search for: zuster

On 2 April 2013 19:20, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > What is it that makes the output of the program asynchronous? The output > is deterministic on Darwin, so it seems like it should be possible to make > it more stable. > This is a virus scan and, AFAICS, depends on the order in which the INODEs are laid out in the dir...

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >> I tried setting these to false, but the resulting executable (made >> with link.exe) crashed. I looked at the differences in the object >> file, but couldn't figure...

I was delayed creating the smaller patches, but finally I had some time to put the first set together. There are three small patches, the first two are classes the MCJITStreamer uses, and the last patch is the MCJITStreamer class itself. - Jan --- On Sun, 8/1/10, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > From: Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MC-JIT Patches 2/3 > To: "Jan Sjodin" <jan_sjodin at yahoo.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Date: Sunday, August 1, 2010, 6:...

...install like this: pip install svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk <svn+http://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/lnt/trunk> > On Jul 18, 2017, at 11:24 AM, Kristof Beyls <kristof.beyls at arm.com> wrote: > > >> On 18 Jul 2017, at 20:21, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org <mailto:daniel at zuster.org>> wrote: >> >> I'd be fine pulling the pypi (sic) entry, shall I make it so? > > I also think it's best to remove it from pypi, since we're not keeping it up-to-date. > >> >> - Daniel >> >> On T...

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >>> I tried setting these to false, but the resulting executable (made >>> with link.exe) crashed. I looked at the differences in the object >>> file, but cou...

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Kenneth Uildriks<kennethuil at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Daniel Dunbar<daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >> We would like to have access to some kind of regular expression >> library inside LLVM. For example, we need this to extend the FileCheck >> test case checking tool to support regular expressions. >> >> There are three obvious options: >>  1. Ro...

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >  * I don't think CMake is good enough. I agree it solves problems, but > I want to use great tools, not ones that work. In particular: >    (c) This doesn't solve any other nice problems: >          (i) It doesn't make it easier to play with other build >...

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: >> Daniel somehow replied to one of my previous commits on llvm-commits >> instead of this thread. >> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at...

...stdc++-v3] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ang/build/llvm-gcc' make: *** [all] Error 2 real 202m0.538s user 23m45.661s sys 24m39.707s Any one got any clues, Aaron 2009/7/26 Aaron Gray <aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> > 2009/7/26 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Aaron >> Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: >> > 2009/7/26 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> >> > lvm-backend.o >> > /home/ang/svn/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp: In function 'voi...

Hi Daniel, Daniel Dunbar <daniel <at> zuster.org> writes: > > Ultimately I think a better API would be to provide a generic class > which represents an executed operating system process, and includes > operations to wait for its completion, redirect its IO, communicate > with it, etc. This would be a big improvement over t...

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:41 AM, Aaron Gray<aaronngray.lists at googlemail.com> wrote: > 2009/7/26 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> > lvm-backend.o > /home/ang/svn/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp: In function 'void > llvm_initialize_b > ackend()': > /home/ang/svn/llvm-gcc/gcc/llvm-backend.cpp:455: error: > 'getClosestStaticTargetF > orModule' is not a member of 'llvm::TargetRegistr...

On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:11:14 -0700, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > After looking at this again I don't think this approach is really > tenable. I'm going to start hacking on an alternate approach, which > should end up with the same result. Please ping me again if you don't > hear anything in a day or tw...

On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > - Please split the patch into at least four parts: > (1) Add WinCOFFStreamer, with a stub implementation. > (2) Add WinCOFFObjectWriter, with a stub implementation. > (3) Fill in WinCOFFStreamer. > (4) Fill in WinCOFFObjectWriter. Attached is patch numb...

On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 2 April 2013 19:20, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > >> What is it that makes the output of the program asynchronous? The output >> is deterministic on Darwin, so it seems like it should be possible to make >> it more stable. >> > > This is a virus scan and, AFAICS, depends on the order in which the I...

On 17 June 2013 19:01, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > There are several individual users who still use the full Makefile > infrastructure. I think we pretty much use LNT exclusively for automated > runs now, but for development purposes the Makefile setup still has various > features that make it more amenable to incremen...

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org>wrote: > On 12 March 2013 16:48, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > >> The former mode is historically what the test suite did, the latter mode >> is substantially faster (and independent of bugs in the native CC). >> > > Yes, I agree this is better for many cases, but not for all. Implementing > RNG that is good enoug...

Daniel somehow replied to one of my previous commits on llvm-commits instead of this thread. On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Two minor notes: > -- >> diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmBackend.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmBackend.cpp >> index 2cf65c1..02ac2be 100644 >> --- a/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmBackend.cpp >> +++ b/lib/Target/X86/X86AsmBackend.cpp >&gt...

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > I don't know the answer to this question, but I've attached an (old) > version of pybugz that I tweaked a little to work with LLVM bugzilla. You > can probably write such queries on top of this if you feel like figuring > out its API: > Thanks. Looks like...

2009/7/12 Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org>: > That's pretty awesome! Thanks! > Will ar, etc. eventually get some autodiscovery of plugins so that > things work OOTB after a make install of llvm/llvm-gcc? The bfd library (used by ar and nm) already searches for plugins in $install_dir/lib/bfd-plugins/. Maybe we could...

On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Daniel Dunbar<daniel at zuster.org> wrote: > Since it came up, what is blocking us from putting these tests in the > llvm-gcc test suite instead of in the LLVM test suite? Usually we want to check these tests regularly against llvm backend changes. The nightly tester does not svn update and rebuild llvm-gcc hence these...