| Monday October 31 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:55PM |
1 |
BoF: Let’s move to GitHub! |
| 10:45PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 10:23PM |
0 |
[Zorg] Simplify ClangBuilder |
| 10:18PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting |
| 10:17PM |
2 |
[Zorg] Simplify ClangBuilder |
| 8:48PM |
0 |
RFC: PointerType should derive from Type rather than SequentialType |
| 8:43PM |
2 |
RFC: PointerType should derive from Type rather than SequentialType |
| 8:20PM |
0 |
[test-suite] Fix for CFLAGS="-ffp-contract=on" |
| 7:49PM |
2 |
LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting |
| 7:46PM |
0 |
[Zorg] Simplify ClangBuilder |
| 7:07PM |
2 |
[Zorg] Simplify ClangBuilder |
| 7:01PM |
0 |
LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting |
| 6:56PM |
0 |
[Zorg] Simplify ClangBuilder |
| 6:53PM |
2 |
LLVM Bay-area social durring LLVM Dev Meeting |
| 6:37PM |
0 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 6:30PM |
1 |
PIC and mcmodel=large on x86 doesn't use any relocations |
| 6:24PM |
0 |
RFC: PointerType should derive from Type rather than SequentialType |
| 6:23PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 5:53PM |
0 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 5:48PM |
2 |
PVS-Studio analysis of LLVM code |
| 4:39PM |
2 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 3:46PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #148, Oct 31st 2016 |
| 1:20PM |
2 |
BoF: Raising Next Generation of LLVM Developers |
| 12:14PM |
2 |
[Zorg] Simplify ClangBuilder |
| 8:53AM |
1 |
COMPILER-RT build break |
| 8:19AM |
0 |
[Support/RWMutex] [RFC] Use std::atomic to replace platform-specific implementation |
| 4:02AM |
0 |
[SCEV] inconsistent operand ordering |
| 12:49AM |
1 |
[PATCH] D26127: [MemorySSA] Repair AccessList invariants after insertion of new MemoryUseOrDef. |
| |
| Sunday October 30 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:50PM |
0 |
[PATCH] D26127: [MemorySSA] Repair AccessList invariants after insertion of new MemoryUseOrDef. |
| 9:33PM |
2 |
Adding assembly instructions to LLVM |
| 3:53PM |
2 |
BoF: Debug info for optimized code. |
| 8:40AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 3:41AM |
2 |
RFC: PointerType should derive from Type rather than SequentialType |
| 12:43AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| |
| Saturday October 29 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 12:29PM |
0 |
Basic block execution over time |
| 7:50AM |
1 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 1:00AM |
2 |
RFC [Bitcode]: Moving block info block state |
| 12:25AM |
1 |
Problems with Inline ASM expressions generated in the back end |
| |
| Friday October 28 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:22PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets |
| 10:51PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets |
| 10:27PM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets |
| 10:07PM |
1 |
(RFC) Encoding code duplication factor in discriminator |
| 10:02PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Using lld in ELLCC for different targets |
| 9:56PM |
2 |
Using lld in ELLCC for different targets |
| 9:30PM |
0 |
PIC and mcmodel=large on x86 doesn't use any relocations |
| 9:25PM |
1 |
Vector Shuffle chain lowering to X86 instructions simplification inconsistencies |
| 9:25PM |
0 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 9:21PM |
2 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 9:16PM |
0 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 8:25PM |
0 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 8:18PM |
1 |
RFC: Removing the DataStreamer and MemoryObject interfaces |
| 7:50PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 7:35PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 7:13PM |
4 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 7:06PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will restarted soon |
| 7:06PM |
2 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 6:52PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 6:44PM |
0 |
LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 6:43PM |
1 |
Bug with auto-vectorization of logf |
| 5:53PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 5:38PM |
6 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 5:14PM |
0 |
RFC: Removing the DataStreamer and MemoryObject interfaces |
| 5:12PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 5:08PM |
2 |
RFC: Removing the DataStreamer and MemoryObject interfaces |
| 4:54PM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 4:41PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 4:17PM |
9 |
LLD to be the default linker in Clang |
| 3:22PM |
3 |
3.9.1 Release Schedule |
| 3:19PM |
2 |
Basic block execution over time |
| 2:55PM |
0 |
RFC: a more detailed design for ThinLTO + vcall CFI |
| 1:39PM |
1 |
128bit binary instruction format? |
| 1:33PM |
1 |
How to split module into several ones |
| 1:11PM |
0 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 11:10AM |
4 |
MCJit and remove module memory leak? |
| 10:04AM |
2 |
mischeduler |
| 9:25AM |
1 |
Error while generating codeemmiter.inc |
| 9:17AM |
0 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 9:10AM |
3 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 8:59AM |
0 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 8:46AM |
2 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 8:21AM |
0 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 3:41AM |
1 |
Compiler used to build LLVM |
| 1:45AM |
0 |
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles |
| 1:43AM |
4 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 1:38AM |
0 |
Compiler used to build LLVM |
| 1:21AM |
0 |
Compiler used to build LLVM |
| 12:45AM |
0 |
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles |
| 12:39AM |
4 |
Compiler used to build LLVM |
| 12:34AM |
2 |
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles |
| 12:30AM |
2 |
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles |
| 12:23AM |
0 |
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles |
| 12:05AM |
0 |
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles |
| |
| Thursday October 27 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:06PM |
0 |
BoF: Enhancing LLVM's Floating-Point Exception and Rounding Mode Support |
| 9:53PM |
1 |
(RFC) Encoding code duplication factor in discriminator |
| 9:33PM |
4 |
Understanding and Cleaning Up Machine Instruction Bundles |
| 9:12PM |
1 |
PIC and mcmodel=large on x86 doesn't use any relocations |
| 8:59PM |
1 |
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg) |
| 8:57PM |
0 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 8:18PM |
0 |
(RFC) Encoding code duplication factor in discriminator |
| 8:18PM |
1 |
problem on compiling cuda program with clang++ |
| 8:11PM |
2 |
(RFC) Encoding code duplication factor in discriminator |
| 8:07PM |
0 |
problem on compiling cuda program with clang++ |
| 8:04PM |
3 |
problem on compiling cuda program with clang++ |
| 7:56PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted at 3 PM Pacific time today |
| 7:43PM |
0 |
problem on compiling cuda program with clang++ |
| 6:55PM |
0 |
