search for: systemlibrary

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "systemlibrary".

2013 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
> Ah, ok. In that case, I think that it would be best to make a new page for > libSupport, and have it defer to SystemLibrary.rst for discussion of the > "libSystem" parts of libSupport. The major necessary changes for > SystemLibrary.rst would then be to mention its inclusion in libSupport > (important) and fix file paths (mechanical, less important). Sorry, but at least for me having a docs/SystemLib...
2013 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ah, ok. In that case, I think that it would be best to make a new page > for > > libSupport, and have it defer to SystemLibrary.rst for discussion of the > > "libSystem" parts of libSupport. The major necessary changes for > > SystemLibrary.rst would then be to mention its inclusion in libSupport > > (important) and fix file paths (mechanical, less important). > > Sorry, but at least for me...
2013 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...Other > > than that, LGTM. > > System got merged into Support a long time ago. We could improve the > documentation of what lib/Support is, but this is a good start IMHO. > Ah, ok. In that case, I think that it would be best to make a new page for libSupport, and have it defer to SystemLibrary.rst for discussion of the "libSystem" parts of libSupport. The major necessary changes for SystemLibrary.rst would then be to mention its inclusion in libSupport (important) and fix file paths (mechanical, less important). -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML att...
2013 May 27
3
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
> AFAIK, libSupport does more than what this document describes (for example, > it contains ADT, which are portable and not system-specific, contrary to the > second paragraph of the document). Does it make sense to just globally > replace "Support" for "System"? I wasn't around when the transition was > made, so I don't know. Please get a confirmation
2013 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
>> Ideally we would have a >> docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been >> merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever >> is in lib/Support. > > > Considering our OS portability layer to be it's own separate thing, even if > it isn't its own lib/* directo...
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
I hit upon docs/SystemLibrary.rst today. Is this documentation useful to anyone? Can I delete it? Most of the guidelines seem like common sense: Keeping LLVM Portable, High Level Interface, No Unused Functionality, No Duplicate Implementations, etc. Some are not really true, like "Minimize Soft Errors". We curren...
2013 May 26
2
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
On 25 May 2013 15:30, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > This will break existing URLs. Until we have a way to set up redirects the > file name should stay the same. Would a SystemLibrary.rst saying it was replaced with the support library be ok? > -- Sean Silva Cheers, Rafael
2013 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
>From 1d658dd52ca3973109e370103a7dd3485a4ee11f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang at gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:07:16 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] The System library is merged into Support library. --- docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- docs/index.rst | 4 +- 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/SystemLibrary.rst b/docs/SystemLibrary.rst index 0d0f4fa..4c6226c 100644 --- a/docs/SystemLibrary.rst +++ b/docs/SystemLibrary.rst @@ -...
2013 May 27
3
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...gang at gmail.com>写道: > From 1d658dd52ca3973109e370103a7dd3485a4ee11f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Yonggang Luo <luoyonggang at gmail.com> > Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 00:07:16 +0800 > Subject: [PATCH] The System library is merged into Support library. > > --- > docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 104 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- > docs/index.rst | 4 +- > 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/SystemLibrary.rst b/docs/SystemLibrary.rst > index 0d0f4fa..4c6226c 100644 > --- a/docs/SystemLibrary.rst...
2013 May 25
4
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------ docs/index.rst | 6 +- 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/SupportLibrary.rst b/docs/SupportLibrary.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000..36ab49a --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/SupportLibrary.rst...
2009 Jul 17
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 2/2] Make Program::ExecuteNoWait return a process ID.
Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar <daniel <at> zuster.org> writes: > > Ultimately I think a better API would be to provide a generic class > which represents an executed operating system process, and includes > operations to wait for its completion, redirect its IO, communicate > with it, etc. This would be a big improvement over the current > monolithic function. I agree,
2009 Jul 17
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH 2/2] Make Program::ExecuteNoWait return a process ID.
...e to have it? You can't use the pid (assigned from as a number) without going through another llvm::sys interface, so why should it be exposed? I don't personally care too much -- and favor pragmatism -- but it is counter to the documented design of the system library: http://llvm.org/docs/SystemLibrary.html - Daniel > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
2013 May 26
1
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...of automation. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 25, 2013, at 7:27 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e >> docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------ >> docs/index.rst | 6 +- >> 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/docs/SupportLibrary.rst b/docs/SupportLibrary.rst >> new file mode 100644 >> index 0000000.....
2013 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...e an accident caused by some sort of automation. Sent from my iPhone On May 25, 2013, at 7:27 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > 0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e > docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------ > docs/index.rst | 6 +- > 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/SupportLibrary.rst b/docs/SupportLibrary.rst > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..36ab49a > --- /dev/n...
2013 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
This will break existing URLs. Until we have a way to set up redirects the file name should stay the same. -- Sean Silva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20130525/3f6449ed/attachment.html>
2008 Feb 14
1
[LLVMdev] Bug Report - Broken versions of FC6-GCC.4.1.1 when complie llvm-2.2 source