Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Richard Sandiford < rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:> İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: > > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm > > 3.4rc1: > > Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, > which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing > with a -O0 build? >This is a 2-stage build. stage1 compiler is gcc 4.8.2+r203692 on openSUSE 13.1. And stage1 is compiled with -O0. Second stage compiler is stage1 clang and C{XX}FLAGS is not modified. I'll try second stage with -O0 now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131122/b52eea06/attachment.html>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:37 AM, İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> wrote:> Hi, > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Richard Sandiford < > rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: >> > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm >> > 3.4rc1: >> >> Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, >> which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing >> with a -O0 build? >> > > This is a 2-stage build. stage1 compiler is gcc 4.8.2+r203692 on openSUSE > 13.1. And stage1 is compiled with -O0. Second stage compiler is stage1 > clang and C{XX}FLAGS is not modified. > > I'll try second stage with -O0 now. > >That didn't change anything. Still the same 2 tests failing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131122/4fb4cdf1/attachment.html>
İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes:> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Richard Sandiford < > rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: >> > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm >> > 3.4rc1: >> >> Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, >> which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing >> with a -O0 build? >> > > This is a 2-stage build. stage1 compiler is gcc 4.8.2+r203692 on openSUSE > 13.1. And stage1 is compiled with -O0. Second stage compiler is stage1 > clang and C{XX}FLAGS is not modified.Thanks for the report, and sorry for taking a while to reproduce it. I've just committed a fix as r195731 (trunk) and r195736 (branch). Richard
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Richard Sandiford < rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:> İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Richard Sandiford < > > rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > >> İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: > >> > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with > llvm > >> > 3.4rc1: > >> > >> Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, > >> which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing > >> with a -O0 build? > >> > > > > This is a 2-stage build. stage1 compiler is gcc 4.8.2+r203692 on openSUSE > > 13.1. And stage1 is compiled with -O0. Second stage compiler is stage1 > > clang and C{XX}FLAGS is not modified. > > Thanks for the report, and sorry for taking a while to reproduce it. > I've just committed a fix as r195731 (trunk) and r195736 (branch). >Thanks a lot, will test and report back! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131126/a1b1861a/attachment.html>