thr3ads.net - llvm dev - [llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info [Jun 2017]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev

2017-Jun-15 22:24 UTC

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

Can you send me a patch with instructions to reproduce? I can take a look.

-- adrian> On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
> 
> Yes, it does for us. My tree is couple days off the tip, and I see it
there.
>  
> Sergei
>  
> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
Keno Fischer via llvm-dev
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
> To: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info
>  
> This all looks very similar to a bug in the cloning stuff I fixed recently,
so would be indeed good to know if this is still happening on master.
>  
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> If you are doing this work based off LLVM trunk, could you send me your
patch to reproduce the problem?
>>  
>> -- adrian
>>> On Jun 15, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Bernad via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
wrote:
>>>  
>>> Hi!
>>>  
>>> We are currently working on a science project and implemented a
FunctionPass that clones a function (more precisely a constructor of a
struct/class) and adds a parameter.
>>>  
>>> First, we create a new function with a new function type, which
includes the newly added parameter:
>>>  
>>>> Function *NF = Function::Create(NewFTy, F.getLinkage(),
F.getName() + "Cloned", F.getParent());
>>>  
>>> and after setting up the ValueToValueMapTy, we use the
CloneFunctionInto method to clone the function body
>>>  
>>>> CloneFunctionInto(NF, &F, Map, true, Returns,
"Cloned");
>>>  
>>> The code seems to work as intended, but when we try to emit debug
symbols (clang -g flag) the pass fails with following message:
>>> 
>>>> "All DICompileUnits must be listed in llvm.dbg.cu
<http://llvm.dbg.cu/>"
>>>  
>>> Nevertheless, we can dump the Module and therefore can print out
the annotated IR.
>>>  
>>> This is what the function to be cloned looks like:
>>>  
>>>> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
>>>> define linkonce_odr void
@_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev(%struct.MyFunnyClass* %this) unnamed_addr #4 comdat align
2 !dbg !46 {
>>>> entry:
>>>>   %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8
>>>>   store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass**
%this.addr, align 8
>>>>   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.MyFunnyClass**
%this.addr, metadata !49, metadata !31), !dbg !50
>>>> ... rest of function code
>>>> }
>>>>  
>>>> !46 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass",
linkageName: "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !15, file: !1, line: 1,
type: !25, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags:
DIFlagArtificial | DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, declaration:
!47, variables: !2)
>>>  
>>> and the cloned function:
>>>  
>>>> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
>>>> define linkonce_odr void
@_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2EvCloned(%struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, { [6 x i8*] }*
%newparam) unnamed_addr #4 align 2 !dbg !73 {
>>>> entry:
>>>>   %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8
>>>>   store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass**
%this.addr, align 8
>>>>   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.MyFunnyClass**
%this.addr, metadata !89, metadata !31), !dbg !91
>>>> ... rest of function code
>>>> }
>>>>  
>>>> !73 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass",
linkageName: "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !74, file: !1, line: 1,
type: !81, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags:
DIFlagArtificial | DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !87, declaration:
!88, variables: !2)
>>>>  
>>> So the cloned function gets annotated with debug symbols as
expected. We noticed that the linkageName of the cloned function is the same as
the original one's. Could that cause the error mentioned above? If so, how
can we fix that error?
>>>  
>>> Best regards and thanks in advance,
>>> Matthias
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
>>  
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170615/ebf20f64/attachment.html>

Keno Fischer via llvm-dev

2017-Jun-15 22:34 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

The CompileUnit is not supposed to be duplicated on master:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/e3e43d9d574cf0a829e9a58525372ba0868a3292/lib/Transforms/Utils/CloneFunction.cpp#L129-L141.
Is there no subprogram attached to your function, but somehow the CU is
referenced anyway?

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
wrote:
> Can you send me a patch with instructions to reproduce? I can take a look.
>
> -- adrian
>
> On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
>
> Yes, it does for us. My tree is couple days off the tip, and I see it
> there.
>
> Sergei
>
> *From:* llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org
> <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>] *On Behalf Of *Keno Fischer via
> llvm-dev
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
> *To:* Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
> *Cc:* llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info
>
> This all looks very similar to a bug in the cloning stuff I fixed
> recently, so would be indeed good to know if this is still happening on
> master.
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> If you are doing this work based off LLVM trunk, could you send me your
> patch to reproduce the problem?
>
> -- adrian
>
> On Jun 15, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Bernad via llvm-dev <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We are currently working on a science project and implemented a
> FunctionPass that clones a function (more precisely a constructor of a
> struct/class) and adds a parameter.
>
> First, we create a new function with a new function type, which includes
> the newly added parameter:
>
>
> Function *NF = Function::Create(NewFTy, F.getLinkage(), F.getName() +
> "Cloned", F.getParent());
>
>
> and after setting up the ValueToValueMapTy, we use the CloneFunctionInto
> method to clone the function body
>
>
> CloneFunctionInto(NF, &F, Map, true, Returns, "Cloned");
>
>
>
> The code seems to work as intended, but when we try to emit debug symbols
> (clang -g flag) the pass fails with following message:
>
> "All DICompileUnits must be listed in llvm.dbg.cu"
>
>
> Nevertheless, we can dump the Module and therefore can print out the
> annotated IR.
>
> This is what the function to be cloned looks like:
>
>
> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
> define linkonce_odr void @_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev(%struct.MyFunnyClass*
> %this) unnamed_addr #4 comdat align 2 !dbg !46 {
> entry:
>   %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8
>   store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
> align 8
>   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
> metadata !49, metadata !31), !dbg !50
>
> ... rest of function code
>
> }
>
> !46 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass", linkageName:
> "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !15, file: !1, line: 1, type:
!25, isLocal:
> false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial |
> DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, declaration: !47,
> variables: !2)
>
>
> and the cloned function:
>
>
> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
> define linkonce_odr void @_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2EvCloned(%struct.MyFunnyClass*
> %this, { [6 x i8*] }* %newparam) unnamed_addr #4 align 2 !dbg !73 {
> entry:
>   %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8
>   store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
> align 8
>   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
> metadata !89, metadata !31), !dbg !91
>
> ... rest of function code
>
> }
>
> !73 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass", linkageName:
> "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !74, file: !1, line: 1, type:
!81, isLocal:
> false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial |
> DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !87, declaration: !88,
> variables: !2)
>
>
> So the cloned function gets annotated with debug symbols as expected. We
> noticed that the linkageName of the cloned function is the same as the
> original one's. Could that cause the error mentioned above? If so, how
can
> we fix that error?
>
> Best regards and thanks in advance,
> Matthias
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170615/769074de/attachment.html>

Sergei Larin via llvm-dev

2017-Jun-16 20:54 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

Sorry. It takes a pass that was not accepted for upstreaming.. It uses
CloneFunctionInto with module level flag on. In the input IR there is a
strangely formed (but correct) debug info MD that causes duplication of
existing DICompileUnit during cloning, but llvm.dbg.cu is not updated. I got
around by a quick cleanup pass that detects the situation and simply adds
them in. Something like this:

 

  auto *CUs = F->getParent()->getNamedMetadata("llvm.dbg.cu");

  if (!CUs)

    return;

 

  SmallPtrSet<Metadata *, 2> Listed;

  Listed.insert(CUs->op_begin(), CUs->op_end());

 

  for (auto *CU : CUVisited)

    if (!Listed.count(CU)) {

      auto *Op = dyn_cast<MDNode>(CU);

      CUs->addOperand(Op); 
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

    }

 

Sorry, I realize this is not much help.

 

Sergei

 

From: aprantl at apple.com [mailto:aprantl at apple.com] 
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 5:25 PM
To: Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>
Cc: Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

 

Can you send me a patch with instructions to reproduce? I can take a look.

 

-- adrian

On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org
<mailto:slarin at codeaurora.org> > wrote:

 

Yes, it does for us. My tree is couple days off the tip, and I see it there.

 

Sergei

 

From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Keno
Fischer via llvm-dev
Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
To: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com <mailto:aprantl at apple.com>
>
Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> >
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

 

This all looks very similar to a bug in the cloning stuff I fixed recently,
so would be indeed good to know if this is still happening on master.

