search for: portability

On January 22, 2019 10:45, I wrote: > On January 21, 2019 19:00, Darren Tucker wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 12:01, Randall S. Becker > > <rsbecker at nexbridge.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I finally got around to trying to test the 7.7p1 release on the HPE > > > NonStop Platform. 7.6p1 worked just fine - no

Hi All, I finally got around to trying to test the 7.7p1 release on the HPE NonStop Platform. 7.6p1 worked just fine - no issues at all. In 7.7p1, when the agent test ran, the following happened (prior tests worked perfectly): run test agent.sh ... Couldn't open logfile /home/git/openssh-portable/regress/ssh.log: Permission denied agent fwd failed (exit code 1) failed simple agent test

Hello! I need an official portable version Wine. I google it but i could not find something. Some users told me where is no a portable version of Wine but i think it possible to make it. Because yesterday I downloaded from official site of Teamviewer the portable Linux version ( http://www.teamviewer.com/en/download/index.aspx ). Teamviewer has make his own portable Wine and Teamviewer works

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Tom G. Christensen wrote: > On 12/02/16 04:56, Damien Miller wrote: > > Portable OpenSSH is available via Git at > > https://anongit.mindrot.org/openssh.git/ or via a mirror on Github at > > https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable > > > > I'm seeing a hang in the testsuite on Solaris: > run test transfer.sh ... > transfer data:

Thanks very much for all of your answer. I was confused by definition of 'portable' by my own thinking. Now I Correct that. (ILP32 is in another project, It's my typo. Thanks) So let me make a conclusion about this. LLVM IR can be a portable language, just depending on our front-end configuration or origin language limits. Did I mistake that? Thank a lot all of you. 2010/12/22

Thread split from my previous communication. Here is the integrity logs on the platform. I had to cut this should due to the length of the logs (5Mb). ***************** failed-regress.log ************ trace: test integrity: hmac-sha1 @2900 FAIL: unexpected error mac hmac-sha1 at 2900: Bytes per second: sent 65665.7, received 55994.0. trace: test integrity: hmac-sha1 @2901 FAIL:

Dear all, I cannot find the answer of this question. We all know LLVM IR is portable, but it uses ILP32 and record the target layout within the IR. target datalayout = "e-p:64:64:64-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64 :64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-s0:64:64-f80:128:128-n8:16:32:64" target triple = "x86_64-linux-gnu" It seems it already assigned

Hi, I'm trying to migrate a VM from one libvirt 0.7.6-1 (qemu-kvm 0.11.1+dfsg-1) to another libvirt 0.7.6-2 (qemu-kvm 0.11.1+dfsg-1) connected with SSH , i have followed pre requite (same shared, same path, same network conf ...) . But when i migrate , i have following error : operation failed: /migration to 'tcp:x.x.x.x:49157' failed: migration failed DETAIL : Unable to migrate

Pertti Kellomäki schrieb: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> Many aspects of the target compiler can leak through. > > So if one wants to use the LLVM system as a cross compiler, one > has to configure llvm-gcc as a cross compiler? Fair enough, I guess. I hope the C backend is still meant to generate portable code though. Philipp

OpenSSH Security Advisory: portable-keysign-rand-helper.adv This document may be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/portable-keysign-rand-helper.adv 1. Vulnerability Portable OpenSSH's ssh-keysign utility may allow unauthorised local access to host keys on platforms if ssh-rand-helper is used. 2. Affected configurations Portable OpenSSH prior to version

I have two questions regarding number portability... 1) If I port a DID over to Voicepulse, can I then move that DID elsewhere somewhere down the road. Or does voicepulse now OWN that DID? 2) Can I take a DID assigned by Voicepulse and transfer it to someone else? If not, why? -jwb

...rget compiler can leak through. > > > > So if one wants to use the LLVM system as a cross compiler, one > > has to configure llvm-gcc as a cross compiler? Fair enough, I guess. > > I hope the C backend is still meant to generate portable code though. It generates C99. Its portability is no better or worse than any other backend. Again, it is the front end that decides how portable the outcome can be. If the front end uses non-portable constructs (sizeof, ifdef code, etc.) then the code produced won't be portable either. To get LLVM to generate portable code, you must start...

OpenSSH Security Advisory: portable-keysign-rand-helper.adv This document may be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/portable-keysign-rand-helper.adv 1. Vulnerability Portable OpenSSH's ssh-keysign utility may allow unauthorised local access to host keys on platforms if ssh-rand-helper is used. 2. Affected configurations Portable OpenSSH prior to version

Hello, I manage OpenSSH on a dozen or so servers that act as gateways for a large amount of developers and system administrators. On these servers it is common for there to be more than 1000 active X11 forwards active at peak usage. Beyond ~1000 active X11 forwards, sshd will fail to bind additional ports due to a hard coded range check in channels.c that limits the port range that sshd will

....Call or .External, since such interfaces are subject to change without notice and will probably result in your code terminating the R process?. However, the R function of my package that calls the C++ code uses the Call function. Does it mean that I cannot submit my package to CRAN because the portability is not guaranteed?. Then, how could I to call C++ code so that my package were portable?. I hope you can clarify my doubts. I have seen the collection of prior postings to the list, but I have not found a specifical answer to my doubts . Thank you very much in advance. Best regards, Guillermo

Hi, I am just back to using WINE after several years. Linux has come a long way since then as has WINE. Because of my work I use several different computers during a week and therefore have compiled all of my windows friendly apps into portables several of which are not availible for linux. Is there currently a way to use my portables (on the thumbdrive) via wine? I would be totally MS free

I'm setting up a new Samba-based AD domain. The domain will be used to authenticate access to both Windows and Linux desktops and portables. When a Windows portable is not able to access the AD servers (e.g. you are using a portable outside of the office) you can still happily logon using cached credentials (as long as the user logged on the pc at least once before). Is there a way to get

After getting OpenSSH 7.7 to build :), the initial test fails as follows: test_kex: ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................ ............................................................................

Jeff Cohen wrote: > VS has a 64-bit portability mode, where it will complain when it sees > non-portable code. I haven't tried it yet on LLVM, but in my experience > it will generate a *lot* of warnings. Every time a size_t or ptrdiff_t > is assigned to an int or even a long it will complain (Microsoft defines > long as 32-...

...re picking a very specific definition of what a VM is.  LLVM certainly isn't a high level virtual machine like Java, but that's exactly the feature that makes it a practical target for C-family languages.  It isn't LLVM's fault that people want LLVM to magically solve all of C's portability problems. Chris, This is a very simplistic point of view, and TBH, I'm a bit shocked. Having a "nicer codebase" and "friendlier community" are two strong points for LLVM against GCC, but they're too weak to migrate people from GCC to LLVM. JIT, "the native clien...