Taewook Oh via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-15 20:22 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
Hello all,
I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between different
fields of a structure. Following is the test program and
-print–all-alias-modref-info output:
---
; test.ll
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
%"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 }
define void @test(%"type"* %base) {
entry:
%int = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 1
%arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 0
%arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 9
%arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound access
br label %loop
loop:
%index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ]
%arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 %index
%inc = add i64 %index, 1
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10
br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit
exit:
ret void
}
; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info
-disable-output
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int
MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first
NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last
NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int
NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob
MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int
NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob
NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob
===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ==== 15 Total Alias Queries Performed
5 no alias responses (33.3%)
0 may alias responses (0.0%)
8 partial alias responses (53.3%)
2 must alias responses (13.3%)
Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13%
Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref!
---
As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index and %int. Does
anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in case of undefined behavior
(such as out-of-bound array access)? It seems that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells
that there is no alias between %arr_index and %int.
Thanks,
Taewook
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160415/0795f33a/attachment.html>
Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-21 02:20 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
----- Original Message -----> From: "Taewook Oh via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:22:27 PM > Subject: [llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields > of a structure, intentional?> Hello all,> I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between > different fields of a structure. Following is the test program and > -print–all-alias-modref-info output:> ---> ; test.ll> target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"> %"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 }> define void @test(%"type"* %base) { > entry: > %int = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 1 > %arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, > i32 0, i64 0 > %arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, > i32 0, i64 9 > %arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 > 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound accessThis is okay. Even for an inbounds GEP, addressing one-past-the-end of the array is allowed.> br label %loop> loop: > %index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ]> %arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, > i32 0, i64 %index> %inc = add i64 %index, 1 > %cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10 > br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit> exit: > ret void > }> ; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info > -disable-output> PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int > MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last > NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob > MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob > NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob > ===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ====> 15 Total Alias Queries Performed > 5 no alias responses (33.3%) > 0 may alias responses (0.0%) > 8 partial alias responses (53.3%) > 2 must alias responses (13.3%) > Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13% > Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref!> ---> As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index and > %int. Does anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in case > of undefined behavior (such as out-of-bound array access)? It seems > that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells that there is no alias between > %arr_index and %int.Please file a bug report: 1. This is a correctness bug because the result should not be PartialAlias, but MayAlias. PartialAlias should be returned only in cases where we can prove there is a partial overlap. In this case, we can't. 2. We're also missing an analysis opportunity here. We should be able to prove that %index is never greater than 9, which should be enough to provide a NoAlias result. As a test, you might try running with -scev-aa and see if that gets this case. -Hal> Thanks, > Taewook > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160420/fa971161/attachment.html>
Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-21 08:30 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
Hi,
We've seen a similar case recently, where BasicAA returns PartialAlias
for the access of two different fields of a structure.
We noticed this since Lint complained about it when checking for
aliasing beteen "noalias" attributed parameters:
opt -S -lint ./alias.ll
gave
Unusual: noalias argument aliases another argument
on the (silly) function:
%rec7 = type { i16, i16, i16 }
define void @fn1(i16* noalias %p1.1.par, i16* noalias %p2.2.par) {
%s.3 = alloca %rec7
%_tmp1 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 1
%_tmp2 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 2
call void @fn1(i16* %_tmp1, i16* %_tmp2)
ret void
}
If accessing fields 0 and 1 instead, with
%_tmp1 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 0
%_tmp2 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 1
we don't see the Lint complaint.
Regards,
Mikael
On 04/21/2016 04:20 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Taewook Oh via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>
> *To: *"via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> *Sent: *Friday, April 15, 2016 3:22:27 PM
> *Subject: *[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different
> fields of a structure, intentional?
>
> Hello all,
>
> I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between
> different fields of a structure. Following is the test program and
> -print–all-alias-modref-info output:
>
> ---
>
> ; test.ll
> target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
> target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
>
> %"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 }
>
> define void @test(%"type"* %base) {
> entry:
> %int = getelementptr inbounds %"type",
%"type"* %base, i64
> 0, i32 1
> %arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type",
%"type"* %base, i64
> 0, i32 0, i64 0
> %arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type",
%"type"* %base, i64
> 0, i32 0, i64 9
> %arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type",
%"type"* %base, i64
> 0, i32 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound access
>
> This is okay. Even for an inbounds GEP, addressing one-past-the-end of
> the array is allowed.
>
> br label %loop
>
> loop:
> %index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ]
>
> %arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type",
%"type"* %base, i64
> 0, i32 0, i64 %index
>
> %inc = add i64 %index, 1
> %cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10
> br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit
>
> exit:
> ret void
> }
>
> ; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info
> -disable-output
>
> PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int
> MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first
> NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int
> PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last
> NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int
> NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last
> PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob
> MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int
> NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob
> NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob
> PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index
> PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int
> PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index
> PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last
> PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob
> ===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ====> 15 Total Alias
Queries Performed
> 5 no alias responses (33.3%)
> 0 may alias responses (0.0%)
> 8 partial alias responses (53.3%)
> 2 must alias responses (13.3%)
> Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13%
> Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref!
>
> ---
>
> As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index
> and %int. Does anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in
> case of undefined behavior (such as out-of-bound array access)? It
> seems that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells that there is no alias
> between %arr_index and %int.
>
> Please file a bug report:
>
> 1. This is a correctness bug because the result should not be
> PartialAlias, but MayAlias. PartialAlias should be returned only in
> cases where we can prove there is a partial overlap. In this case, we
can't.
>
> 2. We're also missing an analysis opportunity here. We should be able
> to prove that %index is never greater than 9, which should be enough to
> provide a NoAlias result.
>
> As a test, you might try running with -scev-aa and see if that gets this
> case.
>
> -Hal
>
>
> Thanks,
> Taewook
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Hal Finkel
> Assistant Computational Scientist
> Leadership Computing Facility
> Argonne National Laboratory
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
Taewook Oh via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-22 15:13 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
Thanks for comments. Here's the bug report:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27478
From: Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>>
Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 9:20 PM
To: Taewook Oh <twoh at fb.com<mailto:twoh at fb.com>>
Cc: via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org>>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a
structure, intentional?
________________________________
From: "Taewook Oh via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>
To: "via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev
at lists.llvm.org>>
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:22:27 PM
Subject: [llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a
structure, intentional?
Hello all,
I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between different
fields of a structure. Following is the test program and
-print–all-alias-modref-info output:
---
; test.ll
target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
%"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 }
define void @test(%"type"* %base) {
entry:
%int = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 1
%arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 0
%arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 9
%arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound access
This is okay. Even for an inbounds GEP, addressing one-past-the-end of the array
is allowed.
br label %loop
loop:
%index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ]
%arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"*
%base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 %index
%inc = add i64 %index, 1
%cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10
br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit
exit:
ret void
}
; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info
-disable-output
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int
MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first
NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last
NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int
NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob
MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int
NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob
NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob
PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last
PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob
===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ==== 15 Total Alias Queries Performed
5 no alias responses (33.3%)
0 may alias responses (0.0%)
8 partial alias responses (53.3%)
2 must alias responses (13.3%)
Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13%
Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref!
---
As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index and %int. Does
anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in case of undefined behavior
(such as out-of-bound array access)? It seems that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells
that there is no alias between %arr_index and %int.
Please file a bug report:
1. This is a correctness bug because the result should not be PartialAlias, but
MayAlias. PartialAlias should be returned only in cases where we can prove there
is a partial overlap. In this case, we can't.
2. We're also missing an analysis opportunity here. We should be able to
prove that %index is never greater than 9, which should be enough to provide a
NoAlias result.
As a test, you might try running with -scev-aa and see if that gets this case.
-Hal
Thanks,
Taewook
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
--
Hal Finkel
Assistant Computational Scientist
Leadership Computing Facility
Argonne National Laboratory
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160422/e8bd9fb8/attachment.html>