search for: johannesen

...4.2 at this time. I did try: llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s And this produced a ppc binary that worked (at least in this case). Do you know if this approach is worthwhile? Thx, Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:50 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi, > &...

On Mar 24, 2008, at 3:18 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > [...] >> I don't see a good way to do >> full-line comments that works both if you run the preprocessor and if >> you don't. > > > Could you use "##" instead of "#"? Pragmatically, that works (as I'm sure you know). Digging...

Thanks again, Dale. Hopefully, someone has the answer. Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work together? I am >...

...worthwhile? That won't work in the general case, because there are things about the ABI, such as calling convention, that are embedded in the .bc file. The front end needs to know you're targeting ppc. > Thx, > > Jose > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:50 PM > To: Jose Rangel > Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question > > llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST...

...ason llvm- gcc-4.2 using the 10.4 sdk wouldn't work, once you get it to build. Don't bother with llvm-gcc-4.0; for one thing, it had some PPC ABI bugs that are fixed in llvm-gcc-4.2. Has anybody built for the environment Jose is targeting? -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work together? I am >...

On Jan 25, 2008, at 9:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Jan 25, 2008, at 9:35 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> Sorry, I forgot to mention. It's a PPC PowerBook G4 running Mac OS X >> 10.4.11. >> >> -bw > > OK, ppc32 EH used to work better than this (although I haven't tried > it on 10.4)....

...nly for when OptForSize is true. It > assumes that otherwise things can get lowered to PSHUFD (which is true for > v4i32 and v4f32 but nothing else - in particular MMX operations). > > I'll file a bug now... > > Nicolas > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] > Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 2:37 > To: Bill Wendling > Cc: Dale Johannesen; Reid Kleckner; Nicolas Capens; LLVM Developers Mailing > List > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX > > > On Sep 21, 2010, at 5:30 PMPDT, Bill Wendling wrote...

On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > >> In many places there is code that looks like: >> >> MBBI = next(MBBI); >> >> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these >> calls are made. And due t...

Sorry, I forgot to mention. It's a PPC PowerBook G4 running Mac OS X 10.4.11. -bw On Jan 25, 2008, at 6:14 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > What target? > > On Jan 25, 2008, at 6:06 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> Here are my test results for the 2.2 prerelease. >> >> Built objDir == srcDir, release, and with the pre-built LLVM-GCC >> binary. >> >> "make test" results:...

Thanks. One thing though, who's Chris? Cheers, Gary Dale Johannesen wrote: > OK, I've checked it in for you, thanks. Please do contact Chris > about write access. > > On Aug 22, 2008, at 12:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > > No, I don't. > > > > Cheers, > > Gary > > > > Dale Johannesen wrote: > > >...

I'm sorry; I should have been more clear. I mean, for instance, run a test but only with, say, llc, not with lli or cbackend. Thanks, --Patrick Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Jul 25, 2010, at 2:37 AMPDT, Patrick Simmons wrote: > >> Thanks, Dale, that really helps. >> >> What about disabling only one backend of a specific test? >> >> Thanks, >> --Patrick > > Not sure I understand, the test for Sparc in the...

On Mar 25, 2008, at 1:08 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Mar 24, 2008, at 3:18 PM, David Vandevoorde wrote: > >> >> On Mar 24, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> [...] >>> I don't see a good way to do >>> full-line comments that works both if you run the preprocessor and >>&g...

Thanks, Dale, that really helps. What about disabling only one backend of a specific test? Thanks, --Patrick On 07/22/10 16:04, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Jul 22, 2010, at 2:44 PMPDT, Patrick Alexander Simmons wrote: > >> From http://llvm.org/docs/TestingGuide.html >> >> Some tests are known to fail. Some are bugs that we have not fixed yet; >> others are features that we haven't added yet (or may ne...

You may have noticed I added an "inlinehint" attribute to the IR yesterday, to represent user declarations that hint inlining would be a good idea ("inline" keyword). Chris and I have been discussing how to hook it up to the C++ FE. Consider: class X { int A(int x) {....} inline int B(int x); }; inline int X::B(int x) {...} Per the language standard, A and B

No, I don't. Cheers, Gary Dale Johannesen wrote: > This looks OK to check in, do you have write access? > > On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > > >Dale Johannesen wrote: > >>On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:18 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > >>>I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on Po...

On Nov 6, 2007, at 6:07 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 6, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: >> $ more testcase.c.t03.generic >> Qux () >> { >> static char C.0[11] = {0}; >> char Bar[11]; >> >> Bar = C.0; >> } >> >> Anyway, it turns out that the gimplifier wa...

I'm working on changing the MMX implementation to use intrinsics in all cases, which should stop various optimization passes from creating MMX instructions that screw up the x87 stack. Right now the MMX instructions are split between X86InstrMMX.td and X86InstrSSE.td, presumably on the historical grounds that some of them weren't introduced until SSE or SSSE3, and require

...o I can file a >>> bug... >>> >>> Will Bruno be back soon or is he no longer working on the project for good? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Nicolas >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 20:12 >>> To: Nicolas Capens >>> Cc: Dale Johannesen; 'Chris Lattner'; 'Eli Friedman'; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu >>> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX >>> >>>...

Hi Dale, Thanks for replying. Concerning Darwin, I compiled this test on snow leopard and ran it using rosetta (that is, using -arch ppc -m32). I will try this later on leopard. Thanks, Jose ________________________________ From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:10 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: 2) The following test is commented out on purpo...

...cc/libgcc2.c -o libgcc/x86_64/_fixxfdi.o Formal argument #0 has unhandled type f80 ../../llvm-gcc-4.0/gcc/libgcc2.c:1235: internal compiler error: Abort trap will disable multilib (./configure --disable-multilib ...) and try again and post the results regards On 19 Sep 2007, at 20:01, Dale Johannesen wrote: > I think the build should work now, could you try? You need both > llvm and llvm-gcc. > There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect > code that > doesn't use long double. > > On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote: &g...