bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2016-Apr-21 15:35 UTC
[Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1009 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |netfilter at mva.name --- Comment #1 from Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov (mva) <netfilter at mva.name> --- I'd also very appreciate CIDR support in named sets (it seems, it is already supported in anonymous ones). Also, it'd be nice to have inet_addr type (to be able to have both ipv4 and ipv6 addresses in single set). And, talking about reducing on "n" lines ? I'd disagree about making it default behaviour. It can be option for nft for that, but it shouldn't be default behavior (and it is separate issue anyway). // btw, ping any developers. It is silence for a more than year already -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.netfilter.org/pipermail/netfilter-buglog/attachments/20160421/2d3a86b2/attachment.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets
- [Bug 1009] Ability to use CIDR notation in IPV4/IPV6 named sets