Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-04 08:14 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At least, we've > been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some others > that will know the details.The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe it's just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it this time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some arches and experimental in others. CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update. cheers, --renato
Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-04 12:08 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
On 04 Feb 2017, at 09:14, Renato Golin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> > On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At least, we've >> been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some others >> that will know the details. > > The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe it's > just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it this > time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some arches > and experimental in others. > > CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update.Yes, please. :) I put up a review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29539 -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170204/e5c16185/attachment.sig>
Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-04 14:54 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 3:14 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At least, > we've > > been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some others > > that will know the details. > > The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe it's > just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it this > time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some arches > and experimental in others. > > CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update. >Great news! Thank you to the LLD team. I look forward to adding LLD as a dependency. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170204/cdb60bf4/attachment.html>
Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev
2017-Feb-17 18:27 UTC
[llvm-dev] when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
I see in that code review page that LLD is built in the test-release script. Happy to see that. Now I'm thinking about package maintainers such as Debian, and hoping that they will pick up LLD and make it available with this next release. What is different about this release that will clue Debian developers and other package managers that they should include LLD with this release? How can we communicate to package maintainers to do this? Regards, Andrew On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Dimitry Andric via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> On 04 Feb 2017, at 09:14, Renato Golin via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > On 4 February 2017 at 02:58, Sean Silva via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I think that LLD is going to be included in the 4.0 release. At least, > we've > >> been cherry-picking fixes into the release branch. I've CC'd some others > >> that will know the details. > > > > The test-release.sh script still doesn't have it and I believe it's > > just because we never had it, but I agree we should release it this > > time. It's good enough to at least be considered beta in some arches > > and experimental in others. > > > > CC'ing Hans and Tom to coordinate the script update. > > Yes, please. :) I put up a review here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29539 > > -Dimitry > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170217/e04064ae/attachment-0001.html>
Seemingly Similar Threads
- when will LLD be included with LLVM releases?
- [Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
- [Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
- [Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] [6.0.0 Release] Release Candidate 2 tagged
- llvm-6.0.0rc2: fatal error: clang/Basic/Version.h: No such file or directory