Nouveau - Mar 2016 - [PATCH] fifo/gk104: kick channel upon removal

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Eric Biggers <ebiggers3 at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:59:05PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> Eric, since you reported the regression on the first version, would you
mind trying
>> this one and giving us your Tested-by? I have tested it on dGPU but
unfortunately
>> could not set it up in an optimus-like manner, with power management
kicking in.
>>
>
> Thanks.  I've tested Linux 4.5-rc6 with your patch applied, and
I've yet to
> encounter the crash after about half a dozen reboots.  So it seems good so
far,
> but I'll keep running it and will let you know if I notice a problem.
Great news, this one was bothering me for some time. Would be grateful
if you could let us know whether things are still going well after
further testing.

On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Eric Biggers <ebiggers3 at
gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:59:05PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>>
>>> Eric, since you reported the regression on the first version, would
you mind trying
>>> this one and giving us your Tested-by? I have tested it on dGPU but
unfortunately
>>> could not set it up in an optimus-like manner, with power
management kicking in.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks.  I've tested Linux 4.5-rc6 with your patch applied, and
I've yet to
>> encounter the crash after about half a dozen reboots.  So it seems good
so far,
>> but I'll keep running it and will let you know if I notice a
problem.
>
> Great news, this one was bothering me for some time. Would be grateful
> if you could let us know whether things are still going well after
> further testing.
Hi Eric, just to follow up - are you still happy with this patch?

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:10:16AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot
wrote:
> 
> Hi Eric, just to follow up - are you still happy with this patch?
Yes, I still haven't had any problems with it.