(RFC) Encoding code duplication factor in discriminator |
| 6:47PM |
0 |
Bug with auto-vectorization of logf |
| 6:44PM |
0 |
(RFC) Encoding code duplication factor in discriminator |
| 6:42PM |
1 |
PIC and mcmodel=large on x86 doesn't use any relocations |
| 6:39PM |
8 |
(RFC) Encoding code duplication factor in discriminator |
| 6:36PM |
2 |
Bug with auto-vectorization of logf |
| 6:02PM |
0 |
problem on compiling cuda program with clang++ |
| 3:30PM |
1 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 3:18PM |
0 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 3:18PM |
2 |
How to split module into several ones |
| 10:05AM |
4 |
What was the IR made for precisely? |
| 6:28AM |
0 |
[Help] How to keep ($clang_dir)/include/clang/AST/Attrs.inc file after compilation? |
| 5:45AM |
1 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 5:39AM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 5:10AM |
2 |
2016 LLVM Dev Mtg: Moderators needed! |
| 4:59AM |
3 |
problem on compiling cuda program with clang++ |
| 4:48AM |
2 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| |
| Wednesday October 26 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:14PM |
0 |
[GreenDragon] Notifications are back on! |
| 8:53PM |
0 |
How does one reduce a function CFG to its entry block? |
| 7:58PM |
0 |
Asan code size overhead |
| 7:04PM |
2 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 5:10PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 4:21PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 4:14PM |
3 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 3:12PM |
0 |
archiving LTO objects broken for current Xcode releases |
| 3:06PM |
2 |
archiving LTO objects broken for current Xcode releases |
| 2:54PM |
3 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 2:42PM |
2 |
Asan code size overhead |
| 11:16AM |
2 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 10:08AM |
1 |
Segfault in llc 3.8.0 building GHC |
| 8:34AM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 5:48AM |
7 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 4:47AM |
0 |
Question about debug symbol |
| 3:36AM |
0 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 1:52AM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 1:28AM |
2 |
RFC: APIs for bitcode files containing multiple modules |
| 12:27AM |
2 |
RFC: a more detailed design for ThinLTO + vcall CFI |
| |
| Tuesday October 25 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:22PM |
0 |
[Help] Add custom pragma |
| 11:12PM |
2 |
[Help] Add custom pragma |
| 11:00PM |
0 |
[Help] Add custom pragma |
| 10:12PM |
1 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 10:07PM |
0 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 9:55PM |
4 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 9:54PM |
2 |
[Help] Add custom pragma |
| 9:48PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 9:07PM |
3 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 8:48PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 8:23PM |
0 |
LLVM ERROR: Cannot select adde |
| 6:41PM |
1 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 6:29PM |
3 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 6:16PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 5:44PM |
3 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 5:19PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 4:48PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 4:46PM |
3 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 4:09PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 2:28PM |
0 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 12:49PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 12:43PM |
2 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 12:34PM |
0 |
RuntimeDyLdCOFF and RTTI on Windows |
| 7:19AM |
0 |
llvm interpreter does not find function defined by addGlobalMapping |
| 5:46AM |
4 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 3:54AM |
2 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 2:29AM |
0 |
Instruction selection confusion at register - chooses vector register instead of scalar one |
| 1:12AM |
1 |
LLVM in HPC Workshop @ SC16 - Agenda |
| |
| Monday October 24 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:49PM |
2 |
RuntimeDyLdCOFF and RTTI on Windows |
| 11:31PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 11:30PM |
2 |
Instruction selection confusion at register - chooses vector register instead of scalar one |
| 11:17PM |
2 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 11:15PM |
0 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 11:11PM |
2 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 8:54PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 8:36PM |
3 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 8:31PM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:26PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:07PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 7:54PM |
0 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 7:38PM |
2 |
RFC: (Co-)Convergent functions and uniform function parameters |
| 5:04PM |
0 |
Buildbot blame emails broken? |
| 4:33PM |
1 |
Buildbot blame emails broken? |
| 4:14PM |
0 |
Buildbot blame emails broken? |
| 3:32PM |
1 |
[ASAN] Getting ASAN working on a non pthread baremetal OS |
| 2:36PM |
7 |
Buildbot blame emails broken? |
| 11:11AM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #147, Oct 24th 2016 |
| 10:50AM |
0 |
TableGen [sub]class name as a string |
| 10:11AM |
2 |
Accessing the associated LLVM IR Instruction for an SDNode used in instruction selection (back end) |
| 7:09AM |
0 |
llvm interpreter does not find function defined by addGlobalMapping |
| 7:04AM |
0 |
ERROR:Registers are not part of Target |
| |
| Sunday October 23 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:30PM |
0 |
LLVM Social Berlin, 27th of October |
| 5:13PM |
0 |
Error while building llvm - need suggestion |
| 4:30PM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 3:47PM |
1 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| |
| Saturday October 22 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:57PM |
1 |
[RFC] Removing PowerPC/Darwin Support? |
| 5:31PM |
0 |
[RFC] Removing PowerPC/Darwin Support? |
| 2:18PM |
0 |
RuntimeDyLdCOFF and RTTI on Windows |
| 1:21PM |
2 |
Error while building llvm - need suggestion |
| 1:21AM |
3 |
Is it possible to execute Objective-C code via LLVM JIT? |
| 12:06AM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted tonight |
| |
| Friday October 21 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:18PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 10:22PM |
0 |
LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 10:01PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:49PM |
0 |
New Hackers Lab - Volunteers and Code Owners Needed |
| 9:29PM |
0 |
Accessing the associated LLVM IR Instruction for an SDNode used in instruction selection (back end) |
| 8:53PM |
4 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:38PM |
0 |
A use of RDF to extend register Remat |
| 6:57PM |
1 |
Segfault in llc 3.8.0 building GHC |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
Segfault in llc 3.8.0 building GHC |
| 6:37PM |
0 |
Parallel IR [PIR] --- Discussion sheet |
| 5:48PM |
0 |
