Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "recentgcc".
2009 Dec 16
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
Hello, Jon
> What threw me was the projects inclusion of 2 of the 3 other pieces that make up a typical manual install of mingw or http://www.tdragon.net/recentgcc/ I saw the runtime and w32api stuff in my very quick scan of the llvm-gcc dir and didn't bother to confirm binutils :(
Well, binutils are quite different:
1. It's GPL-licensed, thus we need to provide sources as well, which
is bit inconvenient
2. You need to have headers & libs in pred...
2009 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
...installed (to get linker + assembler).
Ahh. After extracting "binutils-2.20-1-mingw32-bin.tar.gz" into the llvm-gcc dir, I'm up and running.
What threw me was the projects inclusion of 2 of the 3 other pieces that make up a typical manual install of mingw or http://www.tdragon.net/recentgcc/ I saw the runtime and w32api stuff in my very quick scan of the llvm-gcc dir and didn't bother to confirm binutils :(
I still would like to see this packaging info made a bit more visible outside the ML, as well as a note clarifying whether the binary setup is still valid when the w32api, mi...
2009 Dec 16
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
Hello, Jon
The main idea of llvm-gcc is to be a drop-in replacement of gcc. So,
if you know how to install & run gcc on your system, you should be
able to do the same with llvm-gcc (thus no "Getting Started" entry).
Basically the only "packaging differences" wrt normal gcc is that
we're shipping w32api & mingw-runtime packages with llvm-gcc. Surely,
you still need
2009 Dec 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
...amentally wrong as binaries have been offered all the way back to LLVM 1.8.
Is anyone successfully running the 2.6 binaries as-is on any windows box?
Is the expectation that the install dance for windows should be similar to installing the binaries from http://mingw.org/ or http://www.tdragon.net/recentgcc/
If someone is successfully running these binaries, I'd appreciate a link or quick summary, and I'll volunteer to submit a doco patch for the Getting Started Guide for this issue.
Jon
2009 Dec 16
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
On Dec 16, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:
> Hello, Jon
>
>> What threw me was the projects inclusion of 2 of the 3 other pieces
>> that make up a typical manual install of mingw or http://www.tdragon.net/recentgcc/
>> I saw the runtime and w32api stuff in my very quick scan of the
>> llvm-gcc dir and didn't bother to confirm binutils :(
> Well, binutils are quite different:
> 1. It's GPL-licensed, thus we need to provide sources as well, which
> is bit inconvenient
> 2. Y...
2009 Dec 17
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
> > What threw me was the projects inclusion of 2 of the 3 other pieces that make up a typical manual install of mingw or http://www.tdragon.net/recentgcc/ I saw the runtime and w32api stuff in my very quick scan of the llvm-gcc dir and didn't bother to confirm binutils :(
> Well, binutils are quite different:
> 1. It's GPL-licensed, thus we need to provide sources as well, which
> is bit inconvenient
To make it easier to use the L...
2009 Dec 02
5
[LLVMdev] LLVM MinGW binaries on Vista issue
I'm attempting to use the above as described here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1816469/llvm-mingw-installation-on-vista
...and getting the following error when attempting "llvm-gcc -o hello.exe hello.c"
llvm-gcc: CreateProcess: No such file or directory
I've heard it may be due to the way GCC is passing args to CreateProcess as in this thread