search for: buildbot

Hi, I had cloned zorg from https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/zorg/trunk, then I try to start the buildbot master located in buildbot/osuosl/master (the absolute path is /nfs/home/hongbin.zheng/buildbot/zorg/buildbot/osuosl/master) by simply typing "buildbot start" And I get something like this from my twistd.log: --- <exception caught here> --- File "/usr/lib/python2.7/...

Hongbin, Did you tweak sys.path? # Extend paths to allow loading zorg and config modules. import os, sys path = os.path.join(os.environ.get('HOME'), 'zorg', 'buildbot', 'osuosl', 'master') if path not in sys.path: sys.path.append(path) path = os.path.join(os.environ.get('HOME'), 'zorg') if path not in sys.path: sys.path.append(path) 'zorg' is expected to be located on $(HOME)/zorg. 2012/11/16 Hongbin Zheng <e...

...Sands because it seemed that they have contributed the most code to Zorg Organisation ========= The current organisation of the Zorg repository doesn't make a huge amount of sense from my perspective. There are two things that we should be able to do with this code - Run the currently in use buildbot master. - Run a builtbot master and slave on a local machine for testing. The current project layout doesn't seem to facilitate either of these needs particularly well. If we take a look at ``/buildbot/osuosl/master`` the ``zorg`` folder isn't in here so the ``master.cfg`` adds a non porta...

> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-lucid-x86 on > Network UPS Tools. > Full details are available at: > http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/builds/78 If I understand this correctly, there are multiple copies of some of the man page names in the a...

Hi folks, *tl;dr* I'm having some trouble setting up a Windows buildbot and I'm looking for someone with LLVM-on-Windows experience to help me. *Long story* Hans Wennborg recently pointed <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141803.html>out <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-May/141803.html>, that we're missing a 32 bit Wi...

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:03 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Could we change the buildbot config to treat > warnings-as-errors-that-continue in the build step? (so we get the benefit > of further execution tests, while still sending fail-mail, etc for the > warning?) > > That sounds reasonable, although the buildbot implementation seems to be pretty focused on make: https...

On 2009-07-15 23:24, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Jul 15, 2009, at 11:52 AMPDT, Stuart Hastings wrote: > > >> We've had a lot of churn in all the trunks (llvm, llvm-gcc, clang) >> recently, and the testing buildbots have been failing repeatedly. >> >> I spoke with Chris this AM, and he suggested we have a "stabilization >> day." Please avoid large, destabilizing changes for about twenty-four >> hours. We would like for the testing bots to begin working again. >>...

Greetings, I would like to propose adding a buildbot which builds with -Werror. The reason for a new buildbot in this configuration is twofold: 1. It helps users who track and release from ToT, because they (generally) seem to build with -Werror. Speaking from experience :-), new warnings tend to crop up in a large range of commits, and end up block...

Just received this: The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-ppc-linux on llvm. Full details are available at: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/builders/llvm-ppc-linux/builds/3229 Buildbot URL: http://google1.osuosl.org:8011/ Buildslave for this Build: nick1 Build Reason: Build Source Stamp: 84759 Blamelist: ofv BUILD F...

Hi all, There's been a recent bootstrap failure that might be covered up because of another failure. I just wanted to point this out so that people can take a look: -bw Here's the failure from our buildbot: Assertion failed: (DestReg == VirtReg && "Unknown load situation!"), function RewriteMBB, file /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/build.llvm- gcc-x86_64-darwin10-selfhost/llvmCore.roots/llvmCore~obj/src/lib/ CodeGen/VirtRegRewriter.cpp, line 2294. /Volumes/Sandbox/Buildbot/llvm/...

...his is the one that's messing up. Could someone take a look at > this and see why it's failing? It doesn't even seem to be getting to > the "svn" checkout. > > Hi Bill, [sorry I was not subscribed to llvm-testresults, and noticed this only now] This is a buildbot bug apparently, see http://buildbot.net/trac/ticket/284 and http://buildbot.net/trac/ticket/255. You can fix this on the buildbot *slave* by editing your buildbot.tac file, and adding this line: usepty = 0 I had the same problem for a buildbot I run for another project, and after adding that line...

...know. I'll try to keep them a bit more reasonable in future. > -----Original Message----- > From: NAKAMURA Takumi [mailto:geek4civic at gmail.com] > Sent: 15 November 2013 16:28 > To: Daniel Sanders > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List; Galina Kistanova > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Buildbot skipping commits? > > It's a bug in buildbot. Longer (than 1024, I guess) commit message might let > buildbot commits ignored. > When buildbot is configured with mysql, such a check is done. > > FYI, my buildbot tweaks longer commit log, for example; > http://bb.pgr.jp/ch...

These URLs don't work for me. How do I know what is broken? It builds fine on my x86 linux box. -----Original Message----- From: buildbot at google1.osuosl.org [mailto:buildbot at google1.osuosl.org] Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 5:12 PM To: Sanjiv Kumar Gupta - I00171 Cc: llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: buildbot failure in llvm on llvm-i686-linux The Buildbot has detected a new failure of llvm-i686-linux on llvm. Full det...

...kupstools.org/doc/2.2.0/configure.html Those are good for an overview of the process, but you can always get the latest help by running "./configure --help". > Should I place my parameters inside ./configure as variables, or I > should pass those parameters to ./configure (so what buildbot does, just > "make")? I meant that you can run "./configure --with-whatever --without-something-else --enable-maintainer-mode". You don't need to edit the configure script directly - it gets rebuilt with autoreconf. You can see the commands that will be run by looking a...

Could we change the buildbot config to treat warnings-as-errors-that-continue in the build step? (so we get the benefit of further execution tests, while still sending fail-mail, etc for the warning?) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:00 PM, David Jones via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Greetings, > >...

Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at our end? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang -Andrzej On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova...

On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, David Greene<dag at cray.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:43, Török Edwin wrote: > >> How about starting simple, and just auto-tagging builds that work? >> Could be done per OS/arch, and one global tag when all buildbots pass. > > We've talked about this before and I've been working on setting up > such a system.  Unfortunately, I can't figure out why my buildbots > fail to configure llvm-gcc. I plan to check my buildbot configuration "stuff" into the llvm-project repository soon...

Hi Paula, This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x apparently does not have that method. The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so so far. That should not prevent your bot from connecting. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com&gt...

...e >> C++ side of it. This was a rocky day, but I suppose that's what I get >> for failing to stage the change in smaller pieces. >> >> As of r223916 (lldb), I'm not aware of any remaining (in-tree) breakage, >> so if I've missed some problem in the sea of buildbot errors, please >> flag me down. >> >> I'll follow up soon with bitcode and assembly changes! > > Hi Duncan, > > I started getting random assertion failures in some tests yesterday, and I think > it may be related to this change. Here is the stack trace: >...

Ah, ...no. please don't hesitate to write logs ;) It must be the subject in the buildbot, not in developer guys. Galina, I'll write up later, how to tweak this issue. It is not resolved in released versions, though. The easiest way is to tweak svnpoller. 2013/11/16 Daniel Sanders <Daniel.Sanders at imgtec.com>: > That would explain it. The commit messages were quite long...