Xiaochu Liu
2015-Jul-22 18:05 UTC
[LLVMdev] prevent an SDValue from lower into an immediate field in load
Hi there, I am doing relocation in my backend by calling my function getAddrNonPic: SDValue getAddrNonPIC(NodeTy *N, SDLoc DL, EVT Ty, SelectionDAG &DAG)const{ SValue Hi=getTarget(N,Ty,DAG, MyBackend::Hi16); SValue Lo=getTarget(N,Ty,DAG, MyBackend::Lo16); return DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, DL, Ty, DAG.getNode(MyBackend::Hi16, DL, Ty, Hi), DAG.getNode(MyBackend::Lo16, DL, Ty, Ho)); } But sometimes a load instruction is lowered into: (r2=lo16(symbol)) lw r1, r2(Hi16(symbol)) But what I want is: (r2=lo16(symbol)) (r3=hi16(symbol)) add r2, r2,r3 lw r1, r2(0) Can you please show me some hints? Thanks, Xiaochu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150722/cafeaaf8/attachment.html>
Krzysztof Parzyszek
2015-Jul-23 13:07 UTC
[LLVMdev] prevent an SDValue from lower into an immediate field in load
On 7/22/2015 1:05 PM, Xiaochu Liu wrote:> > But sometimes a load instruction is lowered into: > > (r2=lo16(symbol)) > lw r1, r2(Hi16(symbol)) > > But what I want is: > (r2=lo16(symbol)) > (r3=hi16(symbol)) > add r2, r2,r3 > lw r1, r2(0) > > Can you please show me some hints?This likely happens during instruction selection, but to make sure, could you run your testcase with -mllvm -debug-only=isel? This will show all steps of the translation from IR to MIR. You can then narrow down the place where this folding happens and take it from there. -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Maybe Matching Threads
- [LLVMdev] Help with definition of subregisters; spill, rematerialization and implicit uses
- [lld] R_MIPS_HI16 / R_MIPS_LO16 calculation
- [LLVMdev] Help with definition of subregisters; spill, rematerialization and implicit uses
- [LLVMdev] subregisters, def-kill
- [LLVMdev] Req-sequence, partial defs