 

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev <
<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

If you are doing this work based off LLVM trunk, could you send me your
patch to reproduce the problem?

 

-- adrian

On Jun 15, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Bernad via llvm-dev <
<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:

 

Hi!

 

We are currently working on a science project and implemented a FunctionPass
that clones a function (more precisely a constructor of a struct/class) and
adds a parameter.

 

First, we create a new function with a new function type, which includes the
newly added parameter:

 

Function *NF = Function::Create(NewFTy, F.getLinkage(), F.getName() +
"Cloned", F.getParent());

 

and after setting up the ValueToValueMapTy, we use the CloneFunctionInto
method to clone the function body

 

CloneFunctionInto(NF, &F, Map, true, Returns, "Cloned");

 

The code seems to work as intended, but when we try to emit debug symbols
(clang -g flag) the pass fails with following message:

"All DICompileUnits must be listed in  <http://llvm.dbg.cu/>
llvm.dbg.cu"

 

Nevertheless, we can dump the Module and therefore can print out the
annotated IR.

 

This is what the function to be cloned looks like:

 

; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable

define linkonce_odr void @_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev(%struct.MyFunnyClass* %this)
unnamed_addr #4 comdat align 2 !dbg !46 {

entry:

  %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8

  store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
align 8

  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
metadata !49, metadata !31), !dbg !50

... rest of function code

}

 

!46 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass", linkageName:
"_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !15, file: !1, line: 1, type: !25,
isLocal:
false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial |
DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, declaration: !47, variables:
!2)

 

and the cloned function:

 

; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable

define linkonce_odr void @_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2EvCloned(%struct.MyFunnyClass*
%this, { [6 x i8*] }* %newparam) unnamed_addr #4 align 2 !dbg !73 {

entry:

  %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8

  store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
align 8

  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata %struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr,
metadata !89, metadata !31), !dbg !91

... rest of function code

}

 

!73 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "MyFunnyClass", linkageName:
"_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope: !74, file: !1, line: 1, type: !81,
isLocal:
false, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial |
DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false, unit: !87, declaration: !88,
variables: !2)

 

So the cloned function gets annotated with debug symbols as expected. We
noticed that the linkageName of the cloned function is the same as the
original one's. Could that cause the error mentioned above? If so, how can
we fix that error?

 

Best regards and thanks in advance,

Matthias

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
 <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
 <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

 


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
 <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
 <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170616/52fd2135/attachment.html>

Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev

2017-Jun-16 21:00 UTC

head link

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

The if you are cloning into the same LLVM module the CU should not cloned. If
don't mind sharing your code, I can try to help diagnose why the CU gets
cloned... just send me a patch that applies to trunk and instructions.

