search for: lnt

Hi, working on the LNT documentation I am wondering about a few things: - LNT documentation recommends to do `easy_install lnt==0.4.2dev` (in the install box on the left side of the title page). The last available version of LNT on pypy is version 0.4.0 from 2012. Are there plans to keep this up to date or should we bet...

Hi, So, I owe you all an apology. I was totally unaware that the llvm.org server, running at UIUC, was still in operation and hosting an active LNT instance. I was under the assumption the LNT server ran elsewhere. As a result, the ability for the LNT bots to submit run information to the "old" LNT server is now gone. I am very sorry for this oversight. In speaking with Chris Matthews this afternoon he suggested we ask all of you...

Hi, I noticed that easy_install of lnt 0.4.1dev doesn't work: # easy_install lnt==0.4.1dev Searching for lnt==0.4.1dev Reading https://pypi.python.org/simple/lnt/ No local packages or download links found for lnt==0.4.1dev error: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('lnt==0.4.1dev') -Gabriel --------...

Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I get this error: (mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox --cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite test-suite nt.py:1185: note: inferred C++ co...

I updated the docs to show a pip/svn install like this: pip install svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk <svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk> > On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > >> On 18 Jul 2017, at 20:21, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org <mailto:daniel at zuster.org>> wrote: >> >&...

...package down, or start to update it. > > The docs builds work for me. Is it possible that is not in your venv or > something like that? > > > On Jul 18, 2017, at 10:48 AM, Matthias Braun <mbraun at apple.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > working on the LNT documentation I am wondering about a few things: > > > > - LNT documentation recommends to do `easy_install lnt==0.4.2dev` (in > the install box on the left side of the title page). The last available > version of LNT on pypy is version 0.4.0 from 2012. Are there plans to keep &gt...

Hi, I follow quick-start guide http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html to run LLVM test-suite. It looks like I either make a mistake or the guide is not correct. Here is the command used to run nightly test: [[ $ lnt runtest nt --sandbox=$PWD/test-suite.bld \ --small --test-style=nightly \ --cc=$PWD/llvm.bld/Release+Asserts/bin/clang \ --c...

I followed the lnt quickstart <http://llvm.org/docs/lnt/quickstart.html> directions but got this diagnostic when doing the setup: bash-3.2$ ~/mysandbox/bin/python ~/lnt/setup.py develop /Users/dcallahan/mysandbox/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/dist.py:284: UserWarning: The version spec\ ified require...

On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the > instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I > get this error: > > (mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox > --cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite test-suite > nt.p...

Folks, I'm scratching my head to understand what's wrong with this bot: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt/builds/7783/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/stdio There were no recent commits to lnt or the test-suite and I've cleaned the lnt.venv on the bot, but it's still failing. I also haven't updated the packages or anything on the bot. Can any LNT specialist have a look and see if I'm missi...

Hi, I have a question regarding to lnt. We are working on NEC SX-Aurora Vector Engine and preparing for upstreaming it on https://reviews.llvm.org/D69103 and following reviews. We are running llvm-test-suite to check our modifications often. To run this test suite, we need to specify our architecture to lnt and make program running u...

> And it doesn't match probably because of one of two things (& I forget > which of the two, if either, have been addressed/workaround): > > 1) using cmake instead of configure/make > 2) using git instead of svn > > One or both of these create versions that lnt doesn't understand > (because they don't include the SVN revision number in the clang > version info) - if I recall correctly. Yup, that sounds like the problem. I'm using CMake AND git :) > Yes, LNT could probably be improved not to completely fall over on > this, and/or...

Hi, I have recently moved the clang-native-arm-lnt-perf bot from the nt producer to the test-suite producer. It seems to be working fine but it doesn't manage to submit the results to http://lnt.llvm.org/submitRun. If you scroll down to the bottom of [1], you can see this error message: 2017-08-28 07:06:32: submitting result to 'http://lnt...

Hi, The new LNT server instance http://lnt.llvm.org seems to fail in many cases. Any entrance to a 'Run page' (e.g. http://lnt.llvm.org/db_default/v4/nts/62475) and lately also many perf bots result submissions (e.g. http://lab.llvm.org:8014/builders/clang-native-arm-lnt-perf/builds/2262/steps/test-suite/l...

I am trying to run Gimpel's PC-Lint under Wine, and am running into trouble. It is a simple DOS text-mode program, nothing fancy, no graphics, uses stdin, stdout, and stderr. It is invoked thus: In the batch file LIN.BAT: wine Lint-nt +v -i"C:\Lint" "C:\Lint\std.lnt" File std.lnt is a list of optional parameters to Lint-nt that contains this: lnt\au-sm.lnt gnu.lnt options.lnt -si4 -sp4 -iC:\Lint\src C:\Lint\src where... lnt is a directory containing, among other things, au-sm.lnt au-sm.lnt, options.lnt, and gnu.lnt contain more config...

On 8 January 2013 04:49, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > While this should be investigated, > I'm tempted to just move everything over to LNT instead... > That's the latent bugs that David mentioned. I agree we should have LNT and LNT+LTO and possibly other configurations in the future. Regarding your buildbots, gcc12 is easy to replace by LNT, because the default, AFAICT, is to run only clang tests (check-all I presume), but gc...

...ead at http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115971.html> I don't know about the submission problems, could they just an occasional network problem or are they a common phenomenon? Chris did some improvements to LNT to report back problems from the server side rather than a generic "500 internal server error" in case of errors. This should become active the next time lnt.llvm.org <http://lnt.llvm.org/> is updated. - Matthias > On Jul 31, 2017, at 12:10 AM, Cohen, Elad2 via llvm-dev <llv...

Hi David, That's weird, I have setup LNT in multiple different distros and have never seen this. Looks like no one ever tested on the system you're running. Can you share a bit more of your environment? Also, you can check the setup.py to see if it does any stripping of package names, which could go wrong in the wrong environment. c...

Hi Matthias, Thank you for your answer. But can you answer for some more questions? First of all, now LNT uses make-style of running tests and parse results from result csv file. Are there any plans to go to cmake? As I understood lit will run and collect all metrics, but there is no opportunity to make any settings for choosing what metrics I would like to collect. Test reports files allow to choose w...

...imizers could have performed better. I believe the mainstream targets can also benefits from my tweaks. But before upstreaming my changes, I would like to quantify their merits on other applications --- not just my domain specific codes. In a word, it seemed the right time for me to start using LNT :) I followed the LNT quickstart guide, and somehow got some results, but have trouble using them. How are the other developers using lnt ? What is the workflow for comparing a patched lllvm to the baseline version ? I am mainly interested in the tests' execution time. 1. I am bit confuse...