RFC: Implement variable-sized register classes |
| 5:03PM |
0 |
[RFC] Removing PowerPC/Darwin Support? |
| 5:00PM |
1 |
InstNamer numbering question |
| 4:52PM |
3 |
[RFC] Removing PowerPC/Darwin Support? |
| 3:37PM |
0 |
[RFC] Removing PowerPC/Darwin Support? |
| 2:51PM |
2 |
LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 2:45PM |
0 |
LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 2:32PM |
3 |
Prioritizing an SDNode for scheduling |
| 2:29PM |
0 |
Prioritizing an SDNode for scheduling |
| 2:27PM |
1 |
llvm build failed on Fedora 24 |
| 1:19PM |
3 |
Segfault in llc 3.8.0 building GHC |
| 11:57AM |
2 |
Accessing the associated LLVM IR Instruction for an SDNode used in instruction selection (back end) |
| 9:13AM |
0 |
llvm build failed on Fedora 24 |
| 8:43AM |
4 |
llvm build failed on Fedora 24 |
| 6:33AM |
1 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 12:08AM |
2 |
Prioritizing an SDNode for scheduling |
| 12:05AM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 10/9/2016 - 10/15/2016 |
| 12:05AM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 10/2/2016 - 10/8/2016 |
| |
| Thursday October 20 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:57PM |
5 |
[RFC] Removing PowerPC/Darwin Support? |
| 9:46PM |
0 |
Publication: A paper related to LLVM |
| 9:20PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:10PM |
2 |
Publication: A paper related to LLVM |
| 9:05PM |
6 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:03PM |
0 |
[Job Ad] LLVM Postdoc Position at the University of Rochester |
| 8:58PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:56PM |
0 |
Publication: A paper related to LLVM |
| 8:39PM |
0 |
how to make "test-suite" pass even if the current compiler configuration has FP contraction enabled |
| 8:37PM |
2 |
Publication: A paper related to LLVM |
| 8:36PM |
3 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 6:57PM |
0 |
Is it possible to execute Objective-C code via LLVM JIT? |
| 5:14PM |
0 |
[AVX512BW] Nasty KAND issue |
| 5:05PM |
2 |
[AVX512BW] Nasty KAND issue |
| 4:37PM |
0 |
Job opportunity at Xilinx in San Jose |
| 4:28PM |
0 |
[AVX512BW] Nasty KAND issue |
| 4:26PM |
2 |
[AVX512BW] Nasty KAND issue |
| 4:23PM |
0 |
Leveraging newer CMake features for Language standards |
| 4:05PM |
0 |
[AVX512BW] Nasty KAND issue |
| 3:54PM |
2 |
[AVX512BW] Nasty KAND issue |
| 3:49PM |
2 |
Leveraging newer CMake features for Language standards |
| 3:20PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 3:18PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 3:15PM |
2 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 3:12PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 3:05PM |
2 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 5:17AM |
2 |
Building tablegen alone |
| 4:32AM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 3:40AM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 3:29AM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 1:55AM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 1:27AM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| |
| Wednesday October 19 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:46PM |
3 |
LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 10:36PM |
1 |
[Sparc] vararg double issue on 32 bit Sparc processors |
| 10:18PM |
0 |
[Sparc] vararg double issue on 32 bit Sparc processors |
| 9:27PM |
4 |
[Sparc] vararg double issue on 32 bit Sparc processors |
| 8:04PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 7:38PM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 7:38PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 7:33PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 7:21PM |
1 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 7:19PM |
0 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 7:17PM |
0 |
LCSSA verification for the top-level loops |
| 7:16PM |
2 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 7:06PM |
0 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 6:31PM |
0 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 6:28PM |
3 |
Is it possible to execute Objective-C code via LLVM JIT? |
| 6:19PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 6:14PM |
4 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 5:57PM |
2 |
LCSSA verification for the top-level loops |
| 5:46PM |
2 |
[RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass |
| 5:19PM |
0 |
Assertion fail/crash in X86FrameLowering::GetFrameIndexReference SEH |
| 5:00PM |
2 |
Assertion fail/crash in X86FrameLowering::GetFrameIndexReference SEH |
| 4:52PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 4:02PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 4:01PM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 3:51PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 3:24PM |
0 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 2:49PM |
1 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 2:43PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 2:06PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 1:59PM |
0 |
Buildbots Timeout |
| 1:55PM |
1 |
MachineInstr to byte or MCInst pass? |
| 1:38PM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 1:28PM |
0 |
Print AMDGPU structures in llvm-objdump |
| 1:12PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 1:08PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 12:44PM |
4 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 11:52AM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 10:52AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 10:39AM |
0 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 10:34AM |
0 |
LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 10:30AM |
3 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:43AM |
3 |
IntrusiveRefCntPtr vs std::shared_ptr |
| 9:37AM |
2 |
LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 8:03AM |
0 |
LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 4:43AM |
1 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 4:35AM |
0 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 4:27AM |
2 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 4:25AM |
1 |
llvm/clang binaries are served over plain http |
| 3:57AM |
1 |
Third-party libraries policy |
| 3:47AM |
0 |
Third-party libraries policy |
| 3:41AM |
2 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 3:41AM |
2 |
Third-party libraries policy |
| 3:38AM |
0 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 3:30AM |
2 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 3:30AM |
0 |
Third-party libraries policy |
| 3:22AM |
0 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 1:44AM |
7 |
Embedding LLD version to executables |
| 1:28AM |
2 |
Third-party libraries policy |
| 1:08AM |
0 |
LCSSA verification for the top-level loops |
| |
| Tuesday October 18 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:49PM |
0 |
Is it possible to execute Objective-C code via LLVM JIT? |
| 10:46PM |
1 |
Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:42PM |
0 |
Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:30PM |
2 |
Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:29PM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 9:27PM |
3 |
RFC: LLD: creating linker-generated sections as input sections instead of output sections |
