On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, David Greene<dag at cray.com> wrote:> On Wednesday 15 July 2009 15:43, Török Edwin wrote: > >> How about starting simple, and just auto-tagging builds that work? >> Could be done per OS/arch, and one global tag when all buildbots pass. > > We've talked about this before and I've been working on setting up > such a system. Unfortunately, I can't figure out why my buildbots > fail to configure llvm-gcc.I plan to check my buildbot configuration "stuff" into the llvm-project repository soon. I have to refactor things a bit to support use by other people, but currently I have configurations for llvm, clang, and llvm-gcc in various target / self-hosting permutations. I also have a regular buildbot driver nightlytest (the smoosh-01 results on llvm-testresults). My hope is that once checked in Danny and I can merged the current public buildbot configuration and my configuration so that all buildbots are driven from the same master configuration (with additional local configuration magic). This should make it easier for other organizations to set up their own buildbots, and to add new buildbot configurations (like MSVC/cmake).> Is there a link to the buildbots on the website? I can't find it.Chris updated the website, its now listed under "Dev. Resources". Please consider contributing a buildslave for the platform you care about. - Daniel> > -Dave > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >
2009/7/16 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>> I plan to check my buildbot configuration "stuff" into the > llvm-project repository soon. I have to refactor things a bit to > support use by other people, but currently I have configurations for > llvm, clang, and llvm-gcc in various target / self-hosting > permutations. I also have a regular buildbot driver nightlytest (the > smoosh-01 results on llvm-testresults).Excellent! Could you please check this into, e.g. llvm/utils/testing/buildbot ? I'm hoping to have llvm/utils/ become cleaner and more organized rather than a mish-mash of useful scripts that get lost in the flat structure.> My hope is that once checked in Danny and I can merged the current > public buildbot configuration and my configuration so that all > buildbots are driven from the same master configuration (with > additional local configuration magic). This should make it easier for > other organizations to set up their own buildbots, and to add new > buildbot configurations (like MSVC/cmake).This would definitely be welcome. Misha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090717/f9a0fe76/attachment.html>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Misha Brukman<brukman at gmail.com> wrote:> 2009/7/16 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> >> >> I plan to check my buildbot configuration "stuff" into the >> llvm-project repository soon. I have to refactor things a bit to >> support use by other people, but currently I have configurations for >> llvm, clang, and llvm-gcc in various target / self-hosting >> permutations. I also have a regular buildbot driver nightlytest (the >> smoosh-01 results on llvm-testresults). > > Excellent! > Could you please check this into, e.g. llvm/utils/testing/buildbot ? > I'm hoping to have llvm/utils/ become cleaner and more organized rather than > a mish-mash of useful scripts that get lost in the flat structure.Actually it will end up going here: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/zorg/trunk/ which will eventually have my new nightly testing infrastructure and other testing "stuff", like the buildbot configurations. I need to do some refactoring on my current stuff to make it more useful to other people, but it should be in within a week. - Daniel>> My hope is that once checked in Danny and I can merged the current >> public buildbot configuration and my configuration so that all >> buildbots are driven from the same master configuration (with >> additional local configuration magic). This should make it easier for >> other organizations to set up their own buildbots, and to add new >> buildbot configurations (like MSVC/cmake). > > This would definitely be welcome. > Misha > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >