search for: clamoring

I'd like to take over LTO, unless someone else is clamoring for it. -bw

On Nov 16, 2012, at 12:47 PM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote: > I'd like to take over LTO, unless someone else is clamoring for it. Do you mean liblto specifically, the IR linker, or something else? This makes sense to me as long as it is well defined. -Chris

Here''s a simple one... When using in_place_edit fields, they don''t appear unless they already have a value. How can I get similar functionality when they are empty? Thanks, Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060511/a98640cf/attachment.html

------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:09:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Terry Therneau <therneau at mayo.edu> Subject: RE: Problem with coxme To: jhz22 at medschl.cam.ac.uk Cc: R-help at stat.mat.ethz.ch, liulei at virginia.edu, spencer.graves at pdf.com Content-MD5: BXKVsHtW/1I9mIUqrXBU0g== The original question involved a strange error message from coxme

766z7813817h8nl54w77a6hm9e227x3 ed792014604cjg6w1199bc15624052z The demise of my hamster made me cry! lnterest rates are climbing! We do the work for you. By subrnitting your information across to hundreds of Ienders, we can get you the best interest rates around. Amber can be quite amiable when she wants to be. Imterest rates

Hey y'all -- I heard some discussion a while back about "bitrate stripping" to reduce filesize without re-encoding ... has this gone anywhere? Too lazy to write a re-encode script, Nate <p> --- nate - nmt2002@columbia.edu cell=917 445 6830 aim=mediumnate abolishthe.us/gpgpublickey Nobody for president. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg

...in random order too? This comparison is a bit far fetched, given that ordering of rules is so important (accept before drop, etc). The order in which tables are output in iptables-save is largely irrelevant, except for the corner case this user is asking for. Otherwise many other users would be clamoring for it. > Because anything users have to construct above it > is going to be more error-prone Right, like the Nagios monitoring script this user is creating... But we'll leave this 4 year old request opened. Perhaps someone will get around to it someday. -- Configure bugmail: https:...

I've got an open bug regarding version 1.4. When I tried to find a 'stable' version I tried 1.2.18, it had the same problem. I then tried 1.2.13 and the server hasn't had an issue since. -----Original Message----- From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Jaswinder Singh Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:08 PM To:

Dear all: Professor Ripley commented: > Note that libEMF's help page says > > It is also possible now to generate EMF files from PSTOEDIT > on POSIX > systems. Therefore, if your graphics code only outputs > PostScript, you > can now easily convert it to EMF. > > but that is only true on Windows (unfortunately). > Actually I have had some luck

...ign: >> 1. Do you think this is a useful check? > > That's actually an interesting questions. It could be useful for tagged > unions although I believe programmers usually surround them with > checking asserts anyway. Useful, yes. It will find bugs. I haven't heard anyone clamoring for it though. >> 2. Where can I store type and field info about the union; some form of >> a shadow memory or a simple array/map? > > Without shadow it may be unacceptably slow in union-intensive > applications. But with shadow, it'll greatly complicate UBSan. None of t...

Just adding to the clamor for FileChecks ability to pattern match out-of-order (match for mere presence); Just in the last 2 weeks, I have come across at least a couple instances when I was unable to add small unit tests to the testsuite because of this deficiency in FileCheck. Also, I agree with Krzysztof about the lack of any real recurring overhead. Can this feature please be added to

...d is ugly. Such hacks really > shouldn't be needed in 2013, particularly when LLVM already went to > the trouble of supporting TCO for exactly these good reasons. > > The JVM made this mistake in its byte code and many groups such as the > Clojure and Scala communities have been clamoring for years to get TCO > into the JVM. ECMAScript has this error as well, but it's forgivable > as Javascript wasn't originally intended to be, as it is now, a > compiler target. > > Indeed, I believe much of the enthusiasm for (P)NaCL stems from the > hope that we'll f...

...e compiler front-end, and is ugly. Such hacks really shouldn't be needed in 2013, particularly when LLVM already went to the trouble of supporting TCO for exactly these good reasons. The JVM made this mistake in its byte code and many groups such as the Clojure and Scala communities have been clamoring for years to get TCO into the JVM. ECMAScript has this error as well, but it's forgivable as Javascript wasn't originally intended to be, as it is now, a compiler target. Indeed, I believe much of the enthusiasm for (P)NaCL stems from the hope that we'll finally be able to compile arb...

This thread (... Tomcat ...) emphasizes the essential conundrom of CentOS whose mission is to provide a community-based, well-maintained and freely distributable version of the stable enterprise software from the Well Known North American VENDOR (WKNAV). There is a essential gap betweenthe community (I want lots of current packages) and the WKNAV base (you get what I choose to provide). As CentOS

...ither the mailbox gets forgotten about when a secretary changes, the password gets lost, or everyone on campus ends up with the password), so our policies require such generic accounts to be forwarded to a folder in a "real person's" account. This works well for us, but the users are clamoring for the ability to have more than one person access those folders. The problem with Courier's shared folders is that one person owns the folder and while others can see that mailbox, only the owner has write access. This kills most of the utility of shared folders, except for use as announcem...

...ompiler front-end, and is ugly. Such hacks really shouldn't be needed in 2013, particularly when LLVM already went to the trouble of supporting TCO for exactly these good reasons. The JVM made this mistake in its byte code and many groups such as the Clojure and Scala communities have been clamoring for years to get TCO into the JVM. ECMAScript has this error as well, but it's forgivable as Javascript wasn't originally intended to be, as it is now, a compiler target. Indeed, I believe much of the enthusiasm for (P)NaCL stems from the hope that we'll finally be able to compile...

4 Rail Environments Upgraded. 0 Problems. Great work everyone, I really appreciate it. ~ Ben -- Ben Reubenstein http://www.benr75.com

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Pranav Bhandarkar <pranavb at codeaurora.org>wrote: > Just adding to the clamor for FileChecks ability to pattern match > out-of-order (match for mere presence); Just in the last 2 weeks, I have > come across at least a couple instances when I was unable to add small unit > tests to the testsuite because of this deficiency in FileCheck. Also, I

I there was a discussion on the vorbis list about Real Audio SureStream (tm) format. The basic idea was that they put multiple RA files with different compression levels. So when they have to switch the bit rate due to bandwidth changes, they choose from the streams they have. Since peeling is a long time away, it could be implemented with ogg vorbis multiplexing several times the same

Hello, Following an earlier email ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2013-June/063010.html), we've published an initial version of the PNaCl bitcode reference manual online - http://www.chromium.org/nativeclient/pnacl/bitcode-abi. The PNaCl bitcode is a restricted subset of LLVM IR. The reference manual is quite terse, so for the bigger picture I'll repost links to the design