I'm attempting to use the above as described here http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1816469/llvm-mingw-installation-on-vista ...and getting the following error when attempting "llvm-gcc -o hello.exe hello.c" llvm-gcc: CreateProcess: No such file or directory I've heard it may be due to the way GCC is passing args to CreateProcess as in this thread http://readlist.com/lists/lists.sourceforge.net/mingw-users/1/7113.html http://readlist.com/lists/lists.sourceforge.net/mingw-users/1/7180.html Is this the cause or is there something else I need to due with the LLVM binaries? Jon
> I'm attempting to use the above as described here > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1816469/llvm-mingw-installation-on-vista > > ...and getting the following error when attempting "llvm-gcc -o hello.exe hello.c" > > llvm-gcc: CreateProcess: No such file or directory > > > I've heard it may be due to the way GCC is passing args to CreateProcess as in this thread > > http://readlist.com/lists/lists.sourceforge.net/mingw-users/1/7113.html > http://readlist.com/lists/lists.sourceforge.net/mingw-users/1/7180.html > > Is this the cause or is there something else I need to due with the LLVM binaries? >Is there a more appropriate forum for getting this type of question answered? Jon
Hello> Is this the cause or is there something else I need to due with the LLVM binaries?Yes, this might be a possible issue. I'm not sure whether apple's gcc 4.2 (which llvm-gcc 4.2 is based originally on) has that vista workaround patches. Unfortunately, I don't have vista box around to check / debug this issue. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University
> > Is this the cause or is there something else I need to due with the LLVM binaries? > > Yes, this might be a possible issue. I'm not sure whether apple's gcc > 4.2 (which llvm-gcc 4.2 is based originally on) has that vista > workaround patches. > > Unfortunately, I don't have vista box around to check / debug this issue.What's the next step given that, as much as I'd like to, I can't send you a vista box? I'm feeling the patch-the-sources-and-try-compiling-it-yourself answer (which I had hoped to avoid) coming on ;) Any way to get this added to the 2.7 mingw binary release TODO list for proper confirmation/fixing by the LLVM experts? Thanks, Jon
> I'm attempting to use the above as described here > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1816469/llvm-mingw-installation-on-vista > > ...and getting the following error when attempting "llvm-gcc -o hello.exe hello.c" > > llvm-gcc: CreateProcess: No such file or directoryI also get the same issue when trying to run the LLVM MinGW binaries on an XP box, which indicates I'm doing something fundamentally wrong as binaries have been offered all the way back to LLVM 1.8. Is anyone successfully running the 2.6 binaries as-is on any windows box? Is the expectation that the install dance for windows should be similar to installing the binaries from http://mingw.org/ or http://www.tdragon.net/recentgcc/ If someone is successfully running these binaries, I'd appreciate a link or quick summary, and I'll volunteer to submit a doco patch for the Getting Started Guide for this issue. Jon
Hello> Is anyone successfully running the 2.6 binaries as-is on any windows box?Yes. They are running successfully since LLVM 1.8 as-is. The usual test for mingw binaries includes e.g. Qt compilation via llvm-gcc. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov. Faculty of Mathematics & Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University.