search for: supportlibrary

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "supportlibrary".

2013 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...ort > (important) and fix file paths (mechanical, less important). Sorry, but at least for me having a docs/SystemLibrary.rst and so lib/System is very confusing. Ideally we would have a docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever is in lib/Support. Cheers, Rafael
2013 May 28
2
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
>> Ideally we would have a >> docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been >> merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever >> is in lib/Support. > > > Considering our OS portability layer to be it's own separate thing, even if > it isn't its own lib/* directory is probably a good distinction to make > regardless. And SystemLibrary.rst is well-written and has excellent...
2013 May 25
4
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------ docs/index.rst | 6 +- 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/SupportLibrary.rst b/docs/SupportLibrary.rst new file...
2013 May 26
1
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...PC" to "Support V IPC". This seems to be an accident caused by some sort of automation. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 25, 2013, at 7:27 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e >> docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------ >> docs/index.rst | 6 +- >> 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/docs/SupportLibra...
2013 May 26
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...h has changed "System V IPC" to "Support V IPC". This seems to be an accident caused by some sort of automation. Sent from my iPhone On May 25, 2013, at 7:27 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <luoyonggang at gmail.com> wrote: > 0b5c0c9c868213fee1a8e3b571a96e2e099e8e1e > docs/SupportLibrary.rst | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > docs/SystemLibrary.rst | 247 ------------------------------------------------ > docs/index.rst | 6 +- > 3 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 250 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/docs/SupportLibrary.rst b/docs/Suppo...
2013 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...he second sentence of < http://llvm.org/docs/SystemLibrary.html> (describing the purpose), which is not accurate about libSupport as a whole). > Ideally we would have a > docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been > merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever > is in lib/Support. > Considering our OS portability layer to be it's own separate thing, even if it isn't its own lib/* directory is probably a good distinction to make regardless. And SystemLibrary.rst is well-written and has excellent, focused content about...
2013 Nov 19
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
...) and No Virtual Methods. On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ideally we would have a > >> docs/SystemLibrary.rst that would just says "this library has been > >> merged to lib/Support" and docs/SupportLibrary.rst documents whatever > >> is in lib/Support. > > > > > > Considering our OS portability layer to be it's own separate thing, even > if > > it isn't its own lib/* directory is probably a good distinction to make > > regardless. And SystemLibrary.rs...
2013 May 28
0
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > AFAIK, libSupport does more than what this document describes (for > example, > > it contains ADT, which are portable and not system-specific, contrary to > the > > second paragraph of the document). Does it make sense to just globally > > replace "Support"
2013 May 27
3
[LLVMdev] The system library is gone for a long time.
> AFAIK, libSupport does more than what this document describes (for example, > it contains ADT, which are portable and not system-specific, contrary to the > second paragraph of the document). Does it make sense to just globally > replace "Support" for "System"? I wasn't around when the transition was > made, so I don't know. Please get a confirmation