On Sep 22, 2010, at 8:49 AMPDT, Bruno Cardoso Lopes wrote:
> Assign the bug to me and I'll fix it in TOT next week! Thanks for
> narrowing it down!
Thanks Bruno, it's PR 8200.
> On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, Nicolas Capens
> <nicolas.capens at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think I figured it out:
>> 112804 causes 64-bit UNPCKLBW to no longer be selected for certain
cases.
>> 112805 is benign.
>> 112806 causes 64-bit UNPCKHBW to no longer be selected for certain
cases.
>>
>> I've attached a potential fix for the 2.8 branch.
>>
>> The real problem is that the code above it which checks for
>> isUNPCK[L|H]_v_undef_Mask cases is only for when OptForSize is true. It
>> assumes that otherwise things can get lowered to PSHUFD (which is true
for
>> v4i32 and v4f32 but nothing else - in particular MMX operations).
>>
>> I'll file a bug now...
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:37
>> To: Bill Wendling
>> Cc: Dale Johannesen; Reid Kleckner; Nicolas Capens; LLVM Developers
Mailing
>> List
>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX
>>
>>
>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 5:30 PMPDT, Bill Wendling wrote:
>>
>>> LLVM isn't going to stop generating MMX instructions all
together. We
>> can't do that. :-) If the user specifically wants MMX (by, say,
using the
>> builtins), we have to support that still. The plan to cease generating
MMX
>> for generic vectors is a work-in-progress right now. It's not in
2.8.
>>>
>>> -bw
>>
>> Right, early on there was speculation that the early phases of this
work
>> were causing the problem Nicolas is seeing, but it now appears that
that
>> problem is unrelated.
>>
>>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Reid Kleckner wrote:
>>>
>>>> This thread confuses me. I thought Chris said that LLVM 2.8
will not
>>>> lower generic vectors to MMX because it breaks x87 code, and I
didn't
>>>> see an answer to your question about a switch to tell the code
>>>> generator otherwise. However, you're complaining that MMX
performance
>>>> is subpar, even though LLVM 2.8 isn't supposed to generate
MMX
>>>> instructions.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone clarify the situation for me?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Reid
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Nicolas Capens
>>>> <nicolas.capens at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Dale,
>>>>>
>>>>> I suspect that these patches were intended to improve
128-bit vector
>>>>> performance but caused certain 64-bit vector operations to
no longer
>> lower
>>>>> to MMX instructions. Anyway, now that I've narrowed it
down to these
>> patches
>>>>> I think I can narrow it down further to a specific case so
I can file a
>>>>> bug...
>>>>>
>>>>> Will Bruno be back soon or is he no longer working on the
project for
>> good?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com]
>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 20:12
>>>>> To: Nicolas Capens
>>>>> Cc: Dale Johannesen; 'Chris Lattner'; 'Eli
Friedman';
>> llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 21, 2010, at 10:23 AMPDT, Nicolas Capens wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry for the late reply. I got sidetracked by other
fun projects. ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I found that the performance regression is caused by
revisions 112804,
>>>>>> 112805 and 112806. Those changes were made 2 days prior
to the 2.8
>>>>>> branching, so it may have not been the intention to
include them there?
>>>>>> Either way they make my vector-intensive code two times
slower so it
>> would
>>>>>> be much appreciated to revert these changes for the 2.8
release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nicolas
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting. These are all Bruno's patches, and
I'm pretty sure they
>>>>> weren't intended to affect MMX. I doubt reverting
them is right since
>> the
>>>>> effect on SSE is presumably positive. Unfortunately Bruno
is not here
>> any
>>>>> more.
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Chris Lattner [mailto:clattner at apple.com]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think some changes related to MMX landed before
2.8 branched which
>>>>>>> shouldn't have... please file a bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> So please file a bug, with example.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>>>>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>>>>> http://lists.c
<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>
> --
> Bruno Cardoso Lopes
> http://www.brunocardoso.cc