| 9:22PM |
2 |
Is it possible to execute Objective-C code via LLVM JIT? |
| 9:10PM |
0 |
Is it possible to execute Objective-C code via LLVM JIT? |
| 9:09PM |
1 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:49PM |
0 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 8:39PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:34PM |
0 |
[GreenDragon] System Downtime |
| 8:33PM |
2 |
Is it possible to execute Objective-C code via LLVM JIT? |
| 8:25PM |
2 |
[SCEV] inconsistent operand ordering |
| 8:22PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:12PM |
7 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 8:07PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 7:46PM |
2 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 7:44PM |
0 |
Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 7:35PM |
2 |
Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 7:25PM |
5 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 7:25PM |
0 |
Cambridge LLVM Social, Oct 26th |
| 7:00PM |
0 |
[SCEV] inconsistent operand ordering |
| 6:36PM |
2 |
[SCEV] inconsistent operand ordering |
| 6:34PM |
0 |
How to change the binary directory? |
| 6:21PM |
0 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 6:18PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 6:04PM |
0 |
[SCEV] inconsistent operand ordering |
| 6:01PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 5:31PM |
1 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 5:25PM |
3 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 5:08PM |
0 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 4:56PM |
3 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 4:27PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 4:23PM |
2 |
A use of RDF to extend register Remat |
| 4:22PM |
0 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 3:10PM |
2 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 2:59PM |
2 |
GnuWin32 alternatives for tests of MSVC build? |
| 2:56PM |
3 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 2:51PM |
0 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 2:31PM |
2 |
[help] How to speed up compilation? |
| 1:29PM |
0 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 12:06PM |
8 |
RFC: Killing undef and spreading poison |
| 11:43AM |
0 |
LLVM social Bristol - 7pm, Thursday 27th October @ Shore Cafe Bar |
| 9:54AM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 9:17AM |
3 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 7:13AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 6:51AM |
0 |
Assertion fail/crash in X86FrameLowering::GetFrameIndexReference SEH |
| 3:24AM |
0 |
LLVM backend -- Avoid base+index address mode for X86 |
| 2:17AM |
2 |
LLVM Performance Workshop at CGO 2017 |
| |
| Monday October 17 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:18PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 10:19PM |
2 |
[SCEV] inconsistent operand ordering |
| 9:57PM |
0 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 9:47PM |
2 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 9:45PM |
0 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 9:12PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 9:01PM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:41PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:20PM |
0 |
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg) |
| 6:53PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 6:44PM |
3 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 6:09PM |
4 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 5:45PM |
1 |
LLVM backend -- Avoid base+index address mode for X86 |
| 5:39PM |
2 |
LCSSA verification for the top-level loops |
| 4:02PM |
2 |
Assertion fail/crash in X86FrameLowering::GetFrameIndexReference SEH |
| 3:17PM |
1 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 3:14PM |
0 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 3:13PM |
0 |
LLVM backend -- Avoid base+index address mode for X86 |
| 3:10PM |
2 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 3:06PM |
2 |
LLVM backend -- Avoid base+index address mode for X86 |
| 2:24PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 2:20PM |
0 |
LLVM backend -- Avoid base+index address mode for X86 |
| 1:56PM |
0 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 1:55PM |
3 |
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg) |
| 12:13PM |
1 |
Is GCC 4.7 still supported? |
| 12:13PM |
1 |
MCRegisterClass::getSize() - spill size vs reg size |
| 11:59AM |
0 |
GitHub Survey Online |
| 11:39AM |
0 |
Is GCC 4.7 still supported? |
| 11:04AM |
3 |
Is GCC 4.7 still supported? |
| 11:02AM |
4 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 10:54AM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #146, Oct 17th 2016 |
| 10:46AM |
0 |
Is GCC 4.7 still supported? |
| 10:19AM |
2 |
Is GCC 4.7 still supported? |
| 7:29AM |
2 |
Error while compiling registerInfo.cpp |
| 2:51AM |
4 |
LLVM backend -- Avoid base+index address mode for X86 |
| |
| Sunday October 16 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:28PM |
0 |
MPI Support in LLVM |
| 8:31PM |
2 |
MPI Support in LLVM |
| 5:49PM |
1 |
Induction variable identification? |
| 4:48PM |
0 |
Induction variable identification? |
| 2:54PM |
0 |
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg) |
| 10:38AM |
3 |
Induction variable identification? |
| |
| Saturday October 15 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:22PM |
1 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:18PM |
0 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:17PM |
0 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:16PM |
0 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:12PM |
1 |
LLVM/CLANG: CUDA compilation fail for inline assembly code |
| 11:12PM |
2 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:12PM |
2 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:10PM |
0 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:07PM |
5 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:01PM |
0 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 10:56PM |
3 |
How to remove memcpy |
| 11:37AM |
1 |
LLVM Virtual Machine |
| 9:22AM |
1 |
Parallel IR [PIR] --- BoF preparation discussion |
| 9:08AM |
1 |
Berlin: LLVM Hackday #1, Betahaus, Oct. 22nd |
| 6:54AM |
0 |
LLVM Virtual Machine |
| 1:36AM |
0 |
Can LLVM emit machine code faster with no optimization passes? |
| |
| Friday October 14 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:38PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted tonight |
| 10:38PM |
0 |
LCSSA verification for the top-level loops |
| 10:10PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 10:05PM |
1 |
Adding [[nodiscard]] to Compiler.h |
| 10:05PM |
3 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 8:02PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 7:55PM |
0 |
RFC: Reducing the number of set classes in ADT |
| 7:41PM |
0 |
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg) |
| 6:58PM |
2 |
RFC: Reducing the number of set classes in ADT |
| 6:51PM |
0 |
creating an .init section |
| 6:32PM |
5 |
BoF: Shipping Software as LLVM IR (@Upcoming Dev Mtg) |
| 6:10PM |
2 |
creating an .init section |
| 5:42PM |
1 |
[GreenDragon] Intermittent Node Failures - Update |
