bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2016-Apr-21 15:35 UTC
[Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |netfilter at mva.name
--- Comment #1 from Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at
mva.name> ---
I'd also very appreciate CIDR support in named sets (it seems, it is already
supported in anonymous ones).
Also, it'd be nice to have inet_addr type (to be able to have both ipv4 and
ipv6 addresses in single set).
And, talking about reducing on "n" lines ? I'd disagree about
making it default
behaviour. It can be option for nft for that, but it shouldn't be default
behavior (and it is separate issue anyway).
// btw, ping any developers. It is silence for a more than year already
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20160421/2d3a86b2/attachment.html>
Reasonably Related Threads
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