-- adrian
> On Jun 16, 2017, at 1:54 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>
wrote:
> 
> Sorry… It takes a pass that was not accepted for upstreaming…. It uses
CloneFunctionInto with module level flag on. In the input IR there is a
strangely formed (but correct) debug info MD that causes duplication of existing
DICompileUnit during cloning, but llvm.dbg.cu is not updated. I got around by a
quick cleanup pass that detects the situation and simply adds them in… Something
like this:
>  
>   auto *CUs =
F->getParent()->getNamedMetadata("llvm.dbg.cu");
>   if (!CUs)
>     return;
>  
>   SmallPtrSet<Metadata *, 2> Listed;
>   Listed.insert(CUs->op_begin(), CUs->op_end());
>  
>   for (auto *CU : CUVisited)
>     if (!Listed.count(CU)) {
>       auto *Op = dyn_cast<MDNode>(CU);
>       CUs->addOperand(Op); 
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
>     }
>  
> Sorry, I realize this is not much help.
>  
> Sergei
>  
> From: aprantl at apple.com [mailto:aprantl at apple.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 5:25 PM
> To: Sergei Larin <slarin at codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Keno Fischer <keno at juliacomputing.com>; llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info
>  
> Can you send me a patch with instructions to reproduce? I can take a look.
>  
> -- adrian
>> On Jun 15, 2017, at 2:23 PM, Sergei Larin <slarin at
codeaurora.org> wrote:
>>  
>> Yes, it does for us. My tree is couple days off the tip, and I see it
there.
>>  
>> Sergei
>>  
>> From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
Keno Fischer via llvm-dev
>> Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:25 PM
>> To: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>
>> Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info
>>  
>> This all looks very similar to a bug in the cloning stuff I fixed
recently, so would be indeed good to know if this is still happening on master.
>>  
>> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Adrian Prantl via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> If you are doing this work based off LLVM trunk, could you send me
your patch to reproduce the problem?
>>>  
>>> -- adrian
>>>> On Jun 15, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Matthias Bernad via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Hi!
>>>>  
>>>> We are currently working on a science project and implemented a
FunctionPass that clones a function (more precisely a constructor of a
struct/class) and adds a parameter.
>>>>  
>>>> First, we create a new function with a new function type, which
includes the newly added parameter:
>>>>  
>>>>> Function *NF = Function::Create(NewFTy, F.getLinkage(),
F.getName() + "Cloned", F.getParent());
>>>>  
>>>> and after setting up the ValueToValueMapTy, we use the
CloneFunctionInto method to clone the function body
>>>>  
>>>>> CloneFunctionInto(NF, &F, Map, true, Returns,
"Cloned");
>>>>  
>>>> The code seems to work as intended, but when we try to emit
debug symbols (clang -g flag) the pass fails with following message:
>>>> 
>>>>> "All DICompileUnits must be listed in
llvm.dbg.cu"
>>>>  
>>>> Nevertheless, we can dump the Module and therefore can print
out the annotated IR.
>>>>  
>>>> This is what the function to be cloned looks like:
>>>>  
>>>>> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
>>>>> define linkonce_odr void
@_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev(%struct.MyFunnyClass* %this) unnamed_addr #4 comdat align
2 !dbg !46 {
>>>>> entry:
>>>>>   %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8
>>>>>   store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass**
%this.addr, align 8
>>>>>   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata
%struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr, metadata !49, metadata !31), !dbg !50
>>>>> ... rest of function code
>>>>> }
>>>>>  
>>>>> !46 = distinct !DISubprogram(name:
"MyFunnyClass", linkageName: "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope:
!15, file: !1, line: 1, type: !25, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true,
scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial | DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false,
unit: !0, declaration: !47, variables: !2)
>>>>  
>>>> and the cloned function:
>>>>  
>>>>> ; Function Attrs: noinline nounwind uwtable
>>>>> define linkonce_odr void
@_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2EvCloned(%struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, { [6 x i8*] }*
%newparam) unnamed_addr #4 align 2 !dbg !73 {
>>>>> entry:
>>>>>   %this.addr = alloca %struct.MyFunnyClass*, align 8
>>>>>   store %struct.MyFunnyClass* %this, %struct.MyFunnyClass**
%this.addr, align 8
>>>>>   call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata
%struct.MyFunnyClass** %this.addr, metadata !89, metadata !31), !dbg !91
>>>>> ... rest of function code
>>>>> }
>>>>>  
>>>>> !73 = distinct !DISubprogram(name:
"MyFunnyClass", linkageName: "_ZN12MyFunnyClassC2Ev", scope:
!74, file: !1, line: 1, type: !81, isLocal: false, isDefinition: true,
scopeLine: 1, flags: DIFlagArtificial | DIFlagPrototyped, isOptimized: false,
unit: !87, declaration: !88, variables: !2)
>>>>>  
>>>> So the cloned function gets annotated with debug symbols as
expected. We noticed that the linkageName of the cloned function is the same as
the original one's. Could that cause the error mentioned above? If so, how
can we fix that error?
>>>>  
>>>> Best regards and thanks in advance,
>>>> Matthias
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>  
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>>

Seemingly Similar Threads

Search for more maybe matching threads

llvm dev - Jun 2017 - CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

[llvm-dev] CloneFunctionInto produces invalid debug info

Seemingly Similar Threads