I have just noticed that -g doesn't emit debug info for data-only files. Before I get deep into fixing this, let me make sure it isn't intentional?
Not even for externally visible symbols? That sounds like a bug. Evan On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:> I have just noticed that -g doesn't emit debug info for data-only > files. > Before I get deep into fixing this, let me make sure it isn't > intentional? > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:08 PMPDT, Evan Cheng wrote:> Not even for externally visible symbols? That sounds like a bug. > > EvanI thought so, just checking.> On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:01 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> I have just noticed that -g doesn't emit debug info for data-only >> files. >> Before I get deep into fixing this, let me make sure it isn't >> intentional? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] -g in data-only files
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r104737 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r104737 - /llvm/trunk/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGISel.cpp
- [LLVMdev] LLVM 2.8 and MMX
- [LLVMdev] What does this error mean: psuedo instructions should be removed before code emission?