| 4:57PM |
1 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 4:54PM |
2 |
LCSSA verification for the top-level loops |
| 4:39PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 4:28PM |
2 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 4:05PM |
1 |
Getting a combined llvm-cov report for a set of tests |
| 3:50PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 3:45PM |
0 |
FW: [Dwarf-Discuss] DWARF Version 5 Public Review Draft Released |
| 3:36PM |
2 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:50PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:48PM |
0 |
Berlin: LLVM Hackday #1, Betahaus, Oct. 22nd |
| 2:38PM |
0 |
[arm, aarch64] Alignment checking in interleaved access pass |
| 2:20PM |
0 |
LLVM/CLANG: CUDA compilation fail for inline assembly code |
| 1:59PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 12:53PM |
2 |
LLVM/CLANG: CUDA compilation fail for inline assembly code |
| 12:52PM |
2 |
Berlin: LLVM Hackday #1, Betahaus, Oct. 22nd |
| 10:20AM |
0 |
Parallel IR [PIR] --- BoF preparation discussion |
| 10:06AM |
0 |
Indirect Call Promotion and llvm.expect |
| 9:38AM |
3 |
Parallel IR [PIR] --- BoF preparation discussion |
| 9:08AM |
0 |
Berlin: LLVM Hackday #1, Betahaus, Oct. 22nd |
| 7:35AM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 7:30AM |
2 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 12:16AM |
1 |
GitHub Survey? |
| |
| Thursday October 13 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:56PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 11:54PM |
2 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 11:52PM |
1 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 10:28PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 10:16PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 10:03PM |
2 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 9:54PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 9:54PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 9:51PM |
2 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 9:50PM |
1 |
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop |
| 9:25PM |
2 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 9:15PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 8:51PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 8:40PM |
2 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 8:23PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 8:13PM |
1 |
LLVM/CUDA generate LLVM IR |
| 7:59PM |
0 |
Possible bug in TypePrinter::printElaboratedBefore? |
| 7:45PM |
2 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 6:56PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 6:56PM |
1 |
Target DAG-combine vs. Target custom lowering |
| 6:36PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 6:23PM |
1 |
Filing bug report |
| 6:10PM |
0 |
Status of docs/BitCodeFormat.rst? |
| 6:09PM |
3 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 6:09PM |
2 |
Status of docs/BitCodeFormat.rst? |
| 6:03PM |
0 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 6:02PM |
0 |
Status of docs/BitCodeFormat.rst? |
| 5:57PM |
0 |
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop |
| 5:50PM |
0 |
Status of docs/BitCodeFormat.rst? |
| 5:46PM |
0 |
Filing bug report |
| 5:30PM |
0 |
Filing bug report |
| 5:24PM |
4 |
Status of docs/BitCodeFormat.rst? |
| 4:35PM |
1 |
Clang error to emit llvm code |
| 4:30PM |
2 |
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop |
| 4:24PM |
0 |
Clang error to emit llvm code |
| 3:42PM |
0 |
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop |
| 3:13PM |
2 |
Clang error to emit llvm code |
| 11:56AM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 9:05AM |
0 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 8:49AM |
4 |
Filing bug report |
| 8:19AM |
1 |
Target MachineFunctionInfo and MIR passes |
| 4:42AM |
3 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 4:32AM |
1 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 4:16AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 4:14AM |
0 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 3:39AM |
1 |
Dragon egg not recognizing Target ARM machine |
| 3:33AM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 3:28AM |
2 |
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop |
| 3:19AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 3:07AM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 2:35AM |
0 |
Dragon egg not recognizing Target ARM machine |
| 2:07AM |
11 |
GitHub Survey? |
| 1:22AM |
0 |
LTO prevention help |
| 12:48AM |
2 |
LTO prevention help |
| 12:25AM |
0 |
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop |
| 12:00AM |
1 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| |
| Wednesday October 12 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:59PM |
3 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 11:35PM |
2 |
Loop Unrolling Fail in Simple Vectorized loop |
| 11:31PM |
0 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 11:28PM |
0 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 11:05PM |
0 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 11:03PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 10:52PM |
1 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 10:51PM |
7 |
[RFC] Increase minimum supported GCC version for building LLVM to 4.8 |
| 10:45PM |
2 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 10:40PM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 10:35PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 10:33PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 10:19PM |
4 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 10:15PM |
0 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 10:09PM |
2 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 9:22PM |
0 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 9:16PM |
3 |
Dragon egg not recognizing Target ARM machine |
| 8:54PM |
0 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 8:07PM |
1 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 8:01PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 7:58PM |
3 |
Can LLVM emit machine code faster with no optimization passes? |
| 7:40PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 7:35PM |
5 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 7:23PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 7:08PM |
3 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 6:59PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 6:51PM |
0 |
[Intern Ad] Samsung Austin R&D Center |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 6:38PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 6:38PM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 6:33PM |
0 |
Matthias` suggestion for "test-suite" tests that are broken at "-Ofast" and are difficult to "repair" |
| 6:32PM |
0 |
Can LLVM emit machine code faster with no optimization passes? |
| 6:29PM |
1 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 6:24PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 6:23PM |
1 |
LLVM z80 backend and llvm-dis missing? |
| 6:15PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 6:02PM |
0 |
Selection DAG adding node question |
| 5:40PM |
0 |
