
[MEC MEC0002] on usb-0000:00:1d.0-2
I assume the /dev/usb/hiddev96 for the UPS, is ok?
i am configured the NUT with this mini How-TO
http://fedoranews.org/contributors/kazutoshi_morioka/nut/
but i have two problems 
into /etc/sysconfig/ups
 
# UPS device - needed if UPS is locally attached
DEVICE= -> whta is the correct config?into /etc/ups/ups.conf [myups]
       driver = newhidups
       port = autois correct auto or /dev/usb/hiddev96  ???i need help, is
possible configure this ups with nut?regards and sorry for my
englishdakota@dakotabcn.netAdministrador Servidor dakotabcn.netLINUX Registrered
USER 93707 :)P.o Box 57908913 Badalona (Barcelona) SPAINfirmas GnuPG en
http://pgp.escomposlinux.org/dakota@menta.net || dakota@escomposlinux.org-
EquiposPIV 2.2 Ghz - 1.5 Gb RAM - W-XP Pro SP2Dual Xeon 2.8Ghz - 1 Gb Ram -
Linux Fedora Core 2Firma para spammers: test@spamout.com.ar (no usar!!!)

> I am installing NUT for the UPS Skate UPS-2200D, the UPS have conection
with USB to PC and i have problems to configure  nut
> the ups is conected and Linux report this config
> Aug 19 23:34:56 dakota kernel: [22393.099595] usb 2-2: new low speed USB
device using uhci_hcd and address 7
> Aug 19 23:35:06 dakota kernel: [22403.186326] usb 2-2: Product: MEC0002
> Aug 19 23:35:06 dakota kernel: [22403.186333] usb 2-2: Manufacturer: MEC
> Aug 19 23:35:06 dakota kernel: [22403.291219] hiddev96: USB HID v1.00
Device [MEC MEC0002] on usb-0000:00:1d.0-2
> I assume the /dev/usb/hiddev96 for the UPS, is ok?
> i am configured the NUT with this mini How-TO
> http://fedoranews.org/contributors/kazutoshi_morioka/nut/
> but i have two problems
> into /etc/sysconfig/ups
> # UPS device - needed if UPS is locally attached
> DEVICE= -> whta is the correct config?
"auto" should be fine. In fact, this part is redundant with
the ups.conf file. Will be addressed with the NUT Packaging
Standard effort.

IIRC, the sysconfig file was present the allow a central
settings, but putting "upsdrvctl" as the driver and leaving
the rest alone, having the ups/*.conf files configured
should work too.
> into /etc/ups/ups.conf [myups]
> driver = newhidups
> port = auto is correct auto or /dev/usb/hiddev96  ???
"auto" is fine too. Contrarily to hidups, newhidups use
libusb (not linux hid/hiddev specific stack) and has the
hability to auto detect the first local UPS.

But it also need to know how to translate (look up)
between the UPS internal HID data and the NUT
formalism. Have a look at the various mail about
newhidups and other manufacturers, mostly on
the upsdev list archives to see how to get the
supported data and how to create a lookup table
for your UPS.

Arnaud Quette
---
Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt
OpenSource Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/
Debian Developer - http://people.debian.org/~aquette/
 ... and much more ...

Hello!
>> # UPS device - needed if UPS is locally attached
>> DEVICE= -> whta is the correct config?
> 
> "auto" should be fine. In fact, this part is redundant with
> the ups.conf file. Will be addressed with the NUT Packaging
> Standard effort.
> IIRC, the sysconfig file was present the allow a central
> settings, but putting "upsdrvctl" as the driver and leaving
> the rest alone, having the ups/*.conf files configured
> should work too.
> 
in source the /etc/sysconfig/ups not exist
I ignore this file

>> into /etc/ups/ups.conf [myups]
>> driver = newhidups
>> port = auto is correct auto or /dev/usb/hiddev96  ???
> 
> "auto" is fine too. Contrarily to hidups, newhidups use
> libusb (not linux hid/hiddev specific stack) and has the
> hability to auto detect the first local UPS.
> 
> But it also need to know how to translate (look up)
> between the UPS internal HID data and the NUT
> formalism. Have a look at the various mail about
> newhidups and other manufacturers, mostly on
> the upsdev list archives to see how to get the
> supported data and how to create a lookup table
> for your UPS.
> 
> Arnaud Quette

In Cdrom is printed 
"Support SEC Protocol, USB Interface"

i hace read the README and probe this driver -> fentonups , the readme
indicate this driver for protocol MEGATEC, the original soft for this UPS is
Upsilon 2000 (the support from megatec confirm the NO support for linux and USB
:(
i have driver for protocol SEC and USB?
mmm google is my friend! 
http://www.die.net/doc/linux/man/man8/sec.8.html
but in bin not exist this driver, is older or integrated in other driver?


regards