On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:41 AM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:> > > On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > How do you run it? > > The repository is supposed to be cloned into llvm/tools/clang/test and > will then appear as part of check-clang. > > > It doesn't appear to be based on lit, any particular reason? > > It is most definitely based on lit. >Hmm, I'm using a mono-repo and it appears under a top-level debuginfo-tests folder that doesn't have any lit configuration files. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170907/40b43a36/attachment.html>
Yea, sorry, see above. I meant llvm, not lldb. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote:> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:41 AM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote: > >> >> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: >> > How do you run it? >> >> The repository is supposed to be cloned into llvm/tools/clang/test and >> will then appear as part of check-clang. >> >> > It doesn't appear to be based on lit, any particular reason? >> >> It is most definitely based on lit. >> > > Hmm, I'm using a mono-repo and it appears under a top-level > debuginfo-tests folder that doesn't have any lit configuration files. >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170907/4900c6b1/attachment.html>
> On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:41 AM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com <mailto:aprantl at apple.com>> wrote: > > > On Sep 7, 2017, at 11:23 AM, Zachary Turner <zturner at google.com <mailto:zturner at google.com>> wrote: > > How do you run it? > > The repository is supposed to be cloned into llvm/tools/clang/test and will then appear as part of check-clang. > > > It doesn't appear to be based on lit, any particular reason? > > It is most definitely based on lit. > > Hmm, I'm using a mono-repo and it appears under a top-level debuginfo-tests folder that doesn't have any lit configuration files.That's a bug in the monorepo :-) More seriously: This is probably a good idea. This way people who want to run them, can symlink them into llvm/tools/clang/test. They don't have a lit configuration because they expect to be checked out into clang's test directory. -- adrian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170907/7c756f93/attachment.html>
They don't have a lit configuration because they expect to be checked out into clang's test directory. It might be nice if it had one that returns Unsupported when target != host. Not sure how to express that in lit-speak though. --paulr -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170907/fdebbd24/attachment.html>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:51 AM Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com> wrote:> > That's a bug in the monorepo :-) > More seriously: This is probably a good idea. This way people who want to > run them, can symlink them into llvm/tools/clang/test. >cmake -DCLANG_ENABLE_DEBUGINFO_TESTS=ON ? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170907/9340e481/attachment.html>