Logcheck devel - Feb 2005 - Rename violations.ignore.d/logcheck-pureftp

<nitpickyness>

To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd,
or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)?

Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way?

</nitpickyness>

-j
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url :
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20050220/ad9db1ea/attachment.pgp

On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> <nitpickyness>
> 
> To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd,
> or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)?
> 
> Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way?
> 
> </nitpickyness>
feel free to rename,
as noone voiced against. :)

shouldn't make any diference.


--
maks