Fwd: Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 5:37PM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 5:28PM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 5:22PM |
2 |
Matthias` suggestion for "test-suite" tests that are broken at "-Ofast" and are difficult to "repair" |
| 5:13PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 4:31PM |
2 |
Selection DAG adding node question |
| 4:15PM |
0 |
How to get interprocedural analysis results from DSA (Poolalloc) |
| 4:09PM |
0 |
Matthias` suggestion for "test-suite" tests that are broken at "-Ofast" and are difficult to "repair" |
| 4:07PM |
0 |
[Intern Ad] Samsung Austin R&D Center |
| 4:00PM |
2 |
Matthias` suggestion for "test-suite" tests that are broken at "-Ofast" and are difficult to "repair" |
| 3:29PM |
4 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 3:15PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 3:15PM |
4 |
Can LLVM emit machine code faster with no optimization passes? |
| 3:13PM |
0 |
Warning on custom attribute |
| 2:53PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:43PM |
3 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:43PM |
1 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:37PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:28PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:19PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:16PM |
3 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:12PM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 2:05PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 2:03PM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 1:43PM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 1:35PM |
8 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 1:34PM |
3 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 1:26PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 1:26PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 1:11PM |
1 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 1:00PM |
1 |
Landing Pad bug? |
| 12:49PM |
2 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 12:42PM |
1 |
Port to other Operating Systems |
| 12:04PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 9:33AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 9:30AM |
1 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 9:14AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 9:01AM |
2 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 8:53AM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 8:38AM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 8:34AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 8:28AM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:23AM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 7:38AM |
0 |
Introducing opencl builtins as Intrinsics |
| 6:29AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 6:15AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 4:47AM |
1 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 4:35AM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 4:30AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 4:26AM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 4:20AM |
4 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 4:18AM |
2 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 3:59AM |
0 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 3:39AM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 3:20AM |
3 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 3:13AM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 1:22AM |
15 |
RFC: General purpose type-safe formatting library |
| 12:17AM |
0 |
Port to other Operating Systems |
| |
| Tuesday October 11 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:24PM |
2 |
Port to other Operating Systems |
| 10:15PM |
2 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 9:48PM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 9:41PM |
1 |
Port to other Operating Systems |
| 8:52PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:46PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:42PM |
0 |
Port to other Operating Systems |
| 8:07PM |
2 |
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project |
| 5:28PM |
7 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 5:00PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 4:35PM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 4:02PM |
0 |
Landing Pad bug? |
| 3:23PM |
4 |
Port to other Operating Systems |
| 1:25PM |
1 |
[CFP] LLVM devroom @ FOSDEM 2017 |
| 11:33AM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 11:15AM |
3 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 9:42AM |
0 |
iOS Parsing Error |
| 8:33AM |
0 |
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project |
| 8:14AM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:11AM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 7:59AM |
2 |
iOS Parsing Error |
| 7:04AM |
2 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 6:30AM |
2 |
Landing Pad bug? |
| 3:31AM |
0 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| 3:12AM |
5 |
RFC: Absolute or "fixed address" symbols as immediate operands |
| |
| Monday October 10 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:04PM |
0 |
[GreenDragon] Intermittent Node Failures |
| 10:02PM |
0 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 9:53PM |
0 |
On Loop Distribution pass |
| 9:52PM |
2 |
On Loop Distribution pass |
| 9:50PM |
0 |
On Loop Distribution pass |
| 9:16PM |
2 |
[arm, aarch64] Alignment checking in interleaved access pass |
| 8:14PM |
0 |
[arm, aarch64] Alignment checking in interleaved access pass |
| 6:54PM |
1 |
Special vselect code generation case using TableGen |
| 6:39PM |
2 |
[arm, aarch64] Alignment checking in interleaved access pass |
| 6:02PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be updated and restarted tonight |
| 5:17PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 4:17PM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 3:57PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #145, Oct 10th 2016 |
| 3:22PM |
0 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 3:20PM |
1 |
Addressing TableGen's error "Ran out of lanemask bits" in order to use more than 32 subregisters per register |
| 3:01PM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 2:23PM |
8 |
Generate Register Indirect mode instruction |
| 2:10PM |
2 |
[test-suite] making polybench/symm succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 1:58PM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 1:42PM |
2 |
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project |
| 10:26AM |
1 |
Statepoint GC : relocations on exceptional path |
| 9:50AM |
0 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:33AM |
0 |
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project |
| 2:58AM |
0 |
ELLCC 0.1.33 is now available. |
| 2:29AM |
0 |
Using std::chrono |
| 12:29AM |
1 |
please add to llvm.org/pubs |
| 12:10AM |
2 |
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project |
| |
| Sunday October 9 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:41PM |
0 |
[RFC] RISC-V backend |
| 9:03PM |
0 |
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project |
| 5:09PM |
3 |
On Loop Distribution pass |
| 2:18PM |
3 |
Embedding llvm as a git submodule in Project |
| 5:39AM |
0 |
