owner 244411 !
thanks
Hi!
I've taken a look at the code, and found the following:
#v+
db_get logcheck-database/security_level
linkfile logcheck.ignore $RET
linkfile ignore.d $RET
#v-
It is no wonder that it fails on non-interactive debconf frontend...
Sorry, strangly it wasn't reported before. I am going to check with both
the security team and the stable release manager if a fix for that
problem has a chance to be accepted for woody, and will prepare a fix
for it. It would be something along this oneline pseudodiff fix:
#v+
db_get logcheck-database/security_level
+RET=${RET:-workstation}
linkfile logcheck.ignore $RET
linkfile ignore.d $RET
#v-
I have to check if that construct is bashism or if it is portable
amongst the different shells.
So long,
Alfie
--
[It is] best to confuse only one issue at a time.
-- K&R
Debian Bug Tracking System
2004-Jun-04 14:33 UTC
[Logcheck-devel] Processed: working on it
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:> owner 244411 !Bug#244411: logcheck: Upgrade loses symlinks in /etc/logcheck Owner recorded as Gerfried Fuchs <alfie at debian.org>.> thanksStopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:> I've taken a look at the code, and found the following: > > #v+ > db_get logcheck-database/security_level > linkfile logcheck.ignore $RET > linkfile ignore.d $RET > #v- > > It is no wonder that it fails on non-interactive debconf frontend... > Sorry, strangly it wasn't reported before. I am going to check with both > the security team and the stable release manager if a fix for that > problem has a chance to be accepted for woody, and will prepare a fix > for it. It would be something along this oneline pseudodiff fix: > > #v+ > db_get logcheck-database/security_level > +RET=${RET:-workstation} > linkfile logcheck.ignore $RET > linkfile ignore.d $RET > #v- > > I have to check if that construct is bashism or if it is portable > amongst the different shells. > > So long, > Alfie > -- > [It is] best to confuse only one issue at a time. > -- K&Rforwarding Alfie's post to the correct bug and bug-issuer. aboves bugs will get corrected in woody. a++ maks -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/logcheck-devel/attachments/20040607/de386ec6/attachment.pgp