search for: encouragement

On 15 Nov 2012, at 12:31, <dag at cray.com> wrote: > - Easier third-party merging. Merging via git merge/rebase is MUCH > simpler than merging a tarball from svn. I know the llvm leaders > don't seem to care about this but it is a real issue for many users. > > - Ease of fork/merge. git makes it easy to experiment with long-lived > development branches. svn

On 03/08/16 09:19, poma wrote: > > You don't seem to understand how the packages distribution works, > in this particular case, for Fedora 22. > I know far too well, which is exactly why I'm none too happy to encourage these particular practices. -hpa

How do I best encourage maintainers to update the software they are responsible for in various repositories? Akema Yagi made sure kmod-jfs for CentOS 7 was updated amazingly fast which is greatly appreciated. On the other hand, I have requested updates of some other software packages and have heard absolutely nothing in months...

Hello, I was just thinking about how to encourage software developers to publish games for platforms other than Win32. All is about marketing - even though game is working perfectly under Linux/WINE (for example - Prey), game publisher won't give any information about it. I was thinking about a certificate or something for software publishers. Something like a small label that you can

The following example in ?dump.frames options(error = quote({dump.frames(to.file = TRUE); q()})) is useful for teaching the user how to save a frame dump when R encounters an error during non-interactive sessions. This command however causes an additional change that on encountering an error R exits with a 0 error status. Although it's just an example, it's an important one as it's

I read through the editorial. This is the one of the most mega-ultra-super-biased articles I've ever read. e.g. The authors encourage Baysian methods, and literally encourage subjective approaches. However, there's only one reference to robust methods and one reference to nonparametric methods, both of which are labelled as purely exploratory methods, which I regard as extremely

On October 27, 2017 5:54:45 PM EDT, Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: >On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:32:03 -0400 >H wrote: > >> How do I best encourage maintainers to update the software they are >> responsible for in various repositories? > >If it's something that you need or want and it's not available in a >repo that you currently use you can compile

One thing that we are often blamed for is trying to stifle conversations and to discourage people from commenting / contributing / encouraging conversations. And that cant be further from the truth, really. We are all pro-community ( and when I say we, I mean everyone - including the contributors, developers, admins, users, abusers and hey upstream too ). However, one thing that does get in

On Jul 31, 2008, at 7:22 AM, Nicolas Capens wrote: > In the same breath I’d also like to kindly ask if someone could have > a look at the reverse operations, namely trunk from 128 to 64 bit > using movdq2q, and 128 to 32 and 64 to 32 using movd. This also > seems related to Bug 2585. Thanks again. The operations you're describing can be represented as insertelement and

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:32:03 -0400 H wrote: > How do I best encourage maintainers to update the software they are > responsible for in various repositories? If it's something that you need or want and it's not available in a repo that you currently use you can compile it yourself. I do that with a number of packages that are either newer or simply not available in the various

Signed-off-by: Chen Hanxiao <chenhanxiao@cn.fujitsu.com> --- src/guestfs.pod | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/guestfs.pod b/src/guestfs.pod index 377db21..70400a1 100644 --- a/src/guestfs.pod +++ b/src/guestfs.pod @@ -4158,10 +4158,6 @@ Runs the regular test suite. This is implemented using the regular automake C<TESTS> target. See the automake

Joris, With the large caveat that I am not Duncan, and thus am not speaking for him, I can see an argument for his claim that I think is, more or less, true. roxygen2 (as far as I know as someone who uses it at least some of the time) maps to only a subset of Rd. It is the most commonly used subset, and so you can do most common things with it, but I think a pretty good case can be made for the

Hi all, Today, we maintain a high bar for getting a new subproject into LLVM: first a subproject has to be built far enough along to “prove its worth” to be part of the LLVM monorepo (e.g. demonstrate community, etc). Once conceptually approved, it needs to follow all of the policies and practices expected by an LLVM subproject. This is problematic for a couple reasons: it implicitly means that

On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Lionel Henry <lionel at rstudio.com> wrote: > On 31 janv. 2018, at 09:08, Gabriel Becker <gmbecker at ucdavis.edu> wrote: > > > it *actively discourages* the bits it doesn't directly support. > > It may be discouraging to include Rd syntax in roxygen docs but only > because the LaTeX-like syntax of Rd is burdensome, not because

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 17:15:01 -0400 H wrote: > The graphical configuration utility for fcitx (fcitx-configtool) is missing I don't know anything about Chinese text rendering. > - The geany editor is missing the markdown plugin, this however, may shortly > be resolved. Check on my website. :) The rest of your stuff is easily dealt with by compiling the relevant Fedora rpms. >

On 29 October 2017 at 13:40, vychytraly . <vychytraly at gmail.com> wrote: > Frank please could you explain how to create rpms for el7 from fedora > src.rpms? > > You may find this a useful read: https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/11

For a number of years now, the Samba Team has been a member of the Software Freedom Conservancy. They handle quite a bit of administration for our project as well as pursuing GPL compliance. If you'd like to see more about what they do, please check: https://sfconservancy.org/about/ We urge you to support the Conservancy. Here is a message from our own Jeremy Allison:

On Thursday, 18 June 2020 06:11:18 CEST Andrew Bartlett via samba-technical wrote: > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 04:46 +0100, S?rgio Basto via samba wrote: > > On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 14:43 +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > > If we could get an even more modern version then we can consider > > > removing even more duplicate in-house cryptography. > > > >

On 4/27/07, David Chelimsky <dchelimsky at gmail.com> wrote: > Any other suggestions? > > In general, I''m much more inclined to favor an additional parameter > passed to #it over a new method name. Since I suggested in the other thread that perhaps during_event and on_event could append text to the spec string, here''s another similar (but simpler) suggestion

On 10/28/2017 12:28 PM, Japheth Cleaver wrote: > On 10/27/2017 2:54 PM, Frank Cox wrote: >> >> I do that with a number of packages that are either newer or simply >> not available in the various Centos repos.? In many cases it's as easy >> as downloading a new tar source file and adding it to the existing >> source rpm, doing three seconds of editing on the