Addressing TableGen's error "Ran out of lanemask bits" in order to use more than 32 subregisters per register |
| 3:03AM |
1 |
Changes to the Developer Policy / IR Backwards Compatibility |
| 2:53AM |
0 |
Changes to the Developer Policy / IR Backwards Compatibility |
| |
| Saturday October 8 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:19PM |
1 |
LLVM Social in Salt Lake City, UT (Nov. 14th)? |
| 7:52PM |
3 |
RFC: Implement variable-sized register classes |
| 7:07PM |
3 |
Changes to the Developer Policy / IR Backwards Compatibility |
| 6:22PM |
1 |
cmake 3.7.0-rc1 breaks stage2 bootstrap in openmp on 10.11 with Xcode 8 |
| 6:08PM |
0 |
cmake 3.7.0-rc1 breaks stage2 bootstrap in openmp on 10.11 with Xcode 8 |
| 5:41PM |
0 |
Changes to the Developer Policy / IR Backwards Compatibility |
| 5:33PM |
2 |
cmake 3.7.0-rc1 breaks stage2 bootstrap in openmp on 10.11 with Xcode 8 |
| 1:26PM |
0 |
[arm, aarch64] Alignment checking in interleaved access pass |
| 1:25PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 11:17AM |
0 |
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 11:02AM |
2 |
unable to compile llvm with gcc 4.7.4 |
| 8:31AM |
0 |
LLVM Social in Salt Lake City, UT (Nov. 14th)? |
| 6:57AM |
2 |
Changes to the Developer Policy / IR Backwards Compatibility |
| 3:42AM |
0 |
New test-suite result viewer/analyzer |
| 2:19AM |
3 |
LLVM Social in Salt Lake City, UT (Nov. 14th)? |
| 2:02AM |
0 |
Update on the status of the AVR backend |
| 1:53AM |
0 |
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 1:46AM |
2 |
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 1:28AM |
3 |
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 12:56AM |
0 |
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| 12:34AM |
3 |
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on" |
| |
| Friday October 7 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:28PM |
1 |
Debug info interacting with optimization and code generation |
| 10:25PM |
0 |
Debug info interacting with optimization and code generation |
| 10:24PM |
0 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 10:11PM |
2 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 9:48PM |
0 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 9:33PM |
0 |
Debug info interacting with optimization and code generation |
| 9:28PM |
2 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 9:20PM |
1 |
Debug info interacting with optimization and code generation |
| 8:55PM |
0 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 8:35PM |
0 |
Debug info interacting with optimization and code generation |
| 8:27PM |
7 |
Debug info interacting with optimization and code generation |
| 8:22PM |
2 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 7:20PM |
0 |
Proposal: arbitrary relocations in constant global initializers |
| 7:14PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 7:13PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Revisiting our informal policy to support two versions of MSVC |
| 5:47PM |
0 |
Is extern_weak a legal linkage for function definitions? |
| 3:37PM |
2 |
Is extern_weak a legal linkage for function definitions? |
| 9:13AM |
0 |
Dominator construction? |
| 6:52AM |
2 |
Using std::chrono |
| 6:37AM |
0 |
Using std::chrono |
| 1:10AM |
3 |
Using std::chrono |
| 12:29AM |
3 |
RuntimeDyLdCOFF and RTTI on Windows |
| |
| Thursday October 6 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:31PM |
0 |
Adding asan poison to Recycler and ArrayRecycler |
| 9:20PM |
1 |
How is target_triple/default_triple handled in tests? |
| 8:48PM |
0 |
How is target_triple/default_triple handled in tests? |
| 8:40PM |
2 |
How is target_triple/default_triple handled in tests? |
| 6:40PM |
0 |
LoopVectorizer -- generating bad and unhandled shufflevector sequence |
| 6:17PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] test-suite: a new proposal for how to move forward to make "test-suite" more automatic, more flexible, and more maintainable, especially WRT reference outputs |
| 4:09PM |
0 |
Problem with BranchFolder::OptimizeImpDefsBlock |
| 3:38PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] test-suite: a new proposal for how to move forward to make "test-suite" more automatic, more flexible, and more maintainable, especially WRT reference outputs |
| 3:11PM |
3 |
test-suite: a new proposal for how to move forward to make "test-suite" more automatic, more flexible, and more maintainable, especially WRT reference outputs |
| 3:06PM |
1 |
Adding utility/debugging passes upstream |
| 2:30PM |
2 |
LoopVectorizer -- generating bad and unhandled shufflevector sequence |
| 11:54AM |
4 |
Adding asan poison to Recycler and ArrayRecycler |
| 9:02AM |
0 |
test-suite: a new proposal for how to move forward to make "test-suite" more automatic, more flexible, and more maintainable, especially WRT reference outputs |
| 9:01AM |
1 |
ThinLTO: passing TargetOptions to LLVMgold.so |
| |
| Wednesday October 5 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:45PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 9/25/2016 - 10/1/2016 |
| 11:40PM |
1 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 9/25/2016 - 10/1/2016 |
| 10:29PM |
2 |
test-suite: a new proposal for how to move forward to make "test-suite" more automatic, more flexible, and more maintainable, especially WRT reference outputs |
| 8:48PM |
1 |
Using '__attribute__((section("name")))' for inline assembly injection |
| 8:39PM |
0 |
Using '__attribute__((section("name")))' for inline assembly injection |
| 5:44PM |
3 |
Using '__attribute__((section("name")))' for inline assembly injection |
| 5:06PM |
0 |
Using '__attribute__((section("name")))' for inline assembly injection |
| 3:44PM |
0 |
ThinLTO: passing TargetOptions to LLVMgold.so |
| 2:02PM |
1 |
Not increasing SDNodeOrder for llvm.dbg.value to avoid different scheduling? |
| 11:48AM |
0 |
Load combine pass |
| 10:20AM |
3 |
ThinLTO: passing TargetOptions to LLVMgold.so |
| 8:56AM |
3 |
Using '__attribute__((section("name")))' for inline assembly injection |
| 7:32AM |
0 |
LLVM z80 backend and llvm-dis missing? |
| 5:07AM |
2 |
Memory-to-memory .td example? |
| 12:50AM |
0 |
AST of whole program |
| 12:40AM |
1 |
Building Dragonegg for use with LLVM 3.6.2 |
| |
| Tuesday October 4 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:31PM |
0 |
New Phab dead slow on mobile |
| 10:24PM |
2 |
LLVM z80 backend and llvm-dis missing? |
| 9:18PM |
0 |
[llvm-bugs] Building Dragonegg for use with LLVM 3.6.2 |
| 9:15PM |
8 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 9:10PM |
2 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 8:41PM |
0 |
Software tools development opportunity at Qualcomm in Austin |
| 8:41PM |
1 |
Incompatible type assertion from llvm-tblgen |
| 8:04PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:55PM |
2 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:07PM |
0 |
Incompatible type assertion from llvm-tblgen |
| 6:58PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
RFC: Implement variable-sized register classes |
| 6:46PM |
0 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets |
| 6:26PM |
2 |
Getting the symbolic expression for an address calculation |
| 6:24PM |
0 |
Getting the symbolic expression for an address calculation |
| 6:14PM |
3 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets |
| 6:13PM |
2 |
Getting the symbolic expression for an address calculation |
| 6:11PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 5:20PM |
1 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 5:15PM |
2 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 5:15PM |
1 |
[RFC] Require PRs for XFAILing tests |
| 5:08PM |
3 |
Software tools development opportunity at Qualcomm in Austin |
| 4:20PM |
0 |
[RFC] Interprocedural MIR-level outlining pass |
| 4:01PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 3:42PM |
1 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 3:40PM |
2 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 3:36PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 3:33PM |
2 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 3:29PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 3:22PM |
2 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 3:10PM |
1 |
When is a store not (memory) safe? |
| 2:09PM |
1 |
ld.bfd and LLVMgold.so |
| 1:58PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 11:00AM |
1 |
Semantics of MachineInstr::findRegisterUseOperandIdx |
| 8:04AM |
5 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:54AM |
0 |
When is a store not (memory) safe? |
| 6:52AM |
1 |
DebugInfo: purpose of align field |
| 1:39AM |
0 |
DebugInfo: purpose of align field |
| 1:15AM |
2 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 1:02AM |
2 |
New Phab dead slow on mobile |
| 12:31AM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 12:24AM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 12:22AM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 12:16AM |
2 |
Incompatible type assertion from llvm-tblgen |
| 12:04AM |
4 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| |
| Monday October 3 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:40PM |
2 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 11:08PM |
0 |
October LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday! |
| 11:06PM |
0 |
Special vselect code generation case using TableGen |
| 10:53PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 10:52PM |
3 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 10:32PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 9:59PM |
2 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 9:27PM |
2 |
DebugInfo: purpose of align field |
| 9:27PM |
0 |
Is this undefined behavior optimization legal? |
| 9:24PM |
0 |
DebugInfo: purpose of align field |
| 8:58PM |
0 |
Is this undefined behavior optimization legal? |
| 8:54PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 8:52PM |
1 |
[PPC, APFloat] Add full PPCDoubleDouble to APFloat |
| 8:51PM |
5 |
Is this undefined behavior optimization legal? |
| 8:02PM |
0 |
[PPC, APFloat] Add full PPCDoubleDouble to APFloat |
| 7:23PM |
0 |
Default alignment for 'malloc' |
| 7:06PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:05PM |
0 |
[RFC] Require PRs for XFAILing tests |
| 6:27PM |
2 |
[PPC, APFloat] Add full PPCDoubleDouble to APFloat |
| 6:14PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 6:04PM |
2 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 6:01PM |
3 |
Default alignment for 'malloc' |
| 5:59PM |
1 |
libLTO C API stability policy |
| 5:55PM |
2 |
[RFC] Require PRs for XFAILing tests |
| 5:49PM |
0 |
libLTO C API stability policy |
| 5:48PM |
0 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 5:44PM |
0 |
Bug in 3.9.0 RTDyldMemoryManager.cpp |
| 5:40PM |
0 |
[RFC] Require PRs for XFAILing tests |
| 5:38PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 5:21PM |
2 |
[RFC] Require PRs for XFAILing tests |
| 5:15PM |
0 |
Patterns & Quality Attributes Research |
| 5:02PM |
0 |
missing phabricator functionality |
| 4:56PM |
3 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 4:40PM |
2 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 4:28PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 4:17PM |
0 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 4:11PM |
4 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 3:07PM |
3 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 2:45PM |
0 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 2:42PM |
2 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 2:27PM |
0 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 2:11PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 1:53PM |
2 |
ThinLTO: module-scope inline assembly blocks |
| 1:50PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 12:43PM |
0 |
Default alignment for 'malloc' |
| 12:24PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #144, Oct 3rd 2016 |
| 11:55AM |
3 |
Default alignment for 'malloc' |
| 11:00AM |
2 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 10:49AM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 10:40AM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:43AM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:30AM |
2 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:04AM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 4:20AM |
1 |
[PowerPC] Recent branch too far breakage |
| 3:43AM |
3 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 2:56AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] improving test-suite`s FP subtests to be able to compare both exact-match outputs and more-optimized builds that may have different outputs due to FP optimizations |
| 2:43AM |
0 |
[PPC, APFloat] Add full PPCDoubleDouble to APFloat |
| 2:10AM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| |
| Sunday October 2 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:09PM |
4 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 8:48PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:43PM |
1 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 7:36PM |
0 |
Possible bug? Register classes and FP64 on targets with no FP64 support |
| 7:31PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 5:55PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 5:07PM |
4 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 4:49PM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 4:48PM |
2 |
When is a store not (memory) safe? |
| 4:37PM |
3 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 3:52PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 3:45PM |
3 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 11:02AM |
2 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 10:59AM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 9:55AM |
0 |
LLVM and java |
| 9:32AM |
2 |
LLVM and java |
| 6:46AM |
0 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 5:33AM |
15 |
Using C++14 code in LLVM |
| 4:52AM |
2 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 4:41AM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 1:30AM |
1 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| |
| Saturday October 1 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:47PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 9:20PM |
3 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 9:15PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 8:06PM |
0 |
[RFC] Require PRs for XFAILing tests |
| 6:43PM |
4 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |
| 2:40PM |
0 |
(Thin)LTO llvm build |