bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2013-Jun-24 21:34 UTC
[Bug 580] iptables-restore and iptables-save lack comparison of a saved ruleset against the currently deployed rules
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580 --- Comment #7 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-06-24 23:34:51 CEST ---> would you be thrilled if all the rules were in random order too?This comparison is a bit far fetched, given that ordering of rules is so important (accept before drop, etc). The order in which tables are output in iptables-save is largely irrelevant, except for the corner case this user is asking for. Otherwise many other users would be clamoring for it.> Because anything users have to construct above it > is going to be more error-proneRight, like the Nagios monitoring script this user is creating... But we'll leave this 4 year old request opened. Perhaps someone will get around to it someday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 580] iptables-restore and iptables-save lack comparison of a saved ruleset against the currently deployed rules
- [Bug 580] iptables-restore and iptables-save lack comparison of a saved ruleset against the currently deployed rules
- [Bug 580] iptables-restore and iptables-save lack comparison of a saved ruleset against the currently deployed rules
- [Bug 580] iptables-restore and iptables-save lack comparison of a saved ruleset against the currently deployed rules
- [Bug 580] New: iptables-restore and iptables-save lack comparison of a saved ruleset against the currently deployed rules