search for: r203692

...90x machine I get two new regressions with llvm > > 3.4rc1: > > Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, > which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing > with a -O0 build? > This is a 2-stage build. stage1 compiler is gcc 4.8.2+r203692 on openSUSE 13.1. And stage1 is compiled with -O0. Second stage compiler is stage1 clang and C{XX}FLAGS is not modified. I'll try second stage with -O0 now. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/...

...ions with llvm >> > 3.4rc1: >> >> Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, >> which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing >> with a -O0 build? >> > > This is a 2-stage build. stage1 compiler is gcc 4.8.2+r203692 on openSUSE > 13.1. And stage1 is compiled with -O0. Second stage compiler is stage1 > clang and C{XX}FLAGS is not modified. Thanks for the report, and sorry for taking a while to reproduce it. I've just committed a fix as r195731 (trunk) and r195736 (branch). Richard

İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm > 3.4rc1: Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, which compiler are you using to build? Do you see the same thing with a -O0 build? Thanks, Richard > [ 1412s] >

Hi, Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm 3.4rc1: [ 1412s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitVectorTest.cpp:39: Failure [ 1412s] Value of: Vec.count() [ 1412s] Actual: 1 [ 1412s] Expected: 5U [ 1412s] Which is: 5 [ 1412s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/llvm/unittests/ADT/BitVectorTest.cpp:42: Failure [ 1412s] Value of: Vec.all() [ 1412s]