Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "supportlibrary".
2013 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...ort
> (important) and fix file paths (mechanical, less important).
Sorry, but at least for me having a docs/SystemLibrary.rst and so
lib/System is very confusing. Ideally we would have a
docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been
merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever
is in lib/Support.
Cheers,
Rafael
2013 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
>> Ideally we would have a
>> docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been
>> merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever
>> is in lib/Support.
>
>
> Considering our OS portability layer to be it's own separate thing, even if
> it isn't its own lib/* directory is probably a good distinction to make
> regardless. And SystemLibrary.rst is well-written and has excellent...
2013 May 25
4
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e
docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------
docs/index.rst | 6 +-
3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/SupportLibrary.rst b/docs/SupportLibrary.rst
new file...
2013 May 26
1
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...PC" to "Support V IPC". This seems to be an accident caused by some sort of automation.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 25, 2013, at 7:27 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e
>> docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------
>> docs/index.rst | 6 +-
>> 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/docs/SupportLibra...
2013 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...h has changed "System V IPC" to "Support V IPC". This seems to be an accident caused by some sort of automation.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 25, 2013, at 7:27 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote:
> 0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e
> docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------
> docs/index.rst | 6 +-
> 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/SupportLibrary.rst b/docs/Suppo...
2013 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...he second sentence of <
http://llvm.org/docs/SystemLibrary.html> (describing the purpose), which is
not accurate about libSupport as a whole).
> Ideally we would have a
> docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been
> merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever
> is in lib/Support.
>
Considering our OS portability layer to be it's own separate thing, even if
it isn't its own lib/* directory is probably a good distinction to make
regardless. And SystemLibrary.rst is well-written and has excellent,
focused content about...
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...) and No Virtual Methods.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Ideally we would have a
> >> docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been
> >> merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever
> >> is in lib/Support.
> >
> >
> > Considering our OS portability layer to be it's own separate thing, even
> if
> > it isn't its own lib/* directory is probably a good distinction to make
> > regardless. And SystemLibrary.rs...
2013 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Rafael Espíndola <
rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote:
> > AFAIK, libSupport does more than what this document describes (for
> example,
> > it contains ADT, which are portable and not system-specific, contrary to
> the
> > second paragraph of the document). Does it make sense to just globally
> > replace "Support"
2013 May 27
3
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
> AFAIK, libSupport does more than what this document describes (for example,
> it contains ADT, which are portable and not system-specific, contrary to the
> second paragraph of the document). Does it make sense to just globally
> replace "Support" for "System"? I wasn't around when the transition was
> made, so I don't know. Please get a confirmation