Taewook Oh via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-15 20:22 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
Hello all, I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between different fields of a structure. Following is the test program and -print–all-alias-modref-info output: --- ; test.ll target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" %"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 } define void @test(%"type"* %base) { entry: %int = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 1 %arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 0 %arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 9 %arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound access br label %loop loop: %index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] %arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 %index %inc = add i64 %index, 1 %cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10 br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit exit: ret void } ; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info -disable-output PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob ===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ==== 15 Total Alias Queries Performed 5 no alias responses (33.3%) 0 may alias responses (0.0%) 8 partial alias responses (53.3%) 2 must alias responses (13.3%) Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13% Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref! --- As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index and %int. Does anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in case of undefined behavior (such as out-of-bound array access)? It seems that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells that there is no alias between %arr_index and %int. Thanks, Taewook -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160415/0795f33a/attachment.html>
Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-21 02:20 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
----- Original Message -----> From: "Taewook Oh via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:22:27 PM > Subject: [llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields > of a structure, intentional?> Hello all,> I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between > different fields of a structure. Following is the test program and > -print–all-alias-modref-info output:> ---> ; test.ll> target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"> %"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 }> define void @test(%"type"* %base) { > entry: > %int = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 1 > %arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, > i32 0, i64 0 > %arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, > i32 0, i64 9 > %arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 > 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound accessThis is okay. Even for an inbounds GEP, addressing one-past-the-end of the array is allowed.> br label %loop> loop: > %index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ]> %arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, > i32 0, i64 %index> %inc = add i64 %index, 1 > %cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10 > br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit> exit: > ret void > }> ; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info > -disable-output> PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int > MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last > NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob > MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob > NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob > ===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ====> 15 Total Alias Queries Performed > 5 no alias responses (33.3%) > 0 may alias responses (0.0%) > 8 partial alias responses (53.3%) > 2 must alias responses (13.3%) > Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13% > Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref!> ---> As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index and > %int. Does anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in case > of undefined behavior (such as out-of-bound array access)? It seems > that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells that there is no alias between > %arr_index and %int.Please file a bug report: 1. This is a correctness bug because the result should not be PartialAlias, but MayAlias. PartialAlias should be returned only in cases where we can prove there is a partial overlap. In this case, we can't. 2. We're also missing an analysis opportunity here. We should be able to prove that %index is never greater than 9, which should be enough to provide a NoAlias result. As a test, you might try running with -scev-aa and see if that gets this case. -Hal> Thanks, > Taewook > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160420/fa971161/attachment.html>
Mikael Holmén via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-21 08:30 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
Hi, We've seen a similar case recently, where BasicAA returns PartialAlias for the access of two different fields of a structure. We noticed this since Lint complained about it when checking for aliasing beteen "noalias" attributed parameters: opt -S -lint ./alias.ll gave Unusual: noalias argument aliases another argument on the (silly) function: %rec7 = type { i16, i16, i16 } define void @fn1(i16* noalias %p1.1.par, i16* noalias %p2.2.par) { %s.3 = alloca %rec7 %_tmp1 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 1 %_tmp2 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 2 call void @fn1(i16* %_tmp1, i16* %_tmp2) ret void } If accessing fields 0 and 1 instead, with %_tmp1 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 0 %_tmp2 = getelementptr %rec7, %rec7* %s.3, i16 0, i32 1 we don't see the Lint complaint. Regards, Mikael On 04/21/2016 04:20 AM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > *From: *"Taewook Oh via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *To: *"via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > *Sent: *Friday, April 15, 2016 3:22:27 PM > *Subject: *[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different > fields of a structure, intentional? > > Hello all, > > I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between > different fields of a structure. Following is the test program and > -print–all-alias-modref-info output: > > --- > > ; test.ll > target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" > target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" > > %"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 } > > define void @test(%"type"* %base) { > entry: > %int = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 > 0, i32 1 > %arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 > 0, i32 0, i64 0 > %arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 > 0, i32 0, i64 9 > %arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 > 0, i32 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound access > > This is okay. Even for an inbounds GEP, addressing one-past-the-end of > the array is allowed. > > br label %loop > > loop: > %index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] > > %arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 > 0, i32 0, i64 %index > > %inc = add i64 %index, 1 > %cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10 > br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit > > exit: > ret void > } > > ; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info > -disable-output > > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int > MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last > NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob > MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int > NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob > NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob > PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last > PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob > ===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ====> 15 Total Alias Queries Performed > 5 no alias responses (33.3%) > 0 may alias responses (0.0%) > 8 partial alias responses (53.3%) > 2 must alias responses (13.3%) > Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13% > Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref! > > --- > > As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index > and %int. Does anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in > case of undefined behavior (such as out-of-bound array access)? It > seems that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells that there is no alias > between %arr_index and %int. > > Please file a bug report: > > 1. This is a correctness bug because the result should not be > PartialAlias, but MayAlias. PartialAlias should be returned only in > cases where we can prove there is a partial overlap. In this case, we can't. > > 2. We're also missing an analysis opportunity here. We should be able > to prove that %index is never greater than 9, which should be enough to > provide a NoAlias result. > > As a test, you might try running with -scev-aa and see if that gets this > case. > > -Hal > > > Thanks, > Taewook > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > > > -- > Hal Finkel > Assistant Computational Scientist > Leadership Computing Facility > Argonne National Laboratory > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >
Taewook Oh via llvm-dev
2016-Apr-22 15:13 UTC
[llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
Thanks for comments. Here's the bug report: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27478 From: Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov<mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov>> Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 at 9:20 PM To: Taewook Oh <twoh at fb.com<mailto:twoh at fb.com>> Cc: via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional? ________________________________ From: "Taewook Oh via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> To: "via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:22:27 PM Subject: [llvm-dev] (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional? Hello all, I observed that BasicAA alias query returns PartialAlias between different fields of a structure. Following is the test program and -print–all-alias-modref-info output: --- ; test.ll target datalayout = "e-m:e-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128" target triple = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" %"type" = type { [10 x i32], i64 } define void @test(%"type"* %base) { entry: %int = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 1 %arr_first = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 0 %arr_last = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 9 %arr_oob = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 10 ; out-of-bound access This is okay. Even for an inbounds GEP, addressing one-past-the-end of the array is allowed. br label %loop loop: %index = phi i64 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %loop ] %arr_index = getelementptr inbounds %"type", %"type"* %base, i64 0, i32 0, i64 %index %inc = add i64 %index, 1 %cmp = icmp ult i64 %inc, 10 br i1 %cmp, label %loop, label %exit exit: ret void } ; opt < test.ll –basicaa -aa–eval -print-all-alias-modref-info -disable-output PartialAlias: %type* %base, i64* %int MustAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_first NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i64* %int PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_last NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i64* %int NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_last PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_oob MustAlias: i32* %arr_oob, i64* %int NoAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_oob NoAlias: i32* %arr_last, i32* %arr_oob PartialAlias: %type* %base, i32* %arr_index PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i64* %int PartialAlias: i32* %arr_first, i32* %arr_index PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_last PartialAlias: i32* %arr_index, i32* %arr_oob ===== Alias Analysis Evaluator Report ==== 15 Total Alias Queries Performed 5 no alias responses (33.3%) 0 may alias responses (0.0%) 8 partial alias responses (53.3%) 2 must alias responses (13.3%) Alias Analysis Evaluator Pointer Alias Summary: 33%/0%/53%/13% Alias Analysis Mod/Ref Evaluator Summary: no mod/ref! --- As you can see, BasicAA query returns PartialAlias for %arr_index and %int. Does anyone know if it is by design to be conservative in case of undefined behavior (such as out-of-bound array access)? It seems that gcc-4.9 alias analysis tells that there is no alias between %arr_index and %int. Please file a bug report: 1. This is a correctness bug because the result should not be PartialAlias, but MayAlias. PartialAlias should be returned only in cases where we can prove there is a partial overlap. In this case, we can't. 2. We're also missing an analysis opportunity here. We should be able to prove that %index is never greater than 9, which should be enough to provide a NoAlias result. As a test, you might try running with -scev-aa and see if that gets this case. -Hal Thanks, Taewook _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev -- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160422/e8bd9fb8/attachment.html>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- (BasicAA) PartialAlias between different fields of a structure, intentional?
- PartialAlias: different start addresses
- [LLVMdev] question about enabling cfl-aa and collecting a57 numbers
- PartialAlias: different start addresses
- [LLVMdev] question about enabling cfl-aa and collecting a57 numbers