Rafael Espíndola
2013-May-27 23:47 UTC
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
> AFAIK, libSupport does more than what this document describes (for example, > it contains ADT, which are portable and not system-specific, contrary to the > second paragraph of the document). Does it make sense to just globally > replace "Support" for "System"? I wasn't around when the transition was > made, so I don't know. Please get a confirmation from someone who can speak > authoritatively about the transition from libSystem to libSupport. Other > than that, LGTM.System got merged into Support a long time ago. We could improve the documentation of what lib/Support is, but this is a good start IMHO. Cheers, Rafael
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:> > AFAIK, libSupport does more than what this document describes (for > example, > > it contains ADT, which are portable and not system-specific, contrary to > the > > second paragraph of the document). Does it make sense to just globally > > replace "Support" for "System"? I wasn't around when the transition was > > made, so I don't know. Please get a confirmation from someone who can > speak > > authoritatively about the transition from libSystem to libSupport. Other > > than that, LGTM. > > System got merged into Support a long time ago. We could improve the > documentation of what lib/Support is, but this is a good start IMHO. >Ah, ok. In that case, I think that it would be best to make a new page for libSupport, and have it defer to SystemLibrary.rst for discussion of the "libSystem" parts of libSupport. The major necessary changes for SystemLibrary.rst would then be to mention its inclusion in libSupport (important) and fix file paths (mechanical, less important). -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130527/bc92f9a6/attachment.html>
罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo)
2013-May-28 01:17 UTC
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
Looking for suggestion about Support library document improvement. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130528/1c848cf7/attachment.html>
Rafael Espíndola
2013-May-28 01:36 UTC
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
> Ah, ok. In that case, I think that it would be best to make a new page for > libSupport, and have it defer to SystemLibrary.rst for discussion of the > "libSystem" parts of libSupport. The major necessary changes for > SystemLibrary.rst would then be to mention its inclusion in libSupport > (important) and fix file paths (mechanical, less important).Sorry, but at least for me having a docs/SystemLibrary.rst and so lib/System is very confusing. Ideally we would have a docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever is in lib/Support. Cheers, Rafael
Seemingly Similar Threads
- [LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
- [LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
- [LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
- [LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
- [LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.