search for: sandiford

Hi, On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Richard Sandiford < rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: > > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm > > 3.4rc1: > > Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one possibility, > which comp...

...<asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] SetVarCDR You must have some fux0red config 'cause using _X. works fine here. I haven't had an 's' in my CDRs for over several months now. (continue this on the -users list.) -Matthew > From: "William M. Sandiford" <wsandiford@DURHAMTELECOM.com> > Reply-To: "Asterisk Developers Mailing List > <asterisk-dev@lists.digium.com>" <Asterisk-Dev@lists.digium.com> > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:41:30 -0500 > To: Asterisk Developers Mailing List <asterisk-dev@lists.digium...

We should find a code owner for the scalarizer (lib/Transforms/Scalar/Scalarizer.cpp). I nominate Richard Sandiford, who added it in r195471. Let me know what you think. Thanks, Hans

I recently upgraded my Asterisk system to the latest CVS-HEAD Asterisk CVS HEAD built by bill@localhost on a i686 running Linux on 2005-10-12 13:34:09 UTC Ever since this upgrade, the system is jumping n+101 if it gets a busy on a Dial command, it is now proceeding to the next priority (n+1) Has something changed with this? Is there a way to change it back? Thanks, Bill --------------

Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? > The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing > scalarisation at the IR level, without even looking at the function. As an alternative, adding S...

Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> writes: > On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford > <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >>> Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? >>> The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing >>...

Hi Richard, The discussion on llvmpipe is irrelevant. llvmpipe has its own pass manager and optimization pipe, it is not a C compiler. Nadav On Nov 15, 2013, at 3:26 AM, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Nadav Rotem <nrotem at apple.com> writes: >> On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford >> <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >>> Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >>&g...

On Nov 14, 2013, at 2:32 PM, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> Are you worried that adding it to PMB will increase compile time? >> The pass exits very early for any target that doesn't opt-in to doing >> scalarisation a...

MipsOptimizeMathLibCalls.cpp converts: g = sqrt (f); into: r1 = sqrt (f) readonly; if (g is a NaN) r2 = sqrt (f); g = phi (r1, r2) I'd like to do the same on z. Would it be OK to make this pass generic and do the transformation whenever FSQRT isLegalOrCustom for the type? If so, should it stay a separate pass, or should I merge it with something else? Thanks, Richard

Ping. Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > MipsOptimizeMathLibCalls.cpp converts: > > g = sqrt (f); > > into: > > r1 = sqrt (f) readonly; > if (g is a NaN) > r2 = sqrt (f); > g = phi (r1, r2) > > I'd like to do the same on z. Would it be OK...

İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Richard Sandiford < > rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> İsmail Dönmez <ismail at donmez.ws> writes: >> > Using openSUSE 13.1 on s390x machine I get two new regressions with llvm >> > 3.4rc1: >> >> Hmm, I don't see this locally. Just to rule out one poss...

Richard Sandiford wrote: >I'd like to step down as code owner for the SystemZ port and nominate >Ulrich Weigand to take over. Sorry for not doing this sooner. I'd be happy to take over that role. Thanks for all your work on SystemZ, Richard! Bye, Ulrich

On 25 October 2013 11:06, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com>wrote: > I wanted the same thing for SystemZ, which doesn't have vectors, > in order to improve the llvmpipe code. > Hi Richard, This is a nice patch. I was wondering how hard it'd be to do that, and it seems that you're catching lots of...

Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> writes: > On 25 October 2013 11:06, Richard Sandiford <rsandifo at linux.vnet.ibm.com>wrote>> It would also need some TargetTransformInfo hooks to decide which >> vectors should be decomposed. > > If I got it right, this may not be necessary, or it may even be harmful. > > Say you decide that <4 x i32> vectors shoul...

On 02/25/2014 09:30 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> writes: >> On 02/24/2014 04:42 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:40 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >>>> I need to leave soon and will take a look in the morning. >>>&g...

On 02/25/2014 02:38 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:32 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >> On 02/25/2014 09:30 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote: >>> reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> writes: >>>> On 02/24/2014 04:42 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 4:40 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: >>>>>> I need to leave soon and will take a loo...

...ions best to the vector hardware, and just help it with the parallelism knowledge propagated from the parallel program. One can then fall back to the original (hand vectorized) code in case the autovectorization failed, to get some vector hardware utilization still. On 10/25/2013 04:15 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > To be honest I hadn't really thought about targets with vector units > at all.:-) I was just assuming that we'd want to keep vector operations > together if there's native support. E.g. ISTR comments about not wanting > to rewrite vec_selects because it can be ha...

..., I think it makes sense to formalize what is already true inside of Mips, to the larger community that may contribute to Mips. We have licensees with their own variations and extensions and there will be other people wanting to make changes to the Mips code generator outside of Mips. Richard Sandiford has held this position for the gcc Mips port for many years and it has helped greatly to make that code generator solid. Reed

...m-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Aug 19, 2015, at 9:50 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > > > We should find a code owner for the scalarizer > > (lib/Transforms/Scalar/Scalarizer.cpp). > > > > I nominate Richard Sandiford, who added it in r195471. > > > > Let me know what you think. > > I think it would make sense to look for someone a bit more granular, even > though it’s a harder problem: it would be great to find an owner for the > mid-level optimizer, including scalar,IPA,IPO, and perhaps...

Hello: I found a reference to the application SetVarCDR in the following post but I don't seem to have this available to me in my version of *. HYPERLINK "http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-cvs/2005-February/005337.html"http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-cvs/2005-February/005337.html My version of * is CVS-HEAD-03/10/05-18:42:35 I would like to change the