Nut upsdev - Jul 2023 - Using common DCO for NUT

Hello fellow NUT developers!

  Some other projects nagged me to add a Signed-Off-By tag to my git
commits,
to show that I agree to code contribution terms, and I thought it would be
proper
to do the same in NUT. Proposed changes are detailed in:

* https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1994
* https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1995

  There are some wrinkles to iron out later (gotta run now), but generally
I intend
to move forward with merging this before long. What do you think?

Jim Klimov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20230718/30319c90/attachment.htm>

Jim Klimov via Nut-upsdev <nut-upsdev at alioth-lists.debian.net> writes:
> * https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/1994
> * https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/pull/1995
>
> There are some wrinkles to iron out later (gotta run now), but
> generally I intend to move forward with merging this before long. What
> do you think?
I'm kind of meh, as I see inbound=outbound as representing this anyway,
but it doesn't upset me.  However, it makes it less likely that I would
take other's code from the list and package it as PR.  However that is
already not that likely.

I don't know what to make of "you are encouraged to pgp sign
commits",
other than as a vague encouragement with no consequences for not doing
so and no plan to require it in the future.  Which means that I don't
intend to pay attention to that part, unless I decided to start doing
that in general for git.

I totally get the point, though.

This would not stop me at all from submitting